Christopher D. Baker

How Judge Baker rules, drawn from 9 signed orders. Every observation links to the order it came from.

Court
United States District Court for the Eastern District of California
Position
magistrate
Commissioned
2022-10-03
Education
United States Naval Academy (B.S., Political Science, 1994); National Intelligence University (M.S., Strategic Intelligence, 2013); University of California, Los Angeles, School of Law (J.D., 2004)
Signed orders read
9

How Judge Baker decides

Patterns drawn from this judge's own signed orders. Every observation links to the order it came from.

What persuades

On summary judgment, issues a split recommendation: granting exhaustion-based summary judgment for some defendants (dismissing without prejudice) while denying it for others.

“Defendants Brainard and Stohl's motion for summary judgment based on failure to exhaust administrative remedies (Doc. 63) be GRANTED and claims against these defendants be dismissed without prejudice”

Applies Social Security step two as a de minimis screening threshold and remands when the ALJ treats documented mental and physical impairments as non-severe without considering their combined workplace effects at later steps.

“Because Plaintiff’s evidence establishes her mental impairments have more than a minimal effect on her ability to work, the Court cannot find that it is clearly established by the medical evidence that Plaintiff’s mental impairments are non-severe.”

Procedural preferences

Grants partial summary judgment, dismissing specific counts with prejudice while letting others proceed.

“City Defendants' motion for partial summary judgment (Doc. 53) is GRANTED IN PART to the following extent: i. The motion is GRANTED to the extent of dismissing counts two, seven, eight, and ten with prejudice, and count six with prejudice as to Defendants Anderberg and the City of Bakersfield; ii. The motion is DENIED as to count nine (Fourth Amendment - search and seizure of vehicle).”

Cautions

In Social Security appeals, denies the claimant's motion for summary judgment and affirms the Commissioner's decision.

“Plaintiff's motion for summary judgment (Doc. 20) is DENIED; 2. The decision of the Commissioner of Social Security is AFFIRMED.”

Will treat an ALJ's factual mistake as harmless when other clear and convincing reasons independently support the symptom-testimony analysis.

“The ALJ erred in finding that Plaintiff had failed to mention her need to lie down to her medical providers in the period under review. However, the error is harmless as the ALJ provided valid reasons to discount Plaintiff’s credibility as to her symptom testimony”

Signed rulings

A grounded sample of orders signed by this judge, with the verbatim dispositive language.

Hackworth v. Arevalos
1:19-cv-01362-ADA-CDB · 2022-12-30
Summary judgment (defendant) Granted

“Defendants Brainard and Stohl's motion for summary judgment based on failure to exhaust administrative remedies (Doc. 63) be GRANTED and claims against these defendants be dismissed without prejudice”

Summary judgment (defendant) Denied

“Defendant Arevalos's motion for summary judgment (Doc. 77) be DENIED”

Default judgment (plaintiff) Denied

“Plaintiff's motion for default judgment (Doc. 79) be DENIED”

Wilson v. Delano State Prison
1:21-cv-01651-KES-CDB · 2024-03-27
Summary judgment (defendant) Denied

“Defendants' motion for summary judgment for a failure to exhaust administrative remedies (Doc. 37) be DENIED, subject to an evidentiary hearing.”

Potts v. Commissioner of Social Security
1:21-cv-00625-CDB · 2024-05-14
Summary judgment (claimant) Denied

“Plaintiff's motion for summary judgment (Doc. 20) is DENIED; 2. The decision of the Commissioner of Social Security is AFFIRMED.”

Hearn v. City of Bakersfield
1:22-cv-00668-CDB · 2024-06-13
Summary judgment (defendant) Granted in part

“City Defendants' motion for partial summary judgment (Doc. 53) is GRANTED IN PART to the following extent: i. The motion is GRANTED to the extent of dismissing counts two, seven, eight, and ten with prejudice, and count six with prejudice as to Defendants Anderberg and the City of Bakersfield; ii. The motion is DENIED as to count nine (Fourth Amendment - search and seizure of vehicle).”

Peter Millar, LLC v. Peter Millar, LP
1:25-cv-00761-KES-CDB · 2026-04-03
Default judgment (plaintiff) Granted

“Plaintiffs' motion for default judgment (Doc. 15) is recommended GRANTED.”

Jackson National Life Insurance Co. v. Lim
1:23-cv-00442-CDB · 2024-03-25
Motion for attorney fees (plaintiff) Granted

“Plaintiff's motion for award of attorney's fees (Doc. 49) is GRANTED.”

Misak v. Commissioner of Social Security
1:22-cv-01348-CDB · 2025-09-16
Social security appeal (claimant) Granted

“Plaintiff’s motion for summary judgment (Doc. 16) is GRANTED; The ALJ’s decision (Doc. 11) is REVERSED; This matter is REMANDED pursuant to sentence four of 42 U.S.C. §405(g) for further proceedings consistent with this decision;”

Blose v. Commissioner of Social Security
1:22-cv-01651-CDB · 2026-01-13
Social security appeal (claimant) Denied

“Plaintiff’s motion for summary judgment (Doc. 18) is DENIED; The ALJ’s decision is affirmed;”

Villasenor v. Centene Corporation
1:25-cv-00190 · 2026-04-13
Motions to dismiss (defendants) Granted

“Defendants’ motion to dismiss (Doc. 30) is GRANTED;”

Motion for leave to file supplemental authority (plaintiff) Denied

“Plaintiff’s motion for leave to file supplemental authority (Doc. 35) is DENIED;”

Motion for leave to file amicus brief (non-party proposed amicus) Denied

“Non-party Edward Santillan’s motion for leave to file amicus curiae brief (Doc. 36) is DENIED;”

Caseload & timing

From public federal docket records for this judge.

  • Baker presides over a Bakersfield-division consent Social Security docket in which the parties proceed under 28 U.S.C. 636(c) and he enters the final merits judgment himself.
  • His broader referral docket carries prisoner civil-rights (42 U.S.C. 1983) matters, habeas corpus petitions (28 U.S.C. 2254 and 2241), civil motions in diversity and federal-question cases, and criminal matters arising on federal lands.

Draft for Judge Baker with the record in hand

Ezel grounds your drafting and research in this profile: what has persuaded Judge Baker, and what has not, cited to the signed orders.

Opens in Ezel Pro.

  • Grounded in Judge Baker's own signed orders
  • Cites every source it relies on, so you can verify it
  • Chat, drafting and research in one workspace