Kenneth Kiyul Lee

How Judge Lee rules, drawn from 36 signed orders. Every observation links to the order it came from.

Court
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Position
Circuit judge
Appointed by
Donald J. Trump (Republican)
Commissioned
June 12, 2019
Education
Cornell University (B.A., summa cum laude, 1997); Harvard Law School (J.D., magna cum laude, 2000)
Signed orders read
36

About Judge Lee

Kenneth Kiyul Lee is a judge of the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit. Appointed by President Donald J. Trump, Judge Lee received a commission on June 12, 2019.

Judge Lee's practices and standing orders

The court's website lists no individual practices or standing orders of Judge Lee's own (checked October 11, 2026), so the court's local rules and general orders are the place to look (court page ↗).

Standing orders for every case in this court

Orders the court applies to all of its cases, whichever judge has them, as published on the court's website (checked October 11, 2026).

Key rules from these orders · The court's local rules ↗

Signed rulings

A grounded sample of orders signed by this judge, with the verbatim dispositive language.

San Francisco Taxi Coalition v. City & County of San Francisco
19-16439 · 2020-11-09
Appeal (appellants (taxi drivers and the San Francisco Taxi Coalition)) Denied

“The district court granted the government's motion for judgment on the pleadings, ruling that the taxi drivers failed to state plausible claims. We affirm. The rules are rationally related to the legitimate government interests of aiding beleaguered taxi drivers and easing taxi congestion at the airport.”

Greenberg v. Target Corp.
19-16699 · 2021-01-13
Appeal (appellant (plaintiff Todd Greenberg, on behalf of a putative class)) Denied

“We thus hold that the FDCA authorizes the defendants’ structure/function claim about biotin and preempts Greenberg’s state law claims challenging them.”

Prodanova v. H.C. Wainwright & Co.
19-56048 · 2021-04-08
Appeal (appellant (lead plaintiff Panthera Investment Fund L.P.)) Denied

“The district court’s order granting the defendants’ motion to dismiss is AFFIRMED.”

Briseno v. Henderson
19-56297 · 2021-06-01
Appeal (objector-appellant (class member M. Todd Henderson)) Granted

“We REVERSE the district court’s approval of the settlement, and REMAND this case for further proceedings consistent with this opinion.”

Ortiz Narez v. Garland
19-72039 · 2022-02-16
Petition for review (petitioner (Jose Antonio Ortiz Narez)) Denied

“PETITION FOR REVIEW IS DENIED.”

Weston Family Partnership LLLP v. Twitter, Inc.
20-17465 · 2022-03-23
Appeal (appellants (plaintiff Twitter investors)) Denied

“Twitter's statements about its advertising program were not false or misleading because they were qualified and factually true. The company had no duty to disclose any more than it did under federal securities law. We thus affirm the district court's dismissal of the lawsuit.”

Greenwood v. Garland
17-72389 · 2022-06-16
Petition for review (petitioner (Garfield Greenwood)) Denied

“We DENY in part Greenwood's petition as to his motion to reopen based on changed country conditions, and DISMISS in part his petition seeking review of the BIA's exercise of its sua sponte discretion.”

Rivera Vega v. Garland
19-71750 · 2022-07-08
Petition for review (petitioner (Jorge Rivera Vega)) Denied

“We thus DENY Rivera Vega’s petition for review.”

United States v. Hernandez-Garcia
20-50228 · 2022-08-17
Appeal (appellant (defendant Clemente Hernandez-Garcia)) Denied

“We thus reject Hernandez-Garcia's claim that the U.S. Marines' surveillance at the border violated the Posse Comitatus Act. We also deny Hernandez-Garcia's Batson challenge because he failed to rebut the prosecution's race-neutral reasons for striking two Asian jurors. We affirm Hernandez-Garcia's conviction.”

Singh v. Garland
19-73107 · 2022-08-30
Petition for review (petitioner (Rupinder Singh)) Granted

“The BIA thus erred in holding that the earlier adverse credibility finding barred Singh's motion to reopen. The BIA also erroneously concluded that Singh failed to show that the conditions for Sikhs in India changed qualitatively since his last hearing. ... We thus grant the petition and remand.”

Borden v. eFinancial, LLC
21-35746 · 2022-11-16
Appeal (appellant (plaintiff David Borden, on behalf of a putative class)) Denied

“We hold that an 'automatic telephone dialing system' must generate and dial random or sequential telephone numbers under the TCPA's plain text. ... eFinancial thus has not used an autodialer, and its texts to Borden do not implicate the TCPA. We thus affirm the district court's dismissal of the lawsuit.”

Amador Duenas v. Garland
18-71987 · 2023-07-27
Petition for review (petitioner (Fortunato de Jesus Amador Duenas, pro se)) Denied

“We hold that the appointment and removal process for Immigration Judges and members of the BIA comports with Article II of our Constitution. For these reasons ... we DENY Amador Duenas's petition for review.”

Draft for Judge Lee with the record in hand

Ezel grounds your drafting and research in this profile: what has persuaded Judge Lee, and what has not, cited to the signed orders.

Opens in Ezel Pro.

  • Grounded in Judge Lee's own signed orders
  • Cites every source it relies on, so you can verify it
  • Chat, drafting and research in one workspace