Ronald H. Sargis

How Judge Sargis rules, drawn from 16 signed orders. Every observation links to the order it came from.

Court
U.S. Bankruptcy Court for the Eastern District of California
Position
bankruptcy
Appointed by
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Commissioned
2010-01-14
Education
Stanford University, B.A. in political science, 1979; University of the Pacific, McGeorge School of Law, J.D. with distinction, 1982
Signed orders read
16

How Judge Sargis decides

Patterns drawn from this judge's own signed orders. Every observation links to the order it came from.

What persuades

Remand may be appropriate where bankruptcy administration is nearly complete and returning the dispute to state court is likely to advance adjudication.

“There is little left to do with Bankruptcy Case administration. Such a remand does not create any additional burden or delay for the parties in connection with the Bankruptcy Case, and is likely to advance the actual trial date and entry of a judgment adjudicating the Claims and the Affirmative Defenses asserted in the State Court Action.”

Procedural preferences

Fee requests should include billing records and a task-based analysis sufficient to evaluate the services and charges.

“This court finds helpful, and in most cases essential, for professionals to provide a basic task billing analysis for the services provided and fees charged, in addition to the actual billing records.”

Cautions

A deficient claim may be dismissed without prejudice, but further amendment can require a timely motion for leave supported by the proposed pleading.

“If Plaintiff desires to amend his Complaint to state further claims for relief against Defendant-Bridgette, such may be done only with leave of the court.”

Signed rulings

A grounded sample of orders signed by this judge, with the verbatim dispositive language.

Evans v. Windsor
24-02190 · 2025-02-20
Motions to remand (plaintiff) Granted

“The Motion is granted and State Court Action, Evans vs. Windsor Vallejo Care Center, LLC, et al, Case No. FCS055755, is remanded to the California Superior Court for the County of Solano, effective immediately upon this Court entering its order.”

In re Singh
23-22540 · 2024-01-03
Objection to claimed exemption (creditor) Granted

“The Objection to Claimed Exemption for $9,525.00 in the California liquor license pursuant to California Code of Civil Procedure § 703.140(b)(6) is sustained and the claimed exemption of $9,525.00 is disallowed in its entirety.”

Sobayo v. Bank of New York Mellon
23-02001 · 2023-02-02
Motion for reconsideration (debtor) Denied

“The court shall issue a separate order denying the Ex Parte Motion for Reconsideration and Ex Parte Motion For Continuance of All Related Proceedings.”

Motion to continue related proceedings (debtor) Denied
Black v. Akins
18-02187 · 2022-05-25
Motion for sanctions (defendant) Denied

“Sanctions is denied.”

Black v. Akins
18-02187 · 2022-05-19
Motion for prevailing party attorney fees (defendant) Denied

“The Motion is denied.”

Golden v. Internal Revenue Service
21-02012 · 2022-04-27
Summary judgment (plaintiff-debtor) Granted

“Therefore, Plaintiff-Debtor’s Countermotion for Summary Judgment is granted.”

Summary judgment (Internal Revenue Service) Denied

“Further, Defendant-IRS’s Motion for Summary Judgment is denied.”

In re Trocke
20-21910 · 2021-11-16
Motion for prevailing party attorney fees (debtor) Granted

“The court having determined that Movant is the prevailing party and that California Civil Code § 1717 provides that the prevailing party shall be awarded attorney’s fees, the court determines that the requested $24,185.58 in attorney’s fees is reasonable in this Contested Matter for services provided in litigating the objection proceedings with respect to Debtor’s objection to Creditor’s Proof of Claim 2.”

In re Trocke
20-21910 · 2021-11-16

This companion decision determined that the creditor was not the prevailing party; it is retained for context but excluded from the illustrative counts because the decision does not state the fee-motion disposition in a clean standalone sentence.

In re Trocke
20-21910 · 2021-07-16
Objection to claim (debtor) Granted

“Debtor’s Objection to Creditor’s Original Proof of Claim 2-1 was sustained and the relief sought by Debtor, and opposed by Creditor, was substantially granted.”

In re Myre
20-25072 · 2021-04-15
Objection to claimed exemption (creditor) Granted

“The Creditor’s Objection is sustained, and the claimed exemption in the amount of $100,000.00 is disallowed for all amount in excess of $75,000.00, the homestead exemption amount allowable under former California Code of Civil Procedure § 704.730(a)(1).”

In re Myre
20-25072 · 2021-04-15
Objection to claim (debtor) Granted

“The Objection is sustained and the court determines that a judgment lien for Creditor was not created by the recording of the abstract of judgment form recorded on September 21, 2020, with the Nevada County, California County Recorder, Document No. 20200024316, a copy of which is attached to the Claim, p. 4.”

Reger v. Essex Bank
20-02130 · 2021-04-01
Summary judgment (plaintiff-trustee) Granted in part

“The court shall issue a separate order granting partial summary judgment”

Caseload & timing

From public federal docket records for this judge.

Completed-case duration is reported for 5 terminated matters in the fixed sample.

Draft for Judge Sargis with the record in hand

Ezel grounds your drafting and research in this profile: what has persuaded Judge Sargis, and what has not, cited to the signed orders.

Opens in Ezel Pro.

  • Grounded in Judge Sargis's own signed orders
  • Cites every source it relies on, so you can verify it
  • Chat, drafting and research in one workspace