Maureen A. Tighe

How Judge Tighe rules, drawn from 17 signed orders. Every observation links to the order it came from.

Court
U.S. Bankruptcy Court for the Central District of California
Position
Bankruptcy judge
Status
Left active service 2022
Appointed by
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Commissioned
November 24, 2003
Education
Douglass College (B.A., 1979); Rutgers Law School-Newark (J.D., 1984)
Signed orders read
17

About Judge Tighe

Maureen A. Tighe served as a United States Bankruptcy Judge for the Central District of California from November 2003 until June 2022 and later served by recall. Before joining the bench, she was the United States Trustee for the district and an Assistant United States Attorney. She earned degrees from Douglass College and Rutgers Law School.

Standing orders for every case in this court

Orders the court applies to all of its cases, whichever judge has them, as published on the court's website (checked October 10, 2026).

Key rules from these orders · The court's local rules ↗

How Judge Tighe decides

Patterns drawn from this judge's own signed orders. Every observation links to the order it came from.

Procedural preferences

In Moussighi v. Talasazan, she denied a discovery motion after finding no meaningful meet and confer and no basis for the motion.

“Because there was no meaningful meet and confer before the motion was filed and no basis for the motion, the motion is denied.”

Cautions

In Bacquet v. Aleksanyan, she denied summary judgment because the plaintiffs had not shown the intent and malicious conduct required for their nondischargeability claim.

“On summary judgment, evidence of willful intent and malicious conduct is required and so Plaintiffs have not demonstrated that they are entitled to judgment as a matter of law.”

Signed rulings

A grounded sample of orders signed by this judge, with the verbatim dispositive language.

Maria Saucedo v. Maria Estela San Vicente
1:19-ap-01123 · 2023-01-25
Summary judgment (Saucedo plaintiffs) Granted

“R. Saucedo and M. Saucedo are entitled to judgment as a matter of law under FRCP 56 that the community property discharge in Maria’s chapter 11 case does not apply under the exception of § 524(b)(2).”

Bacquet v. Aleksanyan
1:21-ap-01072 · 2022-08-19
Summary judgment (plaintiffs Charles and Victoria Bacquet) Denied

“Summary Judgment is DENIED on both the § 523(a)(2)(a) and (a)(6) causes of action because there is a material disputed fact”

Smith v. Lookofsky
1:21-ap-01018 · 2022-08-04
Summary judgment (plaintiff Craig Smith Jr.) Granted

“Summary judgment is granted as to all causes of action and all damages in Plaintiff’s complaint.”

In re Louie Esquivel Salazar
1:21-bk-11467 · 2022-06-09
Motion to avoid lien (debtor Louie Esquivel Salazar) Granted

“Debtor’s Motion(s) to Avoid Lien of Judgment Creditor Sunkin (ECF doc. 11 and 13) are GRANTED.”

In re Michael and Vanessa Stoller
1:12-bk-14347 · 2022-05-18
Objection to claim of exemption (Chapter 7 trustee Nancy Zamora) Granted

“The Court sustains Trustee’s Objection to the Action Exemption Claim.”

Weil v. The Pyramid Center, Inc. (In re Momentum Development LLC)
1:19-ap-01129 · 2022-03-30

This signed tentative ruling addressed statute-of-limitations and repose issues before trial but did not state entry of a final motion disposition.

Smith v. Lookofsky and Nachimson
1:21-ap-01018 · 2022-02-22
Summary judgment (plaintiff Craig Smith Jr.) Granted in part

“Plaintiff’s motion for partial summary judgment is granted in part and denied in part.”

Hawkeye Entertainment, LLC v. Chang
1:21-ap-01064 · 2022-01-13
Application for attorneys fees (defendants Michael Chang and related entities) Granted

“The motion for attorney’s fees is GRANTED.”

In re Claudia Cadena
1:21-bk-10082 · 2022-01-06
Motion for fees costs and damages (debtor Claudia Cadena) Granted in part

“Cadena is awarded $55,765.50 in attorney’s fees, costs, and damages against Interlandi.”

Motion for sanctions (debtor Claudia Cadena) Granted

“Cadena is also awarded $8,600.00 in sanctions against Shemtoub, payable directly to her attorney.”

In re James Alan Ritter and Debra Michelle Ritter
1:19-bk-11838 · 2021-03-05
Motion for hardship discharge (debtors James and Debra Ritter) Denied

“Debtors’ motion is denied; they may bring a motion to modify the plan.”

Gottlieb v. Gemilyan (In re Yurdumyan)
1:18-ap-01030 · 2018-08-23
Summary judgment (Chapter 7 trustee David K. Gottlieb) Granted in part

“the Motion is GRANTED as to the action under §§ 502(a) and 506(d) of the bankruptcy code pursuant to Cal. Bus. & Prof. Code § 7031(a); the Motion is DENIED as to § 7031(b) regarding the return of $1,000 plus interest; and the Motion is GRANTED as to § 7031(c).”

Moussighi v. Talasazan
1:16-ap-01119 · 2018-06-22
Summary judgment (plaintiffs Moeir and Hanrit Moussighi) Denied

“Plaintiffs’ Motion is DENIED.”

Summary judgment (debtor Yoram Talasazan) Granted in part

“Debtor’s Motion is GRANTED as to § 523(a)(2)(A) and embezzlement under § 523(a)(4), and DENIED as to fraud or defalcation while acting in a fiduciary capacity under (a)(4).”

Draft for Judge Tighe with the record in hand

Ezel grounds your drafting and research in this profile: what has persuaded Judge Tighe, and what has not, cited to the signed orders.

Opens in Ezel Pro.

  • Grounded in Judge Tighe's own signed orders
  • Cites every source it relies on, so you can verify it
  • Chat, drafting and research in one workspace