William Healy

U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit circuit Retired 1962 · served 1937–1962 Appointed by Franklin D. Roosevelt (Democratic) 25 signed orders read

Judge Healy no longer hears cases. This profile is preserved as a historical record of how they ruled.

How Judge Healy decides

Patterns drawn from this judge's own signed orders. Every observation links to the order it came from.

What persuades

Healy treated the Board's affirmative-action authority as remedial and tested enforcement against the practical effect on collective bargaining.

“The power granted the Board to direct affirmative action is remedial, not punitive;”

He classified contractually promised dismissal pay as priority wages when the employee's right arose at discharge.

“We think no violence is done the spirit or letter of § 64(a)(2) by according preference to these claims as wages.”

Procedural preferences

Healy allowed pleadings to be amended after judgment when an issue had actually been tried without objection.

“it is entirely proper under rule 15(b), as well as under the practice long recognized by the courts generally, to permit amendments to conform to the proof; and the amendment may be made at anytime, even after judgment.”

He rejected indispensable-party treatment for a joint tortfeasor when assessing whether a counterclaim could proceed.

“And it is well established that a joint tort-feasor is not an indispensable party.”

Cautions

Healy treated a voluntary dismissal without prejudice as leaving no pending action to shelter a claim after the limitations period expired.

“a suit dismissed without prejudice pursuant to Rule 41(a) (2) leaves the situation the same as if the suit had never been brought in the first place.”

Signed rulings

A grounded sample of orders signed by this judge, with the verbatim dispositive language.

National Labor Relations Board v. Flotill Products, Inc.
11449 · 1950-02-24
Petition for enforcement (petitioner) Denied

“For these reasons we are constrained to set aside the Board's order in its entirety and to dismiss its petition.”

National Labor Relations Board v. C. W. Hume Co.
11693 · 1950-03-31
Petition for enforcement (petitioner) Granted in part

“As so modified the order will be enforced by the usual decree.”

Woods v. Brown. Woods v. Sanford
12519_1 · 1950-09-28
Appeal (appellant) Granted in part

“The order denying restitution is therefore reversed with directions to enter an order requiring a refund of the overcharges.”

United States v. Sheff
12998_1 · 1952-02-29
Appeal (appellant) Granted

“As regards denial of restitution of bonuses exacted from the tenants Rosenberg and Ross, the judgment is reversed.”

McCloskey v. Division of Labor Law Enforcement, Department of Industrial Relations, California
13102 · 1952-12-17
Appeal (appellant) Denied

“Affirmed.”

Shelley v. Union Oil Co. Of California
13300_1 · 1953-04-29
Appeal (appellant) Denied

“Affirmed.”

Stivers v. Sir Francis Drake Hotel Co., Inc.
13374 · 1953-07-14
Appeal (appellant) Denied

“Judgment affirmed.”

National Labor Relations Board v. Pierce Bros. National Labor Relations Board v. Forest Lawn Memorial-Park Ass'n, Inc
13350, 13351 · 1953-08-19
Petition for enforcement (petitioner) Granted

“Decrees will be entered enforcing the Board’s orders as prayed.”

Feuer v. United States
13837 · 1953-12-21
Appeal (appellant) Denied

“Affirmed.”

Wilson v. Northwest Marine Iron Works
13521_1 · 1954-05-05
Appeal (appellant) Denied

“The judgment is affirmed.”

New York Life Insurance Company, a Corporation v. Laveda Noonan
13960 · 1954-10-26
Appeal (appellant) Granted

“Reversed.”

Henry Thol v. United States
14041_1 · 1954-12-21
Appeal (appellant) Denied

“Judgment affirmed.”

Caseload & timing

From public federal docket records for this judge.

Not applicable to this circuit-court record.

A historical record

Judge Healy no longer hears cases. This profile stays available as a record of how they ruled. If you're preparing for a matter, start from the court's current bench.