Hardress Nathan Swaim

How Judge Swaim rules, drawn from 25 signed orders. Every observation links to the order it came from.

Judge Swaim no longer hears cases. This profile is preserved as a historical record of how they ruled.

Court
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit
Position
circuit
Status
Retired 1957
Served
1950–1957
Appointed by
Harry S. Truman (Democratic)
Commissioned
1950-02-10
Education
DePauw University, A.B., 1913; University of Chicago Law School, J.D., 1916
Signed orders read
25

How Judge Swaim decides

Patterns drawn from this judge's own signed orders. Every observation links to the order it came from.

Procedural preferences

Swaim treated a warrant that exceeded the probable-cause showing as invalid from the outset and required suppression of the resulting evidence.

“All we need know is that the warrant was not valid when issued. As a result the search was illegal.”

He required bankruptcy factfinders to make findings sufficient to reveal the factual basis for their legal conclusions.

“there must be findings * * which are sufficient to indicate the factual basis for the ultimate conclusion.”

After plaintiffs voluntarily dismissed their suit, Swaim remanded so the district court could exercise its discretion over whether to retain jurisdiction of the counterclaim.

“defendant is entitled to have the District Court exercise its judicial discretion in determining whether the court shall assume jurisdiction of the counterclaim”

Swaim treated an unappealed dismissal of an earlier complaint raising the same issues between the same parties as conclusive against the later complaint.

“Courts are not required to repeatedly determine the same questions and the same issues between the same parties.”

Cautions

He would not uphold a draft-board decision that rested on a legal misconception rather than evidence.

“There was no basis in fact or in law for such a finding.”

In a civil-rights complaint challenging a withheld letter, Swaim required facts showing how the withholding affected the prisoner's appeal rather than a conclusory allegation.

“his complaint should set forth facts establishing what that effect is instead of merely stating his conclusions as to it.”

Swaim required an unavailable declarant's affidavit to be trustworthy even if its statements were against the declarant's pecuniary interest.

“If the statements in the affidavit were against his pecuniary interest they fell far short of having been ‘made under circumstances regarded as rendering [them] trustworthy,’ one of the requirements which the petitioner admits was necessary to make the affidavit admissible.”

Signed rulings

A grounded sample of orders signed by this judge, with the verbatim dispositive language.

Federal Trade Commission v. William T. Reed, President, Reed Candy Company
243 F.2d 308 (7th Cir. 1957) · 1957-05-20
Appeal (company president/appellant) Denied

“Affirmed.”

In the Matter of Robert L. Knetzer, Bankrupt. Robert W. Jaffke v. William C. Dunham, as Trustee of the Estate of Robert L. Knetzer, Bankrupt
243 F.2d 460 (7th Cir. 1957) · 1957-05-02
Appeal (bankruptcy claimant/appellant) Granted

“Reversed.”

In re Woodmar Realty Co.
241 F.2d 768 (7th Cir. 1957) · 1957-04-02
Appeal (debtor and stockholders/appellants) Granted in part

“Affirmed in part, reversed in part and remanded.”

Morris Rosenthal and Rose Rosenthal v. Gordon M. Hildebrand, Louis Rosenthal, K. Lewis Gilbert, Nannie H. Hildebrand and Alton Parker Hildebrand
242 F.2d 607 (7th Cir. 1957) · 1957-03-25
Appeal (plaintiffs/appellants) Denied

“The judgment of dismissal is affirmed.”

William B. F. Hall, Aileen Hall Shoaff, Arthur F. Hall, Jr., Alva J. McAndless and Fred B. Shoaff, II v. United States
242 F.2d 412 (7th Cir. 1957) · 1957-03-25
Appeal (taxpayers/appellants) Denied

“The judgment of the District Court is affirmed.”

J. R. Adney v. Mississippi Lime Company of Missouri
241 F.2d 43 (7th Cir. 1957) · 1957-02-08
Appeal (landowners/appellants) Granted

“The order of dismissal is reversed and the cause remanded for further proceedings consistent with this opinion.”

William Banks v. United States
239 F.2d 409 (7th Cir. 1957) · 1957-01-29
Appeal (post-conviction petitioner/appellant) Denied

“The order of the District Court is affirmed.”

United States v. Fred Harper
241 F.2d 103 (7th Cir. 1957) · 1957-01-23
Appeal (post-conviction petitioner/appellant) Denied

“The order is affirmed.”

Lamar H. Miller v. New York Central Railroad Company
239 F.2d 10 (7th Cir. 1956) · 1956-12-12
Appeal (railroad employee/appellant) Denied

“Affirmed.”

United States v. Joseph Jakalski
237 F.2d 503 (7th Cir. 1956) · 1956-11-07
Appeal (post-conviction petitioner/appellant) Denied

“The order of the District Court is affirmed.”

United States v. Carolina Casualty Insurance Company
237 F.2d 451 (7th Cir. 1956) · 1956-10-11
Appeal (bond surety/appellant) Denied

“The order of forfeiture and judgment thereon is affirmed.”

Frances Magnus, Administrator of the Estate of Leo Michalowski, Deceased v. United States
234 F.2d 673 (7th Cir. 1956) · 1956-08-08
Appeal (veteran's estate/appellant) Denied

“The judgment of the District Court dismissing this action is Affirmed.”

Caseload & timing

From public federal docket records for this judge.

Circuit judges do not carry a single assigned trial caseload.

A historical record

Judge Swaim no longer hears cases. This profile stays available as a record of how they ruled. If you're preparing for a matter, start from the court's current bench.