Susan P. Graber

“Reviewing de novo ... we uphold the statute against this Second Amendment challenge.”

“We now deny the petition for review.”

“The panel affirmed a sentence for reentry after removal and without permission, in violation of 8 U.S.C. 1326.”

“On remand from the United States Supreme Court, the panel granted Pedro Madrigal-Barcenas' petition for review of the Board of Immigration Appeals' decision finding him inadmissible on the ground that his Nevada state law conviction for possessing drug paraphernalia constituted a conviction for violation of a law relating to a controlled substance.”

“We review de novo ... and reverse and remand. We hold that federal, rather than California, privilege law applies.”

“The panel granted Roberto Solorio-Ruiz's petition for review of the Board of Immigration Appeals' decision, holding that his conviction for carjacking under California Penal Code 215(a) is not a crime of violence aggravated felony under 8 U.S.C. 1101(a)(43)(F) ... and remanded”

“The panel dismissed a petition for review as to the United States Merit Systems Protection Board; and denied in part, granted in part, and remanded the petition for review as to the United States Department of the Army”

“The panel denied a petition for review in an action brought by a senior auditor at the Defense Contract Audit Agency ("DCAA") under the Whistleblower Protection Act against the Department of Defense”

“Affirming the district court's summary judgment in favor of the defendant in an action under the Telephone Consumer Protection Act, the panel held that the plaintiff consented to receive quality assurance calls when she signed a health insurance enrollment form.”

“The panel affirmed the district court's imposition of supervised release conditions requiring that the defendant participate in a sex offense-specific assessment and that, if recommended by a probation officer, he submit to polygraph testing in conjunction with the assessment.”

“The panel denied a petition for review of the Board of Immigration Appeals' denial of Martinez-de Ryan's application for cancellation of removal on the ground that she was convicted of a crime involving moral turpitude.”

“The panel denied in part and granted in part a petition for review of the Board of Immigration Appeals' final order of removal, holding that the statutory phrase "particularly serious crime," as set forth in 8 U.S.C. 1231(b)(3)(B), is not unconstitutionally vague on its face.”