Latham Castle

How Judge Castle rules, drawn from 25 signed orders. Every observation links to the order it came from.

Judge Castle no longer hears cases. This profile is preserved as a historical record of how they ruled here.

Court
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit
Position
Circuit judge
Status
Deceased
Served
1959–1986
Appointed by
Dwight D. Eisenhower (Republican)
Commissioned
April 30, 1959
Education
Northwestern University School of Law, LL.B., 1924
Signed orders read
25

About Judge Castle

Latham Castle was a judge of the United States Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit. Appointed by President Dwight D. Eisenhower, Judge Castle received a commission on April 30, 1959. Judge Castle assumed senior status on February 28, 1970 and served until death on March 10, 1986.

How Judge Castle decides

Patterns drawn from this judge's own signed orders. Every observation links to the order it came from.

Procedural preferences

Castle treated timely core arguments as sufficient and would not penalize a party for filing supplemental material with the agency's permission.

“Any other result would penalize Panduit for having received Board permission to file supplemental arguments in support of its timely request for rehearing.”

He affirmed summary judgment when every available account of an unwitnessed accident would depend on unsupported inference.

“no jury would have been justified in inferring that the accident happened in a particular manner.”

Cautions

He treated improperly admitted hearsay as harmless only after weighing the strength of the independent evidence.

“One of the main considerations in deciding if substantial prejudice exists because of the introduction of hearsay material is the strength of the Government’s case independent of the hearsay.”

Signed rulings

A grounded sample of orders signed by this judge, with the verbatim dispositive language.

Georgia Blockman and Leadership Council for Metropolitan Open Communities v. Sandalwood Apartments
79-1778 · 1980-01-10
Appeal (housing defendants/appellants) Granted in part

“We affirm the decision in favor of Blockman and reverse the entry of judgment in favor of the Leadership Council.”

Central Illinois Public Service Company v. United States Environmental Protection Agency
78-1775 · 1979-03-23
Appeal (electric utility/petitioner) Granted

“Reversed and Remanded.”

Panduit Corporation v. Dennison Manufacturing Company
77-1688 · 1979-03-12
Appeal (patent applicant/appellant) Granted

“REVERSED and REMANDED.”

David L. Heilman and E-C Tape Service, Inc. v. Griffin B. Bell, Attorney General
77-1968 · 1978-09-06
Appeal (tape duplicators/appellants) Denied

“AFFIRMED.”

National Labor Relations Board v. Hi-Temp, Inc.
73-2022 to 73-2024 · 1974-10-10
Appeal (labor board/petitioner) Granted

“The petition for enforcement is granted.”

Melvin C. Holt v. United States
17602 · 1970-01-23
Appeal (post-conviction petitioner/appellant) Denied

“the judgment below is affirmed.”

Louis Schick v. National Labor Relations Board
16799 · 1969-04-03
Appeal (employees/petitioners) Denied

“Affirmed.”

Indiana Lumbermens Mutual Insurance Company v. Bonnie Mitchell
17108 to 17110 · 1969-03-20
Appeal (insureds and competing insurer/appellants) Denied

“Affirmed.”

Cunningham Brothers, Inc. v. Harry Bail
17113 · 1969-03-10
Appeal (indemnity claimant/appellant) Denied

“the judgment below is affirmed.”

Anthony J. Scherer, Jr. v. Kenneth Morrow
16661 · 1969-02-24
Appeal (slander plaintiff/appellant) Denied

“The judgment below is therefore affirmed.”

Calcasieu Chemical Corporation v. Canal Barge Company
16899 · 1969-01-03
Appeal (cargo interests/appellants) Denied

“The judgment below is, therefore, affirmed.”

Robert Van Ermen v. John C. Burke
16559 · 1968-12-16
Appeal (habeas petitioner/appellant) Denied

“The judgment order of the District Court is affirmed.”

Caseload & timing

From public federal docket records for this judge.

Circuit judges do not carry a single assigned trial caseload.

A historical record

Judge Castle no longer hears cases. This profile stays available as a record of how they ruled here. If you're preparing for a matter, start from the court's current bench.