Wayne E. Johnson

How Judge Johnson rules, drawn from 7 signed orders. Every observation links to the order it came from.

Judge Johnson no longer hears cases. This profile is preserved as a historical record of how they ruled.

Court
U.S. Bankruptcy Court for the Central District of California
Position
bankruptcy
Status
Retired 2025
Served
2011–2025
Appointed by
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Commissioned
2011-02-28
Education
Cornell University (B.A., magna cum laude, 1989); University of Pennsylvania Law School (J.D., 1992)
Signed orders read
7

How Judge Johnson decides

Patterns drawn from this judge's own signed orders. Every observation links to the order it came from.

Procedural preferences

Equitable tolling was left for an actual avoidance action so the affected defendant would receive notice and an opportunity to contest it.

“By denying the motion today, the court merely holds that the trustee cannot win the argument of whether or not equitable tolling applies in advance and without notice and an opportunity for the defendant to resist application of the doctrine.”

Cautions

In overlapping spousal bankruptcy cases, disclosed community property may transfer by operation of law when the first estate closes, changing what a later Chapter 13 plan must address.

“For the following reasons, the Court concludes that the assets do transfer by operation of law from one bankruptcy estate to the other.”

Signed rulings

A grounded sample of orders signed by this judge, with the verbatim dispositive language.

In re Kimberly Hardy
6:22-bk-11277 · 2022-04-21
Motion to impose or continue automatic stay (debtor Kimberly Hardy) Denied

“Accordingly, for the reasons stated, the Motion is hereby denied.”

In re David Allen Cramer
6:20-bk-11457 · 2022-02-08
Motion to extend avoidance action deadlines (Chapter 7 trustee) Denied

“By denying the motion today, the court merely holds that the trustee cannot win the argument of whether or not equitable tolling applies in advance and without notice and an opportunity for the defendant to resist application of the doctrine.”

In re La Granja 240, L.P.
6:21-bk-12906 · 2022-01-10
Request for 180 day refiling bar (primary secured creditor) Granted

“For the reasons stated below, the court concludes that the 180-day bar to re-filing a new case does apply.”

In re Marisa Moreno
6:19-bk-11255 · 2020-07-17
Objection to plan confirmation (Chapter 13 trustee) Granted

“Accordingly, the Court grants the request of the Trustee to deny confirmation of the pending chapter 13 plan.”

Motion to dismiss bankruptcy case (Chapter 13 trustee) Denied

“However, the request of the Trustee to dismiss the case is denied.”

In re Charles E. Cowser
6:19-bk-21008 · 2020-02-28
Objection to plan confirmation (Chapter 13 trustee) Granted

“For these reasons, the Court must grant the motion of the trustee to deny confirmation of the chapter 13 plan and dismiss this case.”

Motion to dismiss bankruptcy case (Chapter 13 trustee) Granted
In re Carlos Alberto Quiroz and Angeles Jacuinde Quiroz
6:17-bk-10255 · 2019-12-12
Supplemental fee application (The Travis Law Firm) Granted in part

“Accordingly, for the reasons set forth above, the Court hereby awards $675, $650 and $1,000 for a total of $2,325 in allowed fees and costs.”

U.S. Bank National Association v. Mustafa (In re Hasan Mustafa)
6:19-ap-01166 · 2019-12-03
Sua sponte remand (court) Granted

“Accordingly, the Court shall enter a separate order remanding this adversary proceeding back to state court.”

A historical record

Judge Johnson no longer hears cases. This profile stays available as a record of how they ruled. If you're preparing for a matter, start from the court's current bench.