Lucy Haeran Koh
How Judge Koh rules, drawn from 25 signed orders. Every observation links to the order it came from.
Signed rulings
A grounded sample of orders signed by this judge, with the verbatim dispositive language.
“We hold that 18 U.S.C. § 1589(a) lists alternative factual means, about which the jurors did not need to agree unanimously so long as they unanimously agreed that Barai and Kartan knowingly obtained forced labor by prohibited means. ... AFFIRMED.”
“The judgment of the district court is reversed, and we remand for further proceedings consistent with this opinion. REVERSED.”
“We grant the petition for review and remand to the BIA for further proceedings consistent with this opinion.”
“the panel affirmed the district court's grant of a preliminary injunction in favor of plaintiffs on their Eighth Amendment claim as to the City's new arguments regarding the geographic and time limitations of some of the enjoined ordinances”
“the panel reversed the district court's judgment in favor of Sutter Health, the operator of a healthcare system, on Plaintiffs' claims alleging that Sutter has abused its market power in the region to charge supracompetitive rates”
“We agree with the district court and every other Court of Appeals to consider this question that an objective recklessness standard is appropriate, and we affirm.”
“We conclude that 7 U.S.C. § 2156 and its 2018 Amendment apply to the CNMI. Accordingly, we affirm.”
“For the reasons set forth below, we deny the petition.”
“We conclude the Government has shown neither a likelihood of success on the merits nor irreparable injury absent a stay and accordingly deny the Government's motion.”
“The panel granted two petitions for writs of mandamus brought under the CVRA, § 3771(d)(3), and remanded for further consideration in the district court as to whether Petitioners met the requirements to reopen restitution proceedings set forth in the MVRA, § 3664(d)(5).”
“For the reasons set forth below, we agree in part and remand to EPA for further proceedings.”
“We hold that they are afforded substantive due process protections, and therefore, we reverse.”
Draft for Judge Koh with the record in hand
Ezel grounds your drafting and research in this profile: what has persuaded Judge Koh, and what has not, cited to the signed orders.
Opens in Ezel Pro.
- Grounded in Judge Koh's own signed orders
- Cites every source it relies on, so you can verify it
- Chat, drafting and research in one workspace