Rebecca Liane Taibleson

How Judge Taibleson rules, drawn from 13 signed orders. Every observation links to the order it came from.

Court
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit
Position
Circuit judge
Appointed by
Donald J. Trump (Republican)
Commissioned
November 3, 2025
Education
Yale University, B.A., 2005; Yale Law School, J.D., 2010
Signed orders read
13

About Judge Taibleson

Rebecca Liane Taibleson is a judge of the United States Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit. Appointed by President Donald J. Trump, Judge Taibleson received a commission on November 3, 2025.

Judge Taibleson's practices and standing orders

The court's website lists no individual practices or standing orders of Judge Taibleson's own (checked October 11, 2026), so the court's local rules and general orders are the place to look (court page ↗).

Standing orders for every case in this court

Orders the court applies to all of its cases, whichever judge has them, as published on the court's website (checked October 11, 2026).

The court's local rules ↗

How Judge Taibleson decides

Patterns drawn from this judge's own signed orders. Every observation links to the order it came from.

Procedural preferences

In Ballard, Taibleson declined to depart from circuit precedent on what qualifies as an ADA charge because the appellant gave no compelling reason to overturn it; the panel remanded the separate equitable tolling question.

“Ballard points to no compelling reason here, nor have we found one.”

In her separate Stapleton concurrence, she argued that an unpreserved sentencing objection should receive plain-error review under Rules 51(b) and 52(b). The panel did not decide that issue.

“If they fail to do so, plain-error review applies.”

Cautions

In a dissent, she treated an employer’s claimed undue hardship from a religious accommodation as an evidentiary defense that must be proved before summary judgment. This was her separate view, not the panel holding.

“as a defense to be proven, not an excuse to be presumed, even in a pandemic.”

Signed rulings

A grounded sample of orders signed by this judge, with the verbatim dispositive language.

United States v. Sean Grusd
No. 24-3120 · 2026-01-14
Appeal (criminal defendant/appellant) Denied

“AFFIRMED.”

Elizabeth Chitwood v. Ascension Health Alliance
No. 25-1933 · 2026-03-03
Appeal (employee/appellant) Denied

“AFFIRMED”

Jane Doe 1 v. Steven Sloan
Nos. 25-1917, 25-1918 & 25-1919 · 2026-04-14
Appeal (plaintiffs/appellants) Denied

“We affirm the judgment below.”

Kimberly Ballard v. Ameren Illinois Company
No. 25-1562 · 2026-04-28
Appeal (employee/appellant) Granted

“We vacate and remand.”

City of Chicago v. BP P.L.C.
25-1916 · 2026-07-15
Appeal (appellant) Denied

“The district court’s judgment is AFFIRMED.”

Dupont Water Company, Inc. v. City of Madison, Indiana
25-3131 · 2026-08-05
Appeal (appellant) Denied

“The district court’s judgment is AFFIRMED.”

Consolidated Chassis Management LLC v. Northland Insurance Company
25-1067, 25-1134, 25-1285 & 25-1336 · 2026-08-05
Appeal (appellant) Granted in part

“The district court’s judgment is REVERSED in part and AFFIRMED in part.”

United States v. Lloyd
25-1967 · 2026-08-12
Appeal (appellant) Granted

“Lloyd’s sentence is VACATED and his case is REMANDED for resentencing consistent with this opinion.”

Fields v. United States
24-2913 · 2026-08-17
Habeas petition (petitioner) Denied

“The district court’s judgment is accordingly AFFIRMED.”

Stupak v. Mont du Lac Snowsports, LLC
25-2143 · 2026-09-08
Appeal (appellant) Granted

“We VACATE the district court’s grant of summary judg- ment and REMAND for further proceedings consistent with this opinion.”

Hamada v. Laborforce, LLC
25-3110 · 2026-09-18
Appeal (appellant) Denied

“Because the Director failed to establish irreparable harm, the district court did not abuse its discretion in refusing to grant a § 10(j) injunction. The judgment is accordingly AFFIRMED.”

Mason v. Cook County, Illinois
25-2743 · 2026-09-28

Taibleson dissented from the panel’s affirmance of summary judgment for the county. She would have let a jury decide whether denying the pharmacist’s requested religious accommodation imposed an undue hardship under Title VII.

Caseload & timing

From public federal docket records for this judge.

Circuit judges do not carry a single assigned trial caseload.

Draft for Judge Taibleson with the record in hand

Ezel grounds your drafting and research in this profile: what has persuaded Judge Taibleson, and what has not, cited to the signed orders.

Opens in Ezel Pro.

  • Grounded in Judge Taibleson's own signed orders
  • Cites every source it relies on, so you can verify it
  • Chat, drafting and research in one workspace