Kenneth Francis Ripple
How Judge Ripple rules, drawn from 35 signed orders. Every observation links to the order it came from.
About Judge Ripple
Kenneth Francis Ripple is a judge of the United States Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit. Appointed by President Ronald Reagan, Judge Ripple received a commission on May 10, 1985. Judge Ripple assumed senior status on September 1, 2008.
Judge Ripple's practices and standing orders
The court's website lists no individual practices or standing orders of Judge Ripple's own (checked October 11, 2026), so the court's local rules and general orders are the place to look (court page ↗).
Standing orders for every case in this court
Orders the court applies to all of its cases, whichever judge has them, as published on the court's website (checked October 11, 2026).
How Judge Ripple decides
Patterns drawn from this judge's own signed orders. Every observation links to the order it came from.
What persuades
In an ineffective-assistance appeal, Ripple resolved the claim on Strickland's prejudice prong without deciding whether counsel performed deficiently. The omitted witness testimony did not create a reasonable probability of a different result, so the habeas petitioner could not obtain relief.
“the prudent course is to pretermit any discussion of the performance prong of the Strickland analysis and to decide this case on the prejudice prong.”
In an armed-career-criminal appeal, Ripple applied an intervening Supreme Court decision requiring a jury to decide whether prior offenses occurred on different occasions. He also examined harmlessness independently and vacated the sentence because a properly instructed jury could have reached a different conclusion.
“Given the advent of Erlinger, we now know that the district court erred in declining to send the different-occasions question to a jury. This error, moreover, was not a harmless one.”
In a contract dispute, Ripple enforced the agreement's named appraisal methods instead of substituting lists maintained by successor banks. The contract already supplied an alternative selection method, so its literal terms were workable rather than absurd.
“The plain language of the contract does not produce results so absurd as to warrant adding in language that the drafters quite rationally omitted.”
Procedural preferences
In a felon-in-possession appeal, Ripple tested a proposed affirmative defense against the defendant's own factual proffer before deciding whether the circuit should recognize the defense. Because the proffer did not show prompt, reasonable steps to surrender the firearm, the defense could not reach the jury.
“Even if we were to recognize a broader innocent possession defense, Mr. Sorensen’s proffered facts would not entitle him to present such a defense in this case.”
Cautions
In Bell v. Hepp, Ripple acknowledged that the prosecutor’s comments could give the court pause on de novo review but denied habeas relief because the Wisconsin Supreme Court’s ruling survived AEDPA’s deferential standard.
“If our review were de novo, the prosecutor’s comments might give us significant pause. But in this habeas corpus case, the Antiterrorism and Effective Death Penalty Act (‘AEDPA’) limits our review.”
Signed rulings
A grounded sample of orders signed by this judge, with the verbatim dispositive language.
“Accordingly, the judgment of the district court is affirmed.”
“We decline to recognize an innocent possession defense to 18 U.S.C. § 922(g)(1) in this case. We therefore affirm the judgment of the district court.”
“The district court did not abuse its discretion in denying the motion of counsel to withdraw. Mr. Smith's sentence is not unreasonable. We affirm the judgment of the district court.”
“Given the advent of Erlinger, we now know that the district court erred in declining to send the different-occasions question to a jury. This error, moreover, was not a harmless one. Accordingly, we vacate the judgment of the district court and remand the case for further proceedings consistent with this opinion.”
“Based on the record before it, the district court did not err in awarding costs to Wexford and Dr. Siddiqui. We therefore affirm the assessment of costs against Mr. Ebrahimi.”
“Because the terms of the contract did not permit a unilateral selection of an appraiser from the lists of the successor banks, and because Full Circle did not seek the approval of the Investor Limited Partner, Full Circle did not comply with the terms of the option and a contract was never formed. The district court therefore properly granted the motion for summary judgment.”
“For the foregoing reasons, the district court’s decision is affirmed.”
“In obtaining Mr. Rosario's cell-site location information, the officers relied in good faith on the procedures set forth in the Stored Communications Act. Moreover, the officers inevitably would have discovered Mr. Rosario's cell-site location information. The district court correctly ruled in denying Mr. Rosario's motion to suppress and his motion for a new trial. The judgment of the district court is affirmed.”
“Even taking all reasonable inferences in her favor, the record cannot support her contention that the Board discriminated or retaliated against her. We therefore affirm the district court's grant of summary judgment to the Board.”
“An objectively reasonable officer, having consulted with the State's Attorney in the preparation of the complaint and affidavit accompanying the application for the warrant, could have relied in good faith on the search warrant that he obtained from a judge. The warrant here, although incomplete, was not so utterly lacking in indicia of probable cause that suppression is justified.”
“The district court correctly determined that Ms. Anderson has failed to raise a genuine issue of fact that her termination constituted an interference with her FMLA leave.”
“For the reasons set forth in this opinion, we affirm the judgment of the district court.”
Draft for Judge Ripple with the record in hand
Ezel grounds your drafting and research in this profile: what has persuaded Judge Ripple, and what has not, cited to the signed orders.
Opens in Ezel Pro.
- Grounded in Judge Ripple's own signed orders
- Cites every source it relies on, so you can verify it
- Chat, drafting and research in one workspace