Dale A. Drozd

How Judge Drozd rules, drawn from 15 signed orders. Every observation links to the order it came from.

Court
United States District Court for the Eastern District of California
Position
district
Appointed by
Barack Obama (Democratic)
Commissioned
2015-11-02
ABA rating
Unanimously Well Qualified
Education
San Diego State University (B.A., 1977); University of California, Los Angeles, School of Law (J.D., 1980)
Signed orders read
15

How Judge Drozd decides

Patterns drawn from this judge's own signed orders. Every observation links to the order it came from.

What persuades

He denies a defendant's motion to dismiss where the plaintiff has adequately pleaded the claim, including an employment retaliation claim.

“For the reasons stated above, defendants' motion to dismiss (Doc. No. 11) is denied in its entirety.”

In immigration habeas, requires the government to identify a valid statutory basis for detention; where Section 1226(a) required a warrant and the record showed none, ordered immediate release rather than only a bond hearing.

“Therefore, the court finds that petitioner’s detention is not authorized by statute and the appropriate remedy is petitioner’s immediate release.”

Procedural preferences

He refers prisoner and civil-rights matters to a magistrate judge and, after de novo review even over a pro se litigant's objections, adopts the findings and recommendations in full.

“Defendants' motion to dismiss this action (Doc. No. 43) is granted and this action is dismissed with prejudice”

In ADA access cases he grants default judgment against a non-appearing defendant by adopting the magistrate judge's unopposed recommendation.

“Plaintiff's motion for default judgment against defendants (Doc. No. 19) is granted”

When an immigration detainee has already received the statutory bond hearing, Judge Drozd treats further custody review as unavailable in habeas where binding precedent forecloses the prolonged-detention theory.

“Petitioner’s petition for writ of habeas corpus (Doc. No. 1) is DENIED;”

Signed rulings

A grounded sample of orders signed by this judge, with the verbatim dispositive language.

Kryzhanovskiy v. Amazon.com Services, Inc.
2:21-cv-01292-DAD-BAM · 2022-06-28
Motions to dismiss (defendant) Denied

“For the reasons stated above, defendants' motion to dismiss (Doc. No. 11) is denied in its entirety.”

Dohermann v. Department of State Hospitals
2:24-cv-01862-DAD-AC · 2025-04-30
Motions to dismiss (defendant) Granted

“Defendants' motion to dismiss plaintiff's first amended complaint (Doc. No. 16) is GRANTED, without leave to amend; 2. This action is dismissed; and 3. The Clerk of the Court is directed to close this case.”

Alston v. City of Sacramento
2:21-cv-02049-DAD-AC · 2023-02-12
Summary judgment (plaintiff) Denied

“Plaintiff's motion for summary judgment (Doc. No. 18) is denied”

Fuentes v. Mule Creek State Prison
2:23-cv-00386-DAD-CSK · 2026-02-14
Motions to dismiss (defendant) Granted

“Defendants' motion to dismiss this action (Doc. No. 43) is granted and this action is dismissed with prejudice”

Tufono v. Dhillion
2:23-cv-02691-DAD-SCR · 2025-03-24
Summary judgment (defendant) Moot / procedural

“Defendants' motion for summary judgment (Doc. No. 26) is denied as having been rendered moot by this order”

Gallegos v. California Department of Corrections & Rehabilitation
2:22-cv-01790-DAD-EFB · 2024-09-16
Motions to dismiss (defendant) Granted

“Defendant's motion to dismiss (Doc. No. 32) is granted; ... This action is dismissed, without leave to amend”

Motion for leave to amend (plaintiff) Denied

“Plaintiff's motion for leave to amend his operative complaint to add defendants and bring claims against those defendants (Doc. No. 36) is denied”

Preliminary injunction (plaintiff) Denied

“Plaintiff's motion for preliminary injunctive relief (Doc. No. 38) is denied”

Motion to consolidate (plaintiff) Denied

“Plaintiff's motion to consolidate cases (Doc. No. 53) is denied”

Dozier v. Singh
1:23-cv-00736-DAD-AC · 2024-07-24
Default judgment (plaintiff) Granted

“Plaintiff's motion for default judgment against defendants (Doc. No. 19) is granted”

United States v. Huckaby
2:23-cv-00587-DAD-JDP · 2026-03-02
Summary judgment (plaintiff) Granted in part

“Plaintiff's motion for summary judgment (Doc. No. 43) is GRANTED IN PART ... The United States' judgment lien encumbers defendant Huckaby's one-half ownership interest in the Property; ... Plaintiff's motion is otherwise DENIED.”

Nevada Fleet LLC v. FedEx Corp.
2:17-cv-01732-DAD-CSK · 2026-03-12
Summary judgment (defendant) Granted

“Defendants' motion for summary judgment (Doc. No. 218) is GRANTED in its entirety”

Summary judgment (plaintiff) Denied

“Plaintiff's motion for partial summary judgment (Doc. No. 219) is DENIED”

Daubert motion (defendant) Moot / procedural

“Defendants' motion to exclude expert opinions and testimony pursuant to Daubert (Doc. No. 217) is DENIED as having been rendered moot by this order”

Motion for sanctions (defendant) Moot / procedural

“Defendants' motion for terminating sanctions (Doc. No. 253) is denied as having been rendered moot by this order”

Stokes v. Costello
2:24-cv-02413-DAD-CSK · 2026-03-17
Summary judgment (defendant) Granted

“Defendant’s motion for summary judgment (Doc. No. 25) is granted;”

Martinez-Fernandez v. Warden
1:26-cv-01660-DAD-SCR · 2026-04-07
Habeas petition (petitioner) Granted

“Petitioner’s first amended petition for writ of habeas corpus (Doc. No. 6) is GRANTED as follows:”

Mayen v. Warden, California City Detention Center
1:26-cv-02354-DAD-AC · 2026-04-28
Habeas petition (petitioner) Granted

“Petitioner’s petition for writ of habeas corpus (Doc. No. 1) is GRANTED as follows:”

Motions to dismiss (respondent) Denied

“Respondents’ motion to dismiss the petition (Doc. No. 9) is DENIED;”

Caseload & timing

From public federal docket records for this judge.

The June 2026 sample is dominated by newly filed consumer warranty cases and immigration-detention habeas petitions, along with general civil matters. Drozd's merits caseload also includes employment, prisoner and pro se civil-rights, and government-defendant civil-rights actions across the Sacramento and Fresno divisions.

Draft for Judge Drozd with the record in hand

Ezel grounds your drafting and research in this profile: what has persuaded Judge Drozd, and what has not, cited to the signed orders.

Opens in Ezel Pro.

  • Grounded in Judge Drozd's own signed orders
  • Cites every source it relies on, so you can verify it
  • Chat, drafting and research in one workspace