Cynthia Holcomb Hall

How Judge Hall rules, drawn from 25 signed orders. Every observation links to the order it came from.

Judge Hall no longer hears cases. This profile is preserved as a historical record of how they ruled here.

Court
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Position
Circuit judge
Status
Deceased
Served
1984–2011
Appointed by
Ronald Reagan (Republican)
Commissioned
October 4, 1984
Education
Stanford University, A.B., 1951; Stanford Law School, LL.B., 1954; New York University School of Law, LL.M., 1960
Signed orders read
25

About Judge Hall

Cynthia Holcomb Hall was a judge of the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit. Appointed by President Ronald Reagan, Judge Hall received a commission on October 4, 1984. Judge Hall previously served on the United States District Court for the Central District of California, commissioned there on November 18, 1981. Judge Hall assumed senior status on August 31, 1997 and served until death on February 26, 2011.

How Judge Hall decides

Patterns drawn from this judge's own signed orders. Every observation links to the order it came from.

What persuades

Requires concrete evidence of arbitrariness or a defective legislative process before treating a public-employment classification change as a due-process violation.

“Plaintiff has produced no evidence that this process was defective, or that the legislation was arbitrary.”

Treats explicit credibility findings as essential to efficient and reviewable asylum adjudication.

“If immigration judges and the Board evaluate credibility in each case, remand will not be necessary”

Procedural preferences

Requires immigration appeal forms to give a meaningful statement of the claimed error, while also insisting that the dismissal system provide fair notice.

“Petition for review of the decision to dismiss GRANTED.”

Cautions

Enforces maritime-insurance disclosure duties without creating a good-faith exception not supplied by statute.

“we are not free to create a different rule.”

Signed rulings

A grounded sample of orders signed by this judge, with the verbatim dispositive language.

Juan Carlos Reyes-Mendoza v. Immigration and Naturalization Service
· 1985-12-23
Petition for review (immigration-petitioner) Denied

“AFFIRMED.”

Hernan Canjura-Flores v. Immigration and Naturalization Service
· 1986-03-11
Petition for review (asylum-petitioner) Granted

“REVERSED IN PART, REVERSED AND REMANDED IN PART.”

Rosendo Chavez-Ramirez and Zenaida Calderon De Chavez v. Immigration and Naturalization Service
· 1986-06-24
Petition for review (immigration-petitioners) Denied

“PETITION DENIED.”

Luis Mariano Platero-Reymundo v. Immigration and Naturalization Service
· 1987-01-09
Petition for review (immigration-petitioner) Denied

“The order of the BIA is AFFIRMED and the petition is DENIED.”

United States v. Sharon Cook
· 1988-10-18
Appeal (criminal-defendant-appellant) Denied

“AFFIRMED.”

United States v. Roman Magana-Olvera
· 1990-10-23
Appeal (criminal-defendant-appellant) Granted in part

“the judgment of the district court is AFFIRMED in part, REVERSED in part, and REMANDED.”

New El Rey Sausage Company, Inc. v. U.S. Immigration and Naturalization Service
· 1991-02-07
Petition for review (employer-petitioner) Denied

“AFFIRMED.”

United States v. Felipe Beltran-Felix
· 1991-05-28
Appeal (criminal-defendant-appellant) Denied

“The district court’s order is Affirmed.”

Marcelino Toquero v. Immigration and Naturalization Service
· 1992-01-31
Petition for review (immigration-petitioner) Denied

“AFFIRMED.”

United States v. Vanessa Renai Fletcher
· 1992-06-04
Appeal (criminal-defendant-appellant) Denied

“the judgment is AFFIRMED.”

United States v. Karil Mukai
· 1994-06-08
Appeal (United States-appellant) Granted

“REVERSED AND REMANDED.”

Pacific Telesis Group v. United States
· 1994-12-30
Appeal (telecommunications-company-appellant) Granted

“The district court’s order denying preliminary injunctive relief is therefore REVERSED and the case is REMANDED”

A historical record

Judge Hall no longer hears cases. This profile stays available as a record of how they ruled here. If you're preparing for a matter, start from the court's current bench.