Joseph Clifford Wallace

How Judge Wallace rules, drawn from 34 signed orders. Every observation links to the order it came from.

Court
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Position
Circuit judge
Status
Senior status
Appointed by
Richard Nixon (Republican)
Commissioned
June 28, 1972
Education
San Diego State University (B.A., 1952); University of California, Berkeley, School of Law (LL.B., 1955)
Signed orders read
34

About Judge Wallace

John Clifford Wallace is a judge of the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit. Appointed by President Richard M. Nixon, Judge Wallace received a commission on June 28, 1972. Judge Wallace previously served on the United States District Court for the Southern District of California, commissioned there on October 16, 1970. Judge Wallace assumed senior status on April 8, 1996.

Judge Wallace's practices and standing orders

The court's website lists no individual practices or standing orders of Judge Wallace's own (checked October 11, 2026), so the court's local rules and general orders are the place to look (court page ↗).

Standing orders for every case in this court

Orders the court applies to all of its cases, whichever judge has them, as published on the court's website (checked October 11, 2026).

Key rules from these orders · The court's local rules ↗

Signed rulings

A grounded sample of orders signed by this judge, with the verbatim dispositive language.

United States v. Fritts
· 1974-11-15
Appeal (appellant (defendant Richard Ernest Fritts)) Denied

“We affirm.”

McKeand v. Laird
· 1974-01-30
Appeal (appellant (plaintiff Robert Wallace McKeand)) Denied

“Summary judgment was entered against him from which he appeals. We affirm.”

Morales-Alvarado v. Immigration and Naturalization Service
· 1981-08-28
Petition for review (petitioner (Leonel Morales-Alvarado)) Moot / procedural

“Therefore, we conclude that this appeal is moot and it is dismissed.”

Hannon v. Security National Bank
· 1976-03-18
Appeal (appellant (plaintiff Neill Hannon)) Denied

“From this part of the judgment he appeals and we affirm.”

Alonzo v. ACF Property Management, Inc.
· 1981-04-22
Appeal (appellant (plaintiff Joaquin Alonzo)) Granted in part

“AFFIRMED IN PART; REVERSED AND REMANDED IN PART.”

Willis v. United States
· 1980-03-13
Appeal (appellant (movant Vincent Ray Willis)) Denied

“AFFIRMED.”

Naas v. Stolman
96-16789 · 1997-12-09
Appeal (appellants (plaintiffs Richard and Janet Naas)) Denied

“We affirm and hold that the Naases' action is barred by the statute of limitations.”

Payne v. Norwest Corporation
95-36252 · 1997-05-15
Appeal (appellant (plaintiff RadLee Payne)) Granted in part

“AFFIRMED IN PART, REVERSED IN PART, AND REMANDED.”

Ghana v. Pearce
97-35588 · 1998-11-05
Appeal (appellant (plaintiff Emory M. Ghana)) Denied

“As the Compact is not federal law and does not create a constitutionally protected liberty interest, we hold that a violation the Compact cannot be the basis for a section 1983 action.”

United States v. Gonzalez-Mendez
· 1998-07-14
Appeal (appellant (defendant Eduardo Gonzalez-Mendez)) Denied

“Therefore, we hold that domestic crimes for which the term of imprisonment was completed more than 15 years prior to sentencing do trigger the 16-level enhancement of U.S.S.G. § 2L1.2(b)(2).”

Munoz v. Rowland
· 1997-01-15
Appeal (appellant (petitioner Phillip Munoz)) Moot / procedural

“Because all of Munoz's claims are moot, this appeal is dismissed.”

United States v. Sideman & Bancroft, LLP
11-15930 · 2013-01-08
Appeal (appellant (Sideman & Bancroft, LLP)) Denied

“We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291, and we affirm.”

Draft for Judge Wallace with the record in hand

Ezel grounds your drafting and research in this profile: what has persuaded Judge Wallace, and what has not, cited to the signed orders.

Opens in Ezel Pro.

  • Grounded in Judge Wallace's own signed orders
  • Cites every source it relies on, so you can verify it
  • Chat, drafting and research in one workspace