Jennifer Sung

How Judge Sung rules, drawn from 23 signed orders. Every observation links to the order it came from.

Court
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Position
circuit
Appointed by
Joseph Biden (Democratic)
Commissioned
2021-12-20
Education
Oberlin College (B.A., politics, with honors, 1994); Yale Law School (J.D., 2004)
Signed orders read
23

How Judge Sung decides

Patterns drawn from this judge's own signed orders. Every observation links to the order it came from.

What persuades

In a tribal hunting-rights appeal, Sung read the treaty in historical context and as the tribes would naturally have understood it. She would not add an unwritten reservation-residence condition to a right the tribes had expressly reserved.

“The Treaty's terms, which we must read in context and construe as they would naturally be understood by the Tribes, plainly do not condition exercise of the reserved hunting right on the Northwestern Band relocating to a reservation.”

In a maritime-negligence appeal, Sung treated evidence of earlier similar accidents as one way, but not the exclusive way, to prove that a defendant knew or should have known a condition was unreasonably dangerous.

“we clarify that proof of similar incidents is relevant to show actual or constructive knowledge of unreasonable dangerousness, but not required.”

In an employment-arbitration appeal, Sung upheld refusal to sever multiple unconscionable provisions after the trial court considered the agreement and the relevant remedial factors as a whole.

“The district court appropriately considered all the relevant factors and did not abuse its discretion in finding sufficient evidence that the agreement is permeated with unconscionability and declining to sever the unconscionable terms.”

Procedural preferences

In a disability-benefits appeal, Sung confined judicial review to the rationale the administrative law judge actually gave. A reviewing court could not uphold the agency by supplying a conservative-treatment rationale absent from its decision.

“[W]e can affirm the agency's decision to deny benefits only on the grounds invoked by the agency.”

Cautions

In a criminal appeal involving a racially biased juror who participated in deliberations but was removed before the verdict was accepted, Sung applied a heavy presumption of prejudice and placed the burden of rebuttal on the government.

“For the reasons discussed below, we conclude that the Remmer presumption-of-prejudice standard applies where, as here, a biased juror was present on the jury but excused before the verdict was accepted.”

In her Holcomb dissent, Sung distinguished information discovered during execution of a valid warrant from information learned before execution and would assess the officers’ continuation under objective reasonableness.

“In my view, this line of cases does not require the police to stop searching and report back to the magistrate when the police learn new information that undermines probable cause while executing the warrant.”

Signed rulings

A grounded sample of orders signed by this judge, with the verbatim dispositive language.

United States v. Lonnie Lillard
18-30106; 18-30114; 20-30110 · 2023-01-17
Appeal (appellant (defendant Lonnie Eugene Lillard)) Granted in part

“AFFIRMED in part, VACATED in part, and REMANDED in part.”

Hermosillo v. Garland (Eric Blancas Hermosillo v. Merrick B. Garland)
18-71220 · 2023-09-14
Petition for review (petitioner (Eric Blancas Hermosillo, native and citizen of Mexico)) Granted

“We grant the petition for review and remand so that Blancas Hermosillo may receive a merits hearing. ... PETITION FOR REVIEW GRANTED AND REMANDED with instructions.”

Northwestern Band of the Shoshone Nation v. Wooten
22-35140 · 2023-10-17
Appeal (plaintiff-appellant (Northwestern Band of the Shoshone Nation, a federally recognized Indian tribe)) Granted

“Accordingly, we reverse the district court's dismissal of the Northwestern Band's complaint for failure to state a claim under Rule 12(b)(6). ... REVERSED AND REMANDED.”

Kava Holdings, LLC v. NLRB
21-70225 (consolidated with 21-70638, 21-71334) · 2023-10-18
Petition for review (petitioner (Kava Holdings, LLC, dba Hotel Bel-Air)) Denied

“We DENY Kava's petition for review, except for the arguments that we DISMISS for lack of jurisdiction because Kava failed to raise them below. We GRANT the Board's cross-petition, and we enforce the Board's order in full. PETITION DENIED IN PART, DISMISSED IN PART; CROSS-PETITION GRANTED.”

Paul Maney v. Kate Brown
22-35218; 22-35219 · 2024-02-01
Appeal (Defendants-Appellants Kate Brown (Oregon Governor) and Patrick Allen (Director of the Oregon Health Authority), appealing on interlocutory appeal the district court's denial of their motions to dismiss (asserting PREP Act immunity)) Granted

“We reverse the district court's denial of Brown's and Allen's motions to dismiss that claim and remand for further proceedings consistent with this opinion. REVERSED and REMANDED.”

Katherine Blumenkron v. Multnomah County
21-35987 · 2024-02-02
Appeal (Plaintiffs-Appellants Katherine Blumenkron, David Blumenkron, and Springville Investors, LLC, appealing the district court's dismissal of, and abstention from, their constitutional challenges to the 'rural reserve' designation of their land) Denied

“The district court appropriately abstained from exercising jurisdiction over Plaintiffs’ as-applied claims under Burford. We also affirm the district court’s dismissal of Plaintiffs’ facial constitutional claims for failure to state a claim as a matter of law. AFFIRMED.”

Danny Ferguson v. Martin O'Malley
21-35412 · 2024-03-14
Appeal (Plaintiff-Appellant Danny Ray Ferguson (Social Security claimant), appealing the district court judgment affirming the ALJ's denial of disability benefits) Granted

“REVERSED AND REMANDED.”

Robert Conway v. Martin O'Malley
22-35427 · 2024-03-26
Appeal (Plaintiff-Appellant Robert Conway (Social Security claimant), appealing the district court judgment upholding the ALJ's denial of disability benefits) Granted

“REVERSED AND REMANDED.”

Nakka v. USCIS (Nagendra Kumar Nakka, et al. v. U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services; U.S. Department of State)
22-35203 · 2024-08-06
Appeal (plaintiffs-appellants (Nagendra Kumar Nakka et al.; putative class of Indian-national work-visa holders and their derivative-beneficiary children)) Moot / procedural

“Accordingly, we vacate the district court order and remand with instructions to dismiss this case for lack of jurisdiction. ... VACATED AND REMANDED.”

Jose Ronderos v. USF Reddaway, Inc.
21-55685 · 2024-08-22
Appeal (Defendants-Appellants USF Reddaway, Inc. and Yellow Corporation (the employer), appealing the district court's denial of their motion to compel arbitration) Denied

“Therefore, the district court appropriately declined to sever the unconscionable provisions and enforce the remainder of the agreement. AFFIRMED.”

Michael Mayes v. American Hallmark Insurance Co. of Texas
22-35075 · 2024-08-22
Appeal (Plaintiff-Appellant Michael Mayes (pro se), appealing the district court's denial of his motion to remand his removed action to state court) Denied

“In sum, we hold that formal service is not a prerequisite to removal under § 1446(b)(1). Therefore, removal was proper in this case, and the district court correctly denied Mayes’ motion to remand. AFFIRMED.”

In re Powell (TICO Construction Company, Inc. v. Van Meter)
22-60052 (BAP No. 22-1014) · 2024-10-01
Appeal (appellant (creditor TICO Construction Company, Inc.)) Denied

“In this appeal, TICO argues that the bankruptcy court abused its discretion by declining to resolve TICO's challenge to Powell's eligibility before granting his § 1307(b) motion to dismiss. For the reasons explained below, we conclude that the bankruptcy court did not err, and we affirm.”

Draft for Judge Sung with the record in hand

Ezel grounds your drafting and research in this profile: what has persuaded Judge Sung, and what has not, cited to the signed orders.

Opens in Ezel Pro.

  • Grounded in Judge Sung's own signed orders
  • Cites every source it relies on, so you can verify it
  • Chat, drafting and research in one workspace