Michelle Taryn Friedland

U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit circuit Appointed by Barack Obama (Democratic) 29 signed orders read

Signed rulings

A grounded sample of orders signed by this judge, with the verbatim dispositive language.

Marty Cortez v. Bill Skol
12-16688 · 2015-01-26
Appeal (appellant (plaintiff Marty Cortez)) Granted

“For the reasons discussed above, we REVERSE the district court's grant of summary judgment on Plaintiff's Section 1983 and gross negligence claims and REMAND for further proceedings.”

Northbay Wellness Group v. Michael Beyries
13-17381 · 2015-06-05
Appeal (appellant (Northbay Wellness Group)) Granted

“For the foregoing reasons, the bankruptcy court abused its discretion by applying the doctrine of unclean hands to bar Northbay's request for a judgment of nondischargeability. REVERSED and REMANDED.”

United States v. David Mark
13-10500 · 2015-07-31
Appeal (appellant (defendant David Mark)) Granted

“For the foregoing reasons, we reverse the district court's denial of Mark's motion to reconsider and remand with directions to dismiss the indictment. REVERSED and REMANDED.”

United States v. Aifang Ye
12-10576 · 2015-07-10
Appeal (appellant (defendant Aifang Ye)) Denied

“We hold that the crimes for which Ye was convicted are not specific intent crimes, so her challenges to the jury instructions fail. ... We therefore affirm.”

Gilberto Acosta-Olivarria v. Loretta E. Lynch
11-70392 · 2015-08-26
Petition for review (petitioner (Gilberto Acosta-Olivarria)) Granted

“For the foregoing reasons, we GRANT the petition for review and REMAND with instructions to reinstate the IJ's 2006 order granting adjustment of status.”

Glazing Health & Welfare Fund v. Michael A. Lamek
16-16155 · 2018-03-21
Appeal (appellant (plaintiff employee benefit trust funds)) Denied

“We agree with the district court that Bos v. Board of Trustees (Bos I), 795 F.3d 1006 (9th Cir. 2015) ... which held that parties to an ERISA plan cannot designate unpaid contributions as plan assets, forecloses the Trusts' claim. We therefore affirm.”

In re Regina Bozic (Bozic v. U.S. District Court)
17-70614 · 2018-04-25
Petition for review (petitioner (Regina Bozic, mandamus petitioner)) Denied

“Although we agree with Bozic that it was clear error to transfer her action to the Eastern District, issuance of the writ would have no practical impact on this case in its current procedural posture, and any injury Bozic might face is purely speculative. We therefore hold that the extraordinary remedy of mandamus is unwarranted at this time.”

United States v. Miguel Valle
18-50199 · 2019-10-09
Appeal (appellant (defendant Miguel Valle)) Granted

“But that inference is not enough to carry the Government's burden here to prove the thirteen years of continuous presence in the United States necessary to support the enhancements applied to Petitioner Miguel Valle's sentence. We therefore vacate and remand to the district court for resentencing.”

United States v. Luis Mayea-Pulido
18-50223 · 2020-01-03
Appeal (appellant (defendant Luis Mayea-Pulido)) Denied

“We disagree and affirm Mayea's conviction.”

Michael Kaiser v. Cascade Capital, LLC
19-35151 · 2021-03-09
Appeal (appellant (plaintiff Michael Kaiser)) Granted

“Because the district court held the opposite, we reverse and remand for further proceedings.”

Confederated Tribes and Bands of the Yakama Nation v. Klickitat County
19-35807 (consolidated with 19-35821) · 2021-06-11
Appeal (appellant/cross-appellant (parties challenging the district court's judgment for the Yakama Nation)) Denied

“Following a bench trial, the district court held that the Yakama Reservation includes a 121,465.69-acre tract ('Tract D') that partially overlaps with Klickitat County. We affirm.”

Paul Miskey v. Kilolo Kijakazi
20-16597 · 2022-05-03
Appeal (appellant (plaintiff Paul Miskey)) Granted in part

“The panel affirmed in part and reversed in part the district court's decision remanding plaintiff's case to the Social Security Administration ... The panel held that the GPO applied to plaintiff's spousal benefits, but that a remand to the agency was needed to determine whether SSA was entitled to recoupment for overpayment of benefits paid without the offset.”

Put Judge Friedland's record to work

Ezel drafts and answers grounded in this exact profile: how Judge Friedland actually rules, not a generic AI guess.

Opens in Ezel Pro. Every answer is grounded in Judge Friedland's own signed orders and cites them.