Geraldine Mund

How Judge Mund rules, drawn from 23 signed orders. Every observation links to the order it came from.

Court
U.S. Bankruptcy Court for the Central District of California
Position
Bankruptcy judge
Status
Recalled to service
Appointed by
U.S. District Court judges; later reappointed by the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Commissioned
February 9, 1984
Signed orders read
23

About Judge Mund

Geraldine Mund joined the United States Bankruptcy Court for the Central District of California in February 1984 and served as chief judge from 1997 through 2002. She has served by recall since 2011, with a term extending through December 2026. Before joining the bench, she practiced law in Beverly Hills.

Judge Mund's practices and standing orders

Rules for cases before Judge Mund, as published on the court's website (checked October 10, 2026). Judges revise these often, so confirm the current version on the court's site before you file.

Key rules

Contacting chambers

If Judge Mund’s law clerk has not contacted the movant within 48 hours of filing an emergency motion, the movant must call the law clerk.

“If the movant is not contacted by Judge Mund’s law clerk within 48 hours of filing the emergency motion, the movant shall call Judge Mund’s law clerk at (818) 587-2843.”

Motions

For an emergency hearing, file an application and proposed order, supporting declarations, and the motion papers.

“To obtain a hearing date for a motion on an emergency basis, the movant must file the following documents with the Clerk’s Office: 1. Application for an order setting the hearing date for a motion on an emergency basis and a proposed order thereon; 2. Supporting declaration(s) justifying the setting of a hearing on an emergency basis; and 3. Motion, including all supporting papers, for which the movant seeks an emergency hearing.”

Standing orders for every case in this court

Orders the court applies to all of its cases, whichever judge has them, as published on the court's website (checked October 10, 2026).

Key rules from these orders · The court's local rules ↗

How Judge Mund decides

Patterns drawn from this judge's own signed orders. Every observation links to the order it came from.

What persuades

In Ballmer v. Betancourt, Mund granted relief from judgment after finding that the earlier failure to submit evidence was excusable in that case.

“Ballmer’s failure to submit evidence of Matthew’s lack of knowledge”

In Speier v. Argent Management, Mund granted partial summary adjudication of the trustee’s restitution claim for management fees based chiefly on the agreement’s terms and earlier rulings, while leaving the voluntary-payment and incidental-benefit issues unresolved.

“However, the Court’s ruling is based primarily on the express terms of the DMA, the prior rulings of this Court, and a limited number of other facts.”

Procedural preferences

Mund’s published hearing procedures allow telephone appearances in Courtroom 303, subject to the listed exceptions.

“Telephonic appearances are allowed in all matters before Judge Mund in Courtroom 303 except the following”

A person appearing by telephone should review any posted tentative ruling before the hearing.

“each individual who appears telephonically should have reviewed the Tentative Ruling prior to the hearing”

Cautions

On the trustee’s motion to reconsider a ruling on a motion to strike, she denied relief because the trustee had not shown clear error.

“For the reasons stated, the Trustee has not persuaded the Court that there has been clear error in its ruling regarding the Motion to Strike and therefore, reconsideration is denied.”

Ordinary telephone appearances must be arranged by 3:00 p.m. on the day before the hearing unless the court approves a late request.

“The 3:00 p.m. deadline for scheduling telephonic appearances noted below”

Signed rulings

A grounded sample of orders signed by this judge, with the verbatim dispositive language.

In re Michael Robert Goland
1:15-bk-14213 · 2024-01-29
Motion to reopen (debtor Michael Robert Goland) Denied

“The motion is denied.”

Kline v. Di Bacco
1:21-ap-01010 · 2023-06-06
Motion in limine (plaintiff Michael Kline) Denied

“ORDER DENYING PLAINTIFF’S MOTION IN”

In re Shirley Foose McClure
1:13-bk-10386 · 2023-03-29
Motion for allowance of administrative expenses (debtor Shirley McClure) Granted in part

“GRANTING IN PART, DENYING IN PART,”

Zions Bancorporation, N.A. v. Licursi
1:15-ap-01236 · 2018-12-12
Nondischargeability claim (plaintiff ZB, N.A. dba California Bank & Trust) Granted

“NONDISCHARGEABLE JUDGMENT”

Nondischargeability claim under 523a4 (plaintiff ZB, N.A. dba California Bank & Trust) Denied

“the Court is granting judgment to Susan Licursi”

In re Larissa Anatolia Kenney
1:10-bk-11635 · 2018-11-16
Motion to avoid lien (debtor Larissa Anatolia Kenney) Denied

“For the foregoing reasons, the Motion is DENIED.”

In re Edwin Perry Hinds
1:06-bk-12243 · 2018-08-23
Motion to clarify (Chapter 7 trustee) Granted

“MEMORANDUM GRANTING MOTION TO”

Reitman v. McClure
1:18-ap-01050 · 2018-06-08
Summary judgment (plaintiff and Chapter 11 trustee John P. Reitman) Granted

“The Motion is granted”

In re Ronald Alvin Neff
1:11-bk-22424 · 2018-05-25
Motion for new trial (objector Douglas DeNoce) Granted in part

“Grant as to the mistake in not calling the doctors. Deny on all other grounds.”

Speier v. Argent Management, LLC
1:16-ap-01125 · 2017-11-27
Summary judgment (defendants Argent Management, LLC and SunCal Management, LLC) Granted in part

“Judgment is granted to the Defendants on the second claim for restitution and/or”

Speier v. Argent Management, LLC
1:16-ap-01120 · 2017-10-12
Motion to correct order (plaintiff and trustee Steven M. Speier) Granted in part

“The Motion is granted in part and denied in part.”

Speier v. Argent Management, LLC
1:16-ap-01120 · 2017-10-12
Motion for partial summary adjudication (plaintiff and trustee Steven M. Speier) Granted

“MEMORANDUM OF DECISION GRANTING”

Speier v. Argent Management, LLC
1:16-ap-01125 · 2017-08-02
Summary judgment (defendants Argent Management, LLC and SunCal Management, LLC) Granted in part

“This MSJ is granted in part:”

Caseload & timing

From public federal docket records for this judge.

The five terminated sampled matters lasted 487 to 824 days, with a median of 820 days. The five newest sampled matters remained pending. This boundary sample is descriptive and is not a complete caseload census.

Draft for Judge Mund with the record in hand

Ezel grounds your drafting and research in this profile: what has persuaded Judge Mund, and what has not, cited to the signed orders.

Opens in Ezel Pro.

  • Grounded in Judge Mund's own signed orders
  • Cites every source it relies on, so you can verify it
  • Chat, drafting and research in one workspace