Ferdinand F. Fernandez

U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit circuit Appointed by George H. W. Bush (Republican) 32 signed orders read

Signed rulings

A grounded sample of orders signed by this judge, with the verbatim dispositive language.

United States v. Harvey
11-50268 · 2011-11-03
Appeal (appellant (defendant Roshaja Harvey)) Denied

“Whatever else “order” might mean under § 844(a) of the Controlled Substances Act, it does not include a mere recommendation from a physician pursuant to the Compassionate Use Act.”

Hunton v. Sinclair
· 2013-10-11
Appeal (appellant (habeas petitioner Luke Hunton)) Denied

“While Hunton agrees, as he must, that he did procedurally default on his Brady claim, he asserts that he may still pursue it because he was deprived of counsel at his post-conviction relief proceeding.”

Grantham v. Cory
· 2011-07-25
Appeal (appellants (Gregory Grantham and John Saba)) Denied

“Therefore, we agree with the district court’s ultimate determination and affirm the bankruptcy court’s decision with the clarification and exception noted above.”

United States v. Nunez-Rodelo
· 2004-07-29
Appeal (appellant (defendant Ramon Nunez-Rodelo)) Denied

“We hold that his arguments about the differences between “deported” and “removed” fail to protect him from the strictures of § 1326(b)(2).”

United States v. Sesma-Hernandez
· 2000-08-02
Appeal (appellant (defendant Conrado Sesma-Hernandez)) Denied

“AFFIRMED.”

Vander v. U.S. Department of Justice
· 2001-10-09
Appeal (appellant (plaintiff Charles M. Vander)) Denied

“Logic offers some support for his position, but law does not.”

Speiser, Krause & Madole P.C. v. Ortiz
· 2001-11-21
Appeal (appellant (defendant Rudy A. Ortiz)) Denied

“However, his neglect of one clear rule is no anodyne for the damage caused by neglect of another one.”

United States v. Daniels
· 1999-10-21
Appeal (appellant (defendant Earthy D. Daniels, Jr.)) Denied

“We review denials of petitions under 28 U.S.C. § 2255 de novo.”

United States v. Battles
· 2004-03-30
Appeal (appellant (defendant Brian Keith Battles)) Granted in part

“We affirm in part, reverse in part, and remand.”

Myers v. American Triumph F/V
· 2001-08-13
Appeal (appellant (plaintiff Rick L. Myers, class)) Denied

“Myers appealed, and we affirm.”

In re Bevan (Bevan v. Socal Communications Sites, LLC)
· 2003-05-01
Appeal (appellants (debtors L. Darrell and Patricia F. Bevan)) Granted

“The district court held that Socal became equitably subrogated to the IRS’s claim when it eliminated the Internal Revenue Service’s right of redemption in certain property that once belonged to the Bevans, but had been foreclosed upon by Socal. We disagree and reverse.”

Lansdale v. Hi-Health Supermart Corp.
· 2002-12-19
Appeal (appellant (plaintiff Jill Lansdale)) Denied

“Congress does have the authority to prescribe, and limit, remedies.”

Put Judge Fernandez's record to work

Ezel drafts and answers grounded in this exact profile: how Judge Fernandez actually rules, not a generic AI guess.

Opens in Ezel Pro. Every answer is grounded in Judge Fernandez's own signed orders and cites them.