Richard C. Tallman

U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit circuit Appointed by Bill Clinton (Democratic) 28 signed orders read

Signed rulings

A grounded sample of orders signed by this judge, with the verbatim dispositive language.

United States v. Marquez
04-30271 · 2005-07-18
Appeal (appellant (defendant Sergio Ramon Marquez)) Denied

“The district court properly denied Marquez's motion to suppress the contraband found during TSA screening.”

J & J Celcom v. AT&T Wireless Services, Inc.
05-35567 · 2007-11-20
Appeal (appellants (plaintiffs J & J Celcom and other former minority partnership-interest owners)) Denied

“AFFIRMED.”

United States v. Ruckes
08-30088 · 2009-11-09
Appeal (appellant (defendant Adrick Ruckes)) Denied

“Therefore, the evidence was properly admitted under the inevitable discovery exception to the exclusionary rule.”

United States v. Monghur
08-10351 · 2009-12-04
Appeal (appellant (defendant Brandon Monghur)) Granted

“For the foregoing reasons, we VACATE the conviction and the order denying Monghur's suppression motion and REMAND to the district court for further proceedings.”

Bylsma v. Burger King Corp.
10-36125 · 2013-02-12
Appeal (appellant (plaintiff Edward J. Bylsma)) Granted

“The Washington Supreme Court has now held that the WPLA permits relief in such circumstances, therefore we REVERSE and REMAND to permit Bylsma to amend his Complaint to conform to Washington law.”

United States v. Gonzalez-Aguilar
12-50048 · 2013-06-13
Appeal (appellant (defendant Ubaldo Gonzalez-Aguilar)) Denied

“We have jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1291, and we affirm the sentence imposed by the district court.”

United States v. Ezeta
12-10304 · 2014-05-23
Appeal (appellant (the United States; defendant-appellee Carlos Javier Ezeta)) Granted

“REVERSED AND REMANDED.”

Ezell v. United States
14-73770 · 2015-01-23
Appeal (movant (federal prisoner Terry L. Ezell, seeking authorization to file a second or successive 28 U.S.C. 2255 petition)) Denied

“For that reason, we deny Ezell's motion for certification to file another habeas corpus petition.”

United States v. Ortiz
13-30361 · 2015-01-23
Appeal (appellant (defendant Richard Anthony Ortiz)) Denied

“Since we hold the district court did not abuse its discretion in ruling on the authentication of his voice on the recordings, we affirm Ortiz's conviction.”

City of Mukilteo v. U.S. Department of Transportation
13-70385 · 2016-03-04
Petition for review (petitioners (City of Mukilteo, City of Edmonds, Save Our Communities, and others)) Denied

“PETITION FOR REVIEW DENIED.”

Stacy v. Colvin
13-36025 · 2016-06-07
Appeal (appellant (Social Security claimant Donald G. Stacy)) Denied

“We affirm the judgment of the district court.”

United States v. Prigge
15-10260 · 2016-07-29
Appeal (appellant (defendant Terance Taylor Prigge)) Denied

“Prigge's conviction is therefore AFFIRMED.”

Put Judge Tallman's record to work

Ezel drafts and answers grounded in this exact profile: how Judge Tallman actually rules, not a generic AI guess.

Opens in Ezel Pro. Every answer is grounded in Judge Tallman's own signed orders and cites them.