Sidney Runyan Thomas

U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit circuit Senior status Appointed by Bill Clinton (Democratic) 26 signed orders read

How Judge Thomas decides

Patterns drawn from this judge's own signed orders. Every observation links to the order it came from.

What persuades

Requires a documented, stepwise assessment when an agency evaluates mental impairments.

“We reverse the judgment of the district court with instructions to remand to the ALJ to conduct a proper review of Keyser’s mental impairments.”

Requires specific intent before applying the bankruptcy discharge exception for willful tax evasion.

“we vacate the judgment and remand so that the courts can reanalyze the case using the specific intent standard”

Procedural preferences

Returns preserved procedural claims to the agency when the agency failed to decide them.

“We therefore remand to the BIA for determination of the claim that Montes-Lopez’s right to counsel was violated at the proceedings before the IJ.”

Leaves unresolved questions for the trial court's first-instance analysis rather than deciding them on an incomplete record.

“We remand to allow the district court to conduct such an analysis in the first instance. We do not prejudge the outcome of that inquiry.”

Cautions

Does not create a federal common-law remedy where the governing field has been displaced and the solution belongs to the political branches.

“the solution to Kivalina’s dire circumstance must rest in the hands of the legislative and executive branches of our government, not the federal common law”

Signed rulings

A grounded sample of orders signed by this judge, with the verbatim dispositive language.

Ruelas v. County of Alameda
· 2024-07-26
Appeal (defendants-appellants) Granted

“We reverse the district court’s order denying the motion to dismiss Plaintiffs’ claims arising under section 1194 of the California Labor Code. REVERSED.”

Perez v. Discover Bank
· 2023-07-24
Appeal (defendant-appellant) Denied

“Because the parties here did not form an agreement to arbitrate, we resolve this appeal without determining whether the Citibank agreement’s delegation clause would otherwise require an arbitrator to determine the scope or enforceability of the arbitration provision. AFFIRMED.”

McKnight v. Uber Technologies, Inc.
· 2022-11-30
Appeal (objectors-appellants) Denied

“the district court correctly concluded that the Settlement was not a coupon settlement within the meaning of CAFA, and did not abuse its discretion in making the fee award. AFFIRMED.”

Planet Aid, Inc. v. Reveal
· 2022-08-11
Appeal (plaintiffs-appellants) Denied

“We therefore affirm the district court’s grant of the Reporters’ motion to strike the complaint under California’s anti-SLAPP statute. AFFIRMED.”

Online Merchants Guild v. Maduros
· 2022-11-09
Appeal (plaintiff-appellant) Denied

“having concluded that federal jurisdiction is constrained by the TIA, there is no need for us to reach that issue. AFFIRMED.”

Clark v. Broomfield
· 2023-10-10
Appeal (habeas petitioner-appellant) Denied

“We affirm the judgment of the district court denying federal habeas relief. AFFIRMED.”

In re Sienega
· 2021-12-06
Appeal (debtor-appellant) Denied

“the BAP correctly concluded that sending faxes was not the equivalent of paying taxes. Therefore, it properly affirmed the holding of the bankruptcy court that the California state taxes that Sienega owed were non-dischargeable in bankruptcy. AFFIRMED.”

Montes-Lopez v. Gonzales
· 2007-05-16
Petition for review (noncitizen-petitioner) Granted

“We therefore remand to the BIA for determination of the claim that Montes-Lopez’s right to counsel was violated at the proceedings before the IJ. PETITION GRANTED; REMANDED.”

Reyes-Torres v. Holder
· 2011-04-07
Petition for review (noncitizen-petitioner) Granted

“We conclude that it has jurisdiction and we grant the petition for review.”

Schultze v. Chandler
· 2014-08-01
Appeal (appellants) Denied

“The district court properly concluded that the bankruptcy court properly exercised jurisdiction over the malpractice claim and correctly dismissed the case on the merits. AFFIRMED.”

Nitco Holding Corp. v. Boujikian
· 2007-06-25
Appeal (plaintiff-appellant) Denied

“For these reasons, we affirm the judgment of the district court without reaching the merits of Nitco’s argument. AFFIRMED.”

Keyser v. Commissioner of Social Security
· 2011-06-01
Appeal (benefits claimant-appellant) Granted

“We reverse the judgment of the district court with instructions to remand to the ALJ to conduct a proper review of Keyser’s mental impairments. REVERSED AND REMANDED WITH INSTRUCTIONS.”

Put Judge Thomas's record to work

Ezel drafts and answers grounded in this exact profile: how Judge Thomas actually rules, not a generic AI guess.

Opens in Ezel Pro. Every answer is grounded in Judge Thomas's own signed orders and cites them.