Paul Jeffrey Watford

U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit circuit Retired 2023 · served 2012–2023 Appointed by Barack Obama (Democratic) 34 signed orders read

Judge Watford no longer hears cases. This profile is preserved as a historical record of how they ruled.

Signed rulings

A grounded sample of orders signed by this judge, with the verbatim dispositive language.

United States v. Dominguez-Maroyoqui
13-50066 · 2014-04-07
Appeal (appellant (defendant Carlos Dominguez-Maroyoqui)) Granted

“It follows that Dominguez-Maroyoqui should not have been assessed a 'crime of violence' enhancement under U.S.S.G. Section 2L1.2(b)(1)(A). We vacate his sentence and remand for re-sentencing without the enhancement. VACATED and REMANDED.”

United States v. Mendez
13-30170 · 2014-08-26
Appeal (appellant (defendant Fidel Antonio Mendez)) Denied

“Accordingly, the district court properly denied his motion to dismiss the felon-in-possession charge.”

Fairfield-Suisun Unified School District v. California Department of Education
12-16665 · 2015-03-16
Appeal (appellants (plaintiffs Fairfield-Suisun Unified School District and Yolo County Office of Education)) Denied

“Our holding in Lake Washington controls the outcome here, for the school districts in this case stand on even weaker footing than did their counterpart in Lake Washington. ... AFFIRMED.”

America's Servicing Co. v. Schwartz-Tallard (In re Schwartz-Tallard)
12-60052 · 2015-10-14
Appeal (appellant (America's Servicing Company, mortgage servicer / creditor)) Denied

“Having reconsidered the matter, we conclude that Sternberg misconstrued the plain meaning of Section 362(k). To the extent it is inconsistent with this opinion, Sternberg is overruled. ... The judgment of the Bankruptcy Appellate Panel is AFFIRMED.”

Correo-Ruiz v. Lynch
12-72126 · 2015-12-30
Petition for review (petitioners (David and Miguel Correo-Ruiz)) Granted

“We therefore remand to the BIA with instructions to grant the brothers an opportunity to supplement the record. ... PETITION FOR REVIEW GRANTED; CASE REMANDED.”

United States v. Sims
15-10450 · 2017-03-07
Appeal (appellant (defendant Kimo Sims)) Denied

“The language of the condition is sufficiently precise to avoid the vagueness concerns we identified in Aquino, and the district court did not abuse its discretion by imposing the condition simply because it prohibits conduct also covered by one of the standard conditions of supervised release. AFFIRMED.”

Gomez-Velazco v. Sessions
16-72054 · 2018-01-10
Petition for review (petitioner (Eladio Gomez-Velazco)) Denied

“Although he may have been improperly denied the right to counsel during his initial interaction with DHS officers, he has made no showing that the denial of that right caused him any prejudice. PETITIONS FOR REVIEW DENIED.”

United States v. Kootswatewa
16-10228 · 2018-03-23
Appeal (appellant (defendant Theodore Kootswatewa)) Denied

“The evidence against Kootswatewa was compelling, and none of the charges turned on whether he 'lured' or merely 'took' K.C. into the abandoned trailer. AFFIRMED.”

United States v. County of Maricopa
15-17558 · 2018-05-07
Appeal (appellant (defendant County of Maricopa)) Denied

“In short, Maricopa County is liable for violations of Title VI and Section 12601 stemming from its own official policies. As discussed above, when Arpaio adopted the racially discriminatory traffic-stop policies at issue, he acted as a final policymaker for the County. AFFIRMED.”

Miller v. Sessions
15-72645 · 2018-05-08
Petition for review (petitioner (Dorna Alicia Miller)) Granted

“The BIA erred by holding that Section 1231(a)(5) deprived the immigration court of jurisdiction to resolve Miller's motion to reopen. We grant Miller's petition for review and remand the case so that the agency can decide Miller's motion to reopen on the merits. PETITION FOR REVIEW GRANTED; CASE REMANDED.”

United States v. Edling
16-10457 · 2018-06-08
Appeal (appellant (defendant Hans Edling)) Granted in part

“As explained below, we conclude that assault with a deadly weapon constitutes a 'crime of violence,' but that neither robbery nor coercion are covered by the Guidelines' definition of that term. We therefore vacate Edling's sentence and remand for resentencing. SENTENCE VACATED; REMANDED FOR RESENTENCING.”

United States v. Swallow
16-30224 · 2018-06-11
Appeal (appellant (defendant Paul Swallow)) Granted in part

“Because the district court erred in calculating the correct sentencing range under the Guidelines, and we cannot say the error was harmless, we must vacate Swallow's sentence and remand for resentencing. SENTENCE VACATED; REMANDED FOR RESENTENCING.”

A historical record

Judge Watford no longer hears cases. This profile stays available as a record of how they ruled. If you're preparing for a matter, start from the court's current bench.