Scott C. Clarkson

How Judge Clarkson rules, drawn from 10 signed orders. Every observation links to the order it came from.

Court
U.S. Bankruptcy Court for the Central District of California
Position
bankruptcy
Appointed by
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Commissioned
2011-01-20
Education
Indiana University Bloomington (B.A., 1979); George Mason University School of Law (J.D., 1982; articles editor, Law Review)
Signed orders read
10

How Judge Clarkson decides

Patterns drawn from this judge's own signed orders. Every observation links to the order it came from.

What persuades

Stay relief favored allowing mature, multi-party state litigation to proceed when that forum was ready for trial and best positioned to resolve its own orders.

“the Texas Action involves multiple parties and multiple Texas state law causes of action. It has been pending for over two years in Texas state court, and it is ready for trial.”

Issue preclusion supported nondischargeability where the debtor had actively participated in earlier litigation that established knowing counterfeit sales.

“The Defendant is bound by the findings in the Default Judgment and the Default Judgment Order.”

Procedural preferences

Pleading-stage dismissal may distinguish incurable federal theories from common-law theories that could be repaired by amendment.

“leave to amend is permitted for Trustee’s common law theories.”

Judgment on the pleadings may be granted despite earlier interlocutory rulings when the developed record and controlling law show the claims cannot proceed.

“This Court does not consider the present Motion for Judgment on the Pleadings as a motion for reconsideration; it is undertaken in the interest of correcting”

A full satisfaction of judgment can cut off later interest included in a proof of claim.

“the execution of an acknowledgement of full satisfaction of judgment stopped the accrual of any future interest.”

Cautions

A nondischargeability complaint filed on the main case docket does not necessarily satisfy the strict adversary-opening deadline.

“Rule 5005(c) does not provide a mechanism to treat the adversary complaint as timely when the adversary proceeding itself was not opened until October 28, 2025”

A late amendment request made defensively after extensive litigation may be denied for delay, prejudice, and futility.

“any amendment would create undue, unnecessary and prejudicial delay and would be futile”

Signed rulings

A grounded sample of orders signed by this judge, with the verbatim dispositive language.

Marshack v. Marich Bein LLC
8:24-ap-01040 · 2025-10-22
Motion to dismiss for failure to state claim (defendant law firm) Granted

“The aiding-and-abetting RICO theory brought under 18 U.S.C. § 2 in Count Thirteen of the SAC is dismissed without leave to amend.”

Motion to dismiss for failure to state claim (defendant law firm) Granted

“The aiding-and-abetting fraudulent-transfer and intentional tort theories in Count Thirteen of the SAC are dismissed with leave to amend.”

Motion to dismiss for failure to state claim (defendant law firm) Granted
Motion to dismiss for failure to state claim (defendant law firm) Granted

“Count Fourteen, for declaratory relief, is dismissed as derivative.”

Downs v. Steinmann
8:18-ap-01168 · 2020-11-17
Judgment on the pleadings (defendants) Granted

“The First Claim for Relief cannot be maintained. Judgment is awarded to the Defendants and against Plaintiff.”

Judgment on the pleadings (defendants) Granted

“The Second Claim for Relief cannot be maintained. Judgment is awarded to the Defendants and against the Plaintiffs.”

Judgment on the pleadings (defendants) Granted

“judgment on the pleadings in favor of the Defendants is granted with respect to the Third Claim for Relief.”

Judgment on the pleadings (defendants) Granted

“this Fourth Claim for Relief (to preserve alleged transferred property) must fail.”

Motion for leave to amend (plaintiffs) Denied

“The Court also DENIES the Plaintiffs’ Motion to Amend Complaint”

In re American Spectrum Realty, Inc.
8:15-bk-10721 · 2015-11-10
Motion for relief from stay (Texas-action plaintiffs) Granted

“relief from stay is GRANTED under § 362(d)(1), but only to allow the Texas Action to proceed to judgment.”

Motion for relief from stay (Texas-action plaintiffs) Denied

“The Plaintiffs’ request for relief from stay to setoff against the Debtor’s counterclaims, however, is DENIED.”

Motion to annul automatic stay (Texas-action plaintiffs) Granted

“Annulment is GRANTED.”

Evidentiary objection (debtor) Granted

“The Debtor’s Evidentiary Objection is GRANTED.”

Motion to enforce automatic stay (debtor) Denied

“The Court DENIES the Motion to Enforce the Stay in its entirety.”

Request for accounting (debtor) Denied

“The Debtor’s request for an accounting is also DENIED.”

Request for rule 2004 production (debtor) Denied

“the Debtor’s requests for production of documents pursuant to Rule 2004 is DENIED.”

Wadsworth Glazing, Inc. v. Pitts
6:12-ap-01191 · 2013-08-14
Summary judgment (plaintiff taxpayer) Denied

“The Plaintiff’s motion for summary adjudication is hereby denied”

Summary judgment (Internal Revenue Service) Granted

“the IRS’ motion for summary judgment is hereby granted.”

In re Floretta Wilson
6:12-bk-33437 · 2013-06-24
Objection to claimed exemption (Chapter 7 trustee) Denied

“The Trustee’s Objection is overruled with respect to the challenge to the exemptions’ validity and attachment to the Properties.”

Objection to claimed exemption (Chapter 7 trustee) Granted

“The Trustee’s Objection is sustained as to the amount of the exemptions.”

In re Rufus Suttice and Karen Dianne Polley-Suttice
6:12-bk-21006 · 2013-01-09
Motion to dismiss for abuse (United States Trustee) Denied

“The Debtors’ case should not be dismissed for abuse. Accordingly, the Motion to Dismiss is DENIED.”

Nautilus, Inc. v. Yu
6:15-ap-01153 · 2016-02-18
Summary judgment (plaintiff creditor) Granted

“The Motion for Summary Judgment is GRANTED.”

DaVania v. Costello
8:25-ap-01312 · 2026-01-21
Motion to dismiss for failure to state claim (debtor defendant) Granted

“For the foregoing reasons, the Motion is GRANTED.”

In re Steve William Nolan
6:19-bk-17161 · 2020-07-21
Objection to claimed exemption (Chapter 7 trustee) Denied

“Trustee’s Objection to Debtor’s claimed homestead exemption is hereby OVERRULED.”

In re Invensure Insurance Brokers, Inc.
8:19-bk-11889 · 2020-03-04
Objection to claim (debtor) Granted

“Thus, the Debtor's objection is SUSTAINED”

Caseload & timing

From public federal docket records for this judge.

Five sampled early-tenure matters were terminated in 132 to 299 days, with a median of 132 days. Five recently filed sampled matters remained pending. This boundary sample is descriptive and is not a complete caseload census.

Draft for Judge Clarkson with the record in hand

Ezel grounds your drafting and research in this profile: what has persuaded Judge Clarkson, and what has not, cited to the signed orders.

Opens in Ezel Pro.

  • Grounded in Judge Clarkson's own signed orders
  • Cites every source it relies on, so you can verify it
  • Chat, drafting and research in one workspace