Bridget Shelton Bade

“Regardless of whether California authorizes its courts to award equitable restitution under the UCL and CLRA when a plain, adequate, and complete remedy exists at law, we hold that federal courts rely on federal equitable principles before allowing equitable restitution in such circumstances. And because Sonner fails to demonstrate that she lacks an adequate legal remedy in this case, we affirm the district court's order dismissing her claims for restitution. AFFIRMED.”

“Here, we address content-based restrictions on speech and hold that AB 1687 is facially unconstitutional because it does not survive First Amendment scrutiny. We affirm the district court's grant of summary judgment. AFFIRMED.”

“We AFFIRM the district court's denial of Balbuena's petition for a writ of habeas corpus.”

“This appeal requires us to decide whether Section 502(a)(3) of the Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974 (ERISA), 29 U.S.C. Section 1132(a)(3), authorizes an award of attorney's fees incurred during the administrative phase of the ERISA claims process. We hold that Section 1132(a)(3) does not authorize an award of such fees and therefore affirm the judgment of the district court.”

“Because the State 'remained willing to meet with the tribe for further discussions' and 'actively negotiated,' the district court properly granted the State's motion, denied Pauma's motion, and entered judgment for the State. AFFIRMED.”

“Conviction AFFIRMED; Sentence VACATED and REMANDED for resentencing.”

“We AFFIRM the district court's denial of Dickinson's petition for a writ of habeas corpus.”

“AFFIRMED.”

“We AFFIRM the district court's order certifying the class, approving the settlement agreement, and awarding attorneys' fees.”

“The district court did not err by entering summary judgment for Defendants. And the district court did not abuse its discretion by denying Plaintiffs' motion for an extension of time. AFFIRMED.”

“We therefore reverse the district court's judgment in favor of the defendants on the United States' claims under Section 6324(a)(2), and remand to the district court with instructions to enter judgment in favor of the government on these claims with any further proceedings necessary to determine the amount of each defendant's liability for the unpaid taxes. REVERSED and REMANDED.”

“Accordingly, we affirm the judgments from the district court dismissing Pinson's and Sands's habeas petitions for lack of jurisdiction. AFFIRMED.”