Anthony W. Ishii

United States District Court for the Eastern District of California district Senior status Appointed by Bill Clinton (Democratic) 18 signed orders read

Signed rulings

A grounded sample of orders signed by this judge, with the verbatim dispositive language.

Lopez v. Employer (FEHA/employment)
1:08-cv-00719-AWI-SMS · 2009-10-07
Summary judgment (defendant) Granted in part

“Defendant's motion for summary judgment is GRANTED in part and DENIED in part as follows: ... e. Defendant is DENIED summary judgment on Plaintiff's FEHA claim alleging Failure to Accommodate. f. Defendant is DENIED summary adjudication on Plaintiff's Termination in Violation of Public Policy claim to the extent this claim is based on Defendant's Failure to Accommodate.”

Duran v. Defendants
1:07-cv-01209-AWI-SMS · 2007-12-19
Motions to dismiss (defendant) Denied

“Based on the above memorandum opinion, the Court ORDERS that: 1. Defendants' motion to dismiss is DENIED;”

Motion to quash service (defendant) Granted

“2. Defendants' motion to quash service is GRANTED. 3. Plaintiff is directed to complete service on Defendants within thirty days of the date of this order.”

Raul (Petitioner) v. Respondent Warden
1:06-cv-01377-AWI-LJO · 2006-12-13
Motions to dismiss (respondent) Granted

“Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that: 1. Respondent's Motion to Dismiss is GRANTED; 2. The Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus is DISMISSED as moot; and 3. The Clerk of Court is DIRECTED to enter judgment.”

Yu-Santos v. Ford Motor Company
1:06-cv-01773 · 2009-05-13
Daubert motion (defendant) Denied

“Defendants' motions to exclude the testimony of Plaintiff's experts Broadhead and Hayes are DENIED.”

Summary judgment (defendant) Granted in part

“Defendants TRW AH, TRW AU, and TRW AI's motion for summary judgment on Plaintiff's first, second, third, and fourth causes of action is GRANTED and Plaintiff's first, second third, and fourth causes of action against Defendants TRW AH, TRW AU, and TRW AI are dismissed with prejudice.”

DeShazier v. Williams (Hanford Police Officers / City of Hanford)
1:06-cv-00591 · 2008-10-09
Summary judgment (defendant) Granted in part

“Defendant's motion for summary judgment is GRANTED as to defendant City of Hanford only with respect to the claims alleged in Plaintiff's first claim for relief pursuant to 28 U.S.C. section 1983. ... Except as granted in item #1, above, Defendants' motion for summary judgment is DENIED as to all claims against all individual Defendants.”

Williams v. Barteau (Porterville Police Department)
1:08-cv-00546 · 2010-03-18
Summary judgment (defendant) Granted

“Defendants' motion for summary judgment is GRANTED; ... The Clerk shall enter judgment in favor of Defendants and against Plaintiff and CLOSE this case.”

Radillo v. Lunes
1:04-cv-05353 · 2008-09-06
Summary judgment (defendant) Granted in part

“Defendants' motion for summary judgment is GRANTED except as to Defendant Chamalbide on the failure to protect claim;”

Merrill v. County of Madera
1:05-cv-00195 · 2007-03-13
Motion for reconsideration (plaintiff) Denied

“Plaintiffs' motion for reconsideration is DENIED”

Thomas v. Hickman
1:06-cv-00215 · 2006-10-05
Motions to dismiss (defendant) Granted in part

“CDC Defendants' motion to dismiss for failure to state a claim is GRANTED in part and DENIED in part; ... Defendant Ugwu-Oju's motion to dismiss for failure to state a claim is GRANTED in part and DENIED in part; ... Defendant Madera's motion to dismiss for failure to state a claim is GRANTED in part and DENIED in part;”

Parker v. Fidelity Security Life Insurance Co.
1:06-cv-00654 · 2006-07-27
Motions to dismiss (defendant) Granted in part

“Defendant's Rule 12(b)(6) motion to dismiss Plaintiff's second cause of action is GRANTED and that cause of action is DISMISSED with leave to amend; Defendant's Rule 12(b)(6) motion to dismiss Plaintiff's third cause of action is DENIED;”

Countrywide Home Loans, Inc. v. United States
1:02-cv-06405 · 2005-04-29
Motions to dismiss (defendant) Denied

“Countrywide and CTC's motion to dismiss is DENIED;”

Motions to dismiss (defendant) Granted in part

“LaSalle and Nevada Trust's motion to dismiss is DENIED in part and GRANTED in part; LaSalle and Nevada Trust are DISMISSED from all causes of action other than the fourth cause of action for the return of funds;”

Garcia v. Clovis Unified School District
1:08-cv-01924 · 2009-04-15
Motions to dismiss (defendant) Granted in part

“CUSD's motion will be granted in part and denied in part.”

Caseload & timing

From public federal docket records for this judge.

Median motion-to-ruling time: 105 days (N = 1).

As a senior judge, Ishii's recent caseload is light and includes many short-duration civil-rights, disability-access, and prisoner cases that settled, were voluntarily dismissed, or were remanded, along with older criminal matters from his active service. The durations below measure filing to termination within the sample.

Put Judge Ishii's record to work

Ezel drafts and answers grounded in this exact profile: how Judge Ishii actually rules, not a generic AI guess.

Opens in Ezel Pro. Every answer is grounded in Judge Ishii's own signed orders and cites them.