Joseph Clifford Wallace

U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit circuit Appointed by Richard Nixon (Republican) 26 signed orders read

Signed rulings

A grounded sample of orders signed by this judge, with the verbatim dispositive language.

United States v. Fritts
· 1974-11-15
Appeal (appellant (defendant Richard Ernest Fritts)) Denied

“We affirm.”

McKeand v. Laird
· 1974-01-30
Appeal (appellant (plaintiff Robert Wallace McKeand)) Denied

“Summary judgment was entered against him from which he appeals. We affirm.”

Morales-Alvarado v. Immigration and Naturalization Service
· 1981-08-28
Petition for review (petitioner (Leonel Morales-Alvarado)) Moot / procedural

“Therefore, we conclude that this appeal is moot and it is dismissed.”

Hannon v. Security National Bank
· 1976-03-18
Appeal (appellant (plaintiff Neill Hannon)) Denied

“From this part of the judgment he appeals and we affirm.”

Alonzo v. ACF Property Management, Inc.
· 1981-04-22
Appeal (appellant (plaintiff Joaquin Alonzo)) Granted in part

“AFFIRMED IN PART; REVERSED AND REMANDED IN PART.”

Willis v. United States
· 1980-03-13
Appeal (appellant (movant Vincent Ray Willis)) Denied

“AFFIRMED.”

Naas v. Stolman
96-16789 · 1997-12-09
Appeal (appellants (plaintiffs Richard and Janet Naas)) Denied

“We affirm and hold that the Naases' action is barred by the statute of limitations.”

Payne v. Norwest Corporation
95-36252 · 1997-05-15
Appeal (appellant (plaintiff RadLee Payne)) Granted in part

“AFFIRMED IN PART, REVERSED IN PART, AND REMANDED.”

Ghana v. Pearce
97-35588 · 1998-11-05
Appeal (appellant (plaintiff Emory M. Ghana)) Denied

“As the Compact is not federal law and does not create a constitutionally protected liberty interest, we hold that a violation the Compact cannot be the basis for a section 1983 action.”

United States v. Gonzalez-Mendez
· 1998-07-14
Appeal (appellant (defendant Eduardo Gonzalez-Mendez)) Denied

“Therefore, we hold that domestic crimes for which the term of imprisonment was completed more than 15 years prior to sentencing do trigger the 16-level enhancement of U.S.S.G. § 2L1.2(b)(2).”

Munoz v. Rowland
· 1997-01-15
Appeal (appellant (petitioner Phillip Munoz)) Moot / procedural

“Because all of Munoz's claims are moot, this appeal is dismissed.”

United States v. Sideman & Bancroft, LLP
11-15930 · 2013-01-08
Appeal (appellant (Sideman & Bancroft, LLP)) Denied

“We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291, and we affirm.”

Put Judge Wallace's record to work

Ezel drafts and answers grounded in this exact profile: how Judge Wallace actually rules, not a generic AI guess.

Opens in Ezel Pro. Every answer is grounded in Judge Wallace's own signed orders and cites them.