Deborah J. Saltzman

How Judge Saltzman rules, drawn from 11 signed orders. Every observation links to the order it came from.

Court
U.S. Bankruptcy Court for the Central District of California
Position
bankruptcy
Appointed by
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Commissioned
2010-03-18
Education
Amherst College, B.A., 1991; University of Virginia School of Law, J.D., 1996
Signed orders read
11

How Judge Saltzman decides

Patterns drawn from this judge's own signed orders. Every observation links to the order it came from.

What persuades

A claim to tax priority requires a discrete transaction that gives rise to the charge, rather than a recurring fee based on continuing operations.

“that the QA Fees are an excise tax on a transaction. DHS’s claim is not entitled to priority”

A request to reject an executory contract must show a sound benefit to the estate rather than a speculative chance at a better result.

“the court cannot risk creditors’ recoveries and allow the Debtors to gamble for”

Procedural preferences

Every appearance must be registered by noon on the day before the hearing.

“All appearances – whether in person, with video, or by phone – at hearings before Judge Saltzman must be registered in advance no later than 12:00 noon the day before the hearing”

Paper judge's copies are unnecessary unless chambers specifically asks for one.

“No judge’s copy of any document is required unless a copy is requested by chambers”

Cautions

A party that does not timely register an appearance will not be allowed to attend the hearing.

“IF YOU DO NOT REGISTER, YOU WILL NOT BE PERMITTED TO ATTEND THE HEARING”

Emergency-relief filings are the exception to the court's general rule that no call to chambers is required after filing.

“does not require a call to chambers to advise that a document was filed unless it seeks emergency relief”

Signed rulings

A grounded sample of orders signed by this judge, with the verbatim dispositive language.

In re Maria Teresa Chavez
9:16-bk-10709 · 2020-08-14
Request to vacate chapter 7 and enter chapter 13 discharge (debtor Maria Teresa Chavez) Denied

“the court will not vacate the chapter 7 discharge or enter”

In re Ridgecrest Healthcare, Inc.
2:13-bk-33058 · 2017-08-24
Objection to priority claim (Chapter 7 trustee Howard Ehrenberg) Granted

“DHS’s claim is not entitled to priority”

In re John Edward Hertz and Diane Gamroth Hertz
2:15-bk-12813 · 2015-09-08
Motion to reject executory contract (debtors John Edward Hertz and Diane Gamroth Hertz) Denied

“For the foregoing reasons, the Motion is DENIED.”

In re Rosalva Lua
2:11-bk-41173 · 2015-05-01
Objection to homestead exemption (Chapter 7 trustee) Granted

“the Objection is SUSTAINED”

In re Maria Victoria Reade
2:11-bk-53726 · 2014-12-23
Objection to homestead exemption (objectors Wendy Sheinkopf and Keith Roizman) Denied

“Debtor's second amended homestead exemption are OVERRULED”

In re Robert DeGour and Lynn Randle
6:11-bk-30010 · 2012-08-24
Motion to dismiss bankruptcy case (Chapter 12 trustee) Granted

“The Motion is granted.”

Caterpillar Financial Services Corp. v. Luis Stahl
6:11-ap-01784 · 2012-08-21
Objection to discharge under 727a2 (plaintiff Caterpillar Financial Services Corp.) Denied

“denial of Defendant’s discharge under sections 727(a)(2) and (a)(4)(A).”

Objection to discharge under 727a4 (plaintiff Caterpillar Financial Services Corp.) Denied
Nondischargeability claim under 523a6 (plaintiff Caterpillar Financial Services Corp.) Denied

“nondischargeable under section 523(a)(6).”

In re David L. Farley
6:11-bk-12031 · 2011-12-15
Motion for reconsideration (Sinomax Polyurethanes (Shanghai) Co. Ltd. and Sino Century Development Ltd.) Denied

“Sinomax’s Motion is denied.”

Golden Chain, Inc. v. Babe Mines, LLC and Lawrence A. Eck
6:11-ap-01642 · 2011-07-01
Motion to dismiss or abstain (defendants Babe Mines, LLC and Lawrence A. Eck) Granted in part

“The court does not address the request to dismiss this case but grants the request”

In re Ivan J. Henderson
6:10-bk-32108 · 2010-11-05
Motion to determine value and extinguish lien (debtor Ivan J. Henderson) Denied

“The Debtor’s Motion is denied.”

Rund v. Zuckerman
6:10-ap-01276 · 2010-10-14
Motion for summary adjudication (plaintiff and Chapter 7 trustee Jason M. Rund) Granted in part

“The Motion will be granted as to the property of the estate and turnover claims”

Cross motion for summary adjudication (defendant Denise Zuckerman) Denied

“Defendant’s cross-motion for summary adjudication is denied.”

Caseload & timing

From public federal docket records for this judge.

The seven terminated sampled adversaries lasted 76 to 453 days, with a median of 153 days. One sampled adversary remained pending. The sample is useful for procedural timing but does not describe the full caseload.

Draft for Judge Saltzman with the record in hand

Ezel grounds your drafting and research in this profile: what has persuaded Judge Saltzman, and what has not, cited to the signed orders.

Opens in Ezel Pro.

  • Grounded in Judge Saltzman's own signed orders
  • Cites every source it relies on, so you can verify it
  • Chat, drafting and research in one workspace