Thomas Lee Kirsch II

U.S. Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit circuit Appointed by Donald Trump (Republican) 28 signed orders read

Signed rulings

A grounded sample of orders signed by this judge, with the verbatim dispositive language.

Brian Hope v. Commissioner of Indiana Department of Correction
22-2150 · 2023-04-27
Appeal (appellant (defendants -- Commissioner, Indiana DOC)) Granted

“On remand, the district court concluded that requiring the registration of pre-SORA sex offenders who have a registration obligation in another jurisdiction is not rationally related to a legitimate state interest and granted summary judgment to plaintiffs. We disagree and now reverse.”

People of the State of Illinois ex rel. Kwame Raoul v. 3M Company
23-3031 · 2024-08-07
Appeal (appellant (defendant 3M Company)) Denied

“Thus, 3M's attempt to remove the case under the federal officer removal statute fails under the fourth element. AFFIRMED”

LuzMaria Arroyo v. Volvo Group North America, LLC
23-1165 · 2024-02-27
Appeal (appellant (plaintiff LuzMaria Arroyo)) Denied

“Because Arroyo is not a qualified individual under the ADA, and because the district court did not abuse its discretion in finding that the jury verdict of the first trial resulted from passion and prejudice, we affirm.”

Demona Freeman v. Ocwen Loan Servicing, LLC
23-2512 · 2024-07-12
Appeal (appellant (plaintiff Demona Freeman)) Denied

“Because Freeman failed to state an FCRA claim and lacks standing to bring an FDCPA claim, we affirm.”

United States v. Luis Arroyo
22-2008 · 2023-07-28
Appeal (appellant (defendant Luis Arroyo)) Denied

“These arguments lack merit, too, so we affirm.”

Jeffery Lane v. Structural Iron Workers Local No. 1 Pension Trust Fund
22-1149 · 2023-07-17
Appeal (appellant (plaintiff Jeffery Lane)) Denied

“Because the Fund's decision was not downright unreasonable, we agree with the district court and affirm.”

Next Millennium Telecom Co. v. American Signal Corporation
23-2446 · 2024-08-12
Appeal (appellant (plaintiff Next Millennium Telecom Co.)) Denied

“Given "the procedural history of the case and the situation at the time of the dismissal," the court did not abuse its discretion and we affirm: there is an adequate record of Nextel's dilatory and insubordinate conduct such that we cannot conclude that "no reasonable person could concur" with the court's dismissal.”

United States v. Lynard Joiner
20-2361 · 2021-02-23
Appeal (appellant (defendant Lynard Joiner)) Denied

“Without any factual basis tying these broader societal concerns to Joiner's individual situation, the district court was not required to address the argument. Thus, because the district court did not procedurally err, we affirm.”

United States v. Sultan Issa
20-2949 · 2021-12-27
Appeal (appellant (defendant Sultan Issa)) Denied

“Issa has not shown the district court relied on inaccurate information at sentencing. ... Issa has waived any challenge to the district court's application of the enhancement. AFFIRMED”

Mark Anderson v. Deanna Brookhart
20-3330 · 2021-12-02
Petition for review (petitioner-appellant (state prisoner Mark Anderson)) Denied

“Because the Illinois Appellate Court reasonably applied Jackson v. Virginia, 443 U.S. 307 (1979), in upholding Anderson's conviction, we affirm the denial of habeas relief.”

United States v. Raul Ambriz-Villa, Jr.
21-1362 · 2022-03-14
Appeal (appellant (defendant Raul Ambriz-Villa, Jr.)) Denied

“The stop was not unlawful, and Ambriz-Villa voluntarily consented to the search, which was not tainted by the stop. ... Finding no error, we affirm.”

United States v. David Newton
21-2514 · 2022-06-15
Appeal (appellant (defendant David Newton)) Denied

“not once has he explained to us how he would satisfy the Broadfield-Ugbah safety valve, so we affirm the district court's finding that Newton did not present an extraordinary and compelling reason for early release.”

Put Judge Kirsch's record to work

Ezel drafts and answers grounded in this exact profile: how Judge Kirsch actually rules, not a generic AI guess.

Opens in Ezel Pro. Every answer is grounded in Judge Kirsch's own signed orders and cites them.