James Earl Major

How Judge Major rules, drawn from 25 signed orders. Every observation links to the order it came from.

Judge Major no longer hears cases. This profile is preserved as a historical record of how they ruled.

Court
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit
Position
circuit
Status
Retired 1972
Served
1937–1972
Appointed by
Franklin D. Roosevelt (Democratic)
Commissioned
1937-03-23
Education
Illinois College of Law; Read law, 1910
Signed orders read
25

How Judge Major decides

Patterns drawn from this judge's own signed orders. Every observation links to the order it came from.

Procedural preferences

Major approved ending litigation when a party had long known the facts but failed to state a viable claim before trial.

“All litigation must sometime be brought to an end and, in our view, under the circumstances, there was no abuse of discretion on the part of the trial court in the rulings complained of.”

Major directed a judgment of acquittal when the indictment alleged that a kidnapping victim was held for reward but the government presented no proof of that allegation.

“This holding, however, is of little comfort to the government because admittedly there was no proof in support of the allegation that the baby was held for reward.”

Where disputed injunction provisions could simply be deleted with the parties' assent, Major ordered that limited modification without deciding their validity.

“Under such circumstances, we discern no reason why we should rule on the issue as to their validity when all question can be removed by their elimination.”

Cautions

A default judgment could not stand when service on the corporation failed to satisfy the legal requirements.

“The liberal construction rule which the government seeks to invoke cannot be utilized as a substitute for the plain legal requirement as to the manner in which service of process may be had.”

Reviewing an agency's discriminatory-discharge finding, Major cautioned that contrary inference ordinarily could not overcome direct positive testimony.

“It has been held, and we think properly, that inferences contrary to direct testimony are not ordinarily sufficient to support a finding.”

Signed rulings

A grounded sample of orders signed by this judge, with the verbatim dispositive language.

The v. L. Smithers Manufacturing Company v. William P. O'Brien and William J. O'malley, D.B.A. Illinois Wholesale Florist
340 F.2d 952 (7th Cir. 1965) · 1965-02-16
Appeal (patent owner/appellant) Denied

“Affirmed.”

Donald F. Duncan, Inc. v. Royal Tops Manufacturing Co.
343 F.2d 669 (7th Cir. 1965) · 1965-03-03
Appeal (plaintiff/appellant) Denied

“The judgment appealed from is Affirmed.”

Guglielmo Monte v. Immigration & Naturalization Service
353 F.2d 7 (7th Cir. 1965) · 1965-10-25
Appeal (alien/petitioner) Denied

“Affirmed.”

Ismat Tawfeek Khalaf v. Immigration and Naturalization Service
361 F.2d 208 (7th Cir. 1966) · 1966-05-19
Appeal (alien/petitioner) Moot / procedural

“The petition for review of the denial of petitioner’s request for voluntary departure is dismissed.”

William Rabiolo v. Myron Weinstein, Richard Jordan, Ronald Pontius and Bernard Smith
357 F.2d 167 (7th Cir. 1966) · 1966-02-23
Appeal (plaintiff/appellant) Denied

“Affirmed.”

Nikolaos Kusularis v. Immigration and Naturalization Service
361 F.2d 311 (7th Cir. 1966) · 1966-05-19
Appeal (alien/petitioner) Moot / procedural

“His petition for review is dismissed.”

United States v. Superintendent, Downey Veterans Administration Hospital, North Chicago, Illinois
354 F.2d 635 (7th Cir. 1965) · 1965-12-29
Appeal (habeas petitioner/appellant) Denied

“Affirmed.”

United States of America Ex Rel. Mac Tanner v. Frank J. Pate, Warden, Illinois State Penitentiary, Joliet, Illinois
329 F.2d 170 (7th Cir. 1964) · 1964-05-18
Appeal (habeas petitioner/appellant) Denied

“Affirmed,”

Lucian L. Barrett v. Toledo, Peoria & Western Railroad Company, a Corporation
334 F.2d 803 (7th Cir. 1964) · 1964-06-30
Appeal (railroad/appellant) Denied

“the judgment must be affirmed.”

American Bridge Division, United States Steel Corporation v. Roen Steamship Company
328 F.2d 838 (7th Cir. 1964) · 1964-03-09
Appeal (shipowner/appellant) Denied

“Affirmed.”

John F. Waldon v. United States
362 F.2d 155 (7th Cir. 1966) · 1966-06-07
Appeal (prisoner/appellant) Denied

“Affirmed.”

Beckman Instruments, Inc. And Harold A. Frediani v. Coleman Instruments, Inc.
338 F.2d 573 (7th Cir. 1964) · 1964-11-09
Appeal (patent owner/appellant) Denied

“Affirmed.”

Caseload & timing

From public federal docket records for this judge.

Circuit judges do not carry a single assigned trial caseload.

A historical record

Judge Major no longer hears cases. This profile stays available as a record of how they ruled. If you're preparing for a matter, start from the court's current bench.