Mary M. Schroeder

U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit circuit Appointed by Jimmy Carter (Democratic) 38 signed orders read

Signed rulings

A grounded sample of orders signed by this judge, with the verbatim dispositive language.

United States v. Selfa
· 1990-12-07
Appeal (appellant (defendant Phillip Dale Selfa)) Denied

“AFFIRMED.”

FDIC v. Letterman Brothers
· 1992-12-08
Appeal (appellant (FDIC, as receiver for BancTexas Dallas)) Moot / procedural

“We therefore DISMISS this appeal for lack of an appealable judgment.”

State of Nevada v. United States Department of Energy
· 1993-05-24
Petition for review (petitioner (State of Nevada)) Denied

“The petition for review is DENIED.”

Government of Guam v. Superior Court of Guam
· 1993-07-14
Appeal (appellant (real party in interest Guam Dai-Ichi Hotel, Inc.)) Denied

“Accordingly, the order of the Appellate Division is AFFIRMED.”

United States v. Seaman
· 1994-03-04
Appeal (appellants (defendants Lloyd Clint Seaman and Elwood Wayne Hage)) Granted

“REVERSED.”

Kesselring v. F/T Arctic Hero
· 1994-07-22
Appeal (appellant (intervenor Aizawa Gyogyo, K.K.)) Denied

“Because the district court applied the correct legal standards, and its findings are not clearly erroneous nor materially disputed, we affirm the district court’s judgment.”

United States v. Narramore
· 1994-09-21
Appeal (appellant (defendant Robert Preston Narramore)) Denied

“AFFIRMED.”

Sequeira-Solano v. INS
· 1997-01-06
Petition for review (petitioner (Javier Sequeira-Solano)) Denied

“The petition for review is DENIED.”

United States v. Bailey
· 1998-03-17
Appeal (appellant (defendant Weince Bailey)) Denied

“AFFIRMED.”

Contreras v. Schiltgen
· 1998-08-07
Appeal (appellant (petitioner Jose Contreras)) Denied

“AFFIRMED.”

Laxmi Investments, LLC v. Golf USA
· 1999-09-30
Appeal (appellant (plaintiff Laxmi Investments, LLC)) Granted

“We REVERSE the decision of the district court and REMAND for the entry of an order that arbitration shall proceed in California.”

Berger v. Hanlon
· 1999-11-04
Appeal (appellants (plaintiffs Paul W. and Erma R. Berger)) Granted in part

“AFFIRMED IN PART, REVERSED IN PART, AND REMANDED IN PART FOR FURTHER PROCEEDINGS.”

Put Judge Schroeder's record to work

Ezel drafts and answers grounded in this exact profile: how Judge Schroeder actually rules, not a generic AI guess.

Opens in Ezel Pro. Every answer is grounded in Judge Schroeder's own signed orders and cites them.