George True Page

U.S. Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit circuit Retired 1941 · served 1919–1941 Appointed by Woodrow Wilson (Democratic) 25 signed orders read

Judge Page no longer hears cases. This profile is preserved as a historical record of how they ruled.

How Judge Page decides

Patterns drawn from this judge's own signed orders. Every observation links to the order it came from.

Procedural preferences

After a jury waiver, Page required a party to request findings or rulings to preserve general questions for appellate review.

“the record presents here no question of law or fact for review, except as to certain rulings upon the evidence”

Page reviewed preliminary injunctions for abuse of discretion and considered parallel litigation, solvency, and practical timing.

“There was no abuse of discretion in deny ing the injunction.”

Cautions

Unnecessarily repetitive records and briefing could forfeit appellate costs even when the appellant obtained reversal.

“There are many other things in the record and the briefs that make them unjustifiably long.”

Signed rulings

A grounded sample of orders signed by this judge, with the verbatim dispositive language.

Gresham v. Leslie
50 F.2d 900 (7th Cir. 1931) · 1931-06-25
Appeal (plaintiff/appellant) Denied

“Affirmed.”

Lazzara v. Wisconsin Boxing Club
29 F.2d 483 (7th Cir. 1928) · 1928-12-04
Appeal (boxer/appellant) Denied

“the judgment affirmed.”

Ditto, Inc. v. Vivid, Inc.
32 F.2d 241 (7th Cir. 1929) · 1929-04-17
Appeal (patent owner/appellant) Denied

“Judgment affirmed.”

Graham v. United States
44 F.2d 566 (7th Cir. 1930) · 1930-11-11
Appeal (taxpayers/appellants) Denied

“The agreement did not constitute a partnership, and the judgments are affirmed.”

Collegiate World Publishing Co. v. Du Pont Publishing Co.
25 F.2d 1018 (7th Cir. 1928) · 1928-03-28
Appeal (publisher/appellant) Denied

“The decree of the District Court is affirmed.”

Farina Bus Line & Transportation Co. v. City of Hammond
11 F.2d 943 (7th Cir. 1926) · 1926-03-12
Appeal (bus operator/appellant) Granted

“The decree is reversed, with directions to the District Court to enter a decree granting the injunction.”

United States v. Fifteen Cases of Bred Spred, Raspberry Flavor
35 F.2d 183 (7th Cir. 1929) · 1929-10-25
Appeal (United States/appellant) Denied

“The judgment is affirmed.”

Eibel Process Co. v. Alexandria Paper Co.
19 F.2d 358 (7th Cir. 1927) · 1927-05-17
Appeal (patent owner/appellant) Granted

“The decree is reversed, with direction to enter a decree in harmony with this opinion and t.o make an accounting.”

Barger v. National Discount Corp.
33 F.2d 511 (7th Cir. 1929) · 1929-06-10
Appeal (trustee and secured creditor/cross-appellants) Denied

“The decree is affirmed.”

Hynes v. United States
35 F.2d 734 (7th Cir. 1929) · 1929-11-21
Appeal (prisoner/appellant) Denied

“Judgment is affirmed.”

Martin v. Chapman & Smith
38 F.2d 629 (7th Cir. 1930) · 1930-03-12
Appeal (bankrupt/appellant) Denied

“The order of the District Court should be, and it is, affirmed.”

Booth v. Stutz Motor Car Co.
24 F.2d 415 (7th Cir. 1928) · 1928-02-27
Appeal (designer/appellant) Granted

“The order of dismissal is reversed, and the cause remanded to the District Court, to proceed in harmony with this opinion.”

Caseload & timing

From public federal docket records for this judge.

Circuit judges do not carry a single assigned trial caseload.

A historical record

Judge Page no longer hears cases. This profile stays available as a record of how they ruled. If you're preparing for a matter, start from the court's current bench.