Joseph Clifford Wallace
How Judge Wallace rules, drawn from 29 signed orders. Every observation links to the order it came from.
Signed rulings
A grounded sample of orders signed by this judge, with the verbatim dispositive language.
“Summary judgment was entered against him from which he appeals. We affirm.”
“Therefore, we conclude that this appeal is moot and it is dismissed.”
“From this part of the judgment he appeals and we affirm.”
“AFFIRMED IN PART; REVERSED AND REMANDED IN PART.”
“We affirm and hold that the Naases' action is barred by the statute of limitations.”
“AFFIRMED IN PART, REVERSED IN PART, AND REMANDED.”
“As the Compact is not federal law and does not create a constitutionally protected liberty interest, we hold that a violation the Compact cannot be the basis for a section 1983 action.”
“Therefore, we hold that domestic crimes for which the term of imprisonment was completed more than 15 years prior to sentencing do trigger the 16-level enhancement of U.S.S.G. § 2L1.2(b)(2).”
“Because all of Munoz's claims are moot, this appeal is dismissed.”
“We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291, and we affirm.”
Draft for Judge Wallace with the record in hand
Ezel grounds your drafting and research in this profile: what has persuaded Judge Wallace, and what has not, cited to the signed orders.
Opens in Ezel Pro.
- Grounded in Judge Wallace's own signed orders
- Cites every source it relies on, so you can verify it
- Chat, drafting and research in one workspace