Daniel Anthony Manion

How Judge Manion rules, drawn from 28 signed orders. Every observation links to the order it came from.

Judge Manion no longer hears cases. This profile is preserved as a historical record of how they ruled here.

Court
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit
Position
Circuit judge
Status
Deceased
Served
1986–2024
Appointed by
Ronald Reagan (Republican)
Commissioned
July 24, 1986
ABA rating
Qualified/Unqualified (split)
Education
University of Notre Dame (A.B., 1964); Indiana University School of Law -- Indianapolis (now McKinney School of Law) (J.D., 1973)
Signed orders read
28

About Judge Manion

Daniel Anthony Manion was a judge of the United States Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit. Appointed by President Ronald Reagan, Judge Manion received a commission on July 24, 1986. Judge Manion assumed senior status on December 18, 2007 and served until death on August 31, 2024.

How Judge Manion decides

Patterns drawn from this judge's own signed orders. Every observation links to the order it came from.

What persuades

For a late administrative brief, credits a lawyer’s prompt action after the government delayed access to the file needed to prepare it.

“On these facts, any reasonable exercise of discretion re‐ quired acceptance of Oluwajana’s brief.”

Procedural preferences

Applies an insurance policy’s two-year limit on any legal action to a motion seeking to compel appraisal, even where the policyholder pursued appraisal within a pending suit.

“A motion to compel appraisal falls under this category.”

Cautions

For a firearm enhancement tied to drug trafficking, permits an inference from a gun available to protect a drug stash; evidence of brandishing or carrying it during a sale is unnecessary.

“a gun that is available to protect a drug stash has the potential of facilitating drug trafficking.”

Signed rulings

A grounded sample of orders signed by this judge, with the verbatim dispositive language.

United States v. Benjamin Kramer
20-3458 · 2022-02-07
Appeal (appellant (defendant Benjamin Barry Kramer)) Denied

“We disagree and affirm the district court's judgment.”

Olawole Oluwajana v. Merrick B. Garland
21-1804 · 2022-03-09
Petition for review (petitioner (Olawole Oluwajana)) Granted

“Accordingly, we GRANT the petition for review, VACATE the Board's order, and REMAND for further proceedings consistent with this opinion.”

Legend's Creek Homeowners Association, Inc. v. Travelers Indemnity Company of America
20-3163, 21-1288 & 21-2196 · 2022-05-10
Appeal (appellant (plaintiff Legend's Creek Homeowners Association)) Denied

“Having reviewed the briefs and relevant law, we see no reason to disagree with its judgment. AFFIRMED”

United States v. Michael Sarno
21-1963 · 2022-06-21
Appeal (appellant (defendant Michael Sarno)) Denied

“The district court did not abuse its discretion or otherwise err in denying Sarno early release. AFFIRMED”

Victor Gonzalez v. McHenry County, Illinois
21-2756 · 2022-07-26
Appeal (appellant (plaintiff Victor Gonzalez, estate administrator)) Denied

“Therefore, having reviewed the briefs and the relevant law, we AFFIRM.”

United States v. Trent Slone
20-2721 · 2021-03-10
Appeal (appellant (defendant Trent Slone)) Denied

“Because the district court did not clearly err in finding that there was a connection, and the court emphasized that it would impose the same sentence regardless of the guidelines range, we affirm.”

United States v. Jeremy Schenck
20-2353 · 2021-07-02
Appeal (appellant (defendant Jeremy Schenck)) Denied

“The district judge did not err in denying suppression. We affirm.”

United States v. Cliffton D. Batchelder
not stated in opinion text · 1987-06-15
Appeal (appellant (defendant Cliffton Batchelder)) Denied

“We agree that despite the age of the business records relied on, there was probable cause justifying the issuance of a warrant.”

United States v. Harold Wayne Piontek
not stated in opinion text · 1988-10-14
Appeal (appellant (defendant Harold Piontek)) Denied

“For the reasons discussed above, Piontek's conviction is AFFIRMED.”

United States v. Robert M. Warner
not stated in opinion text · 1988-08-10
Appeal (appellant (defendant Robert Warner)) Denied

“For the reasons stated above, the district court's judgment is Affirmed.”

Rush Presbyterian St. Luke's Medical Center v. Safeco Insurance Company of America
not stated in opinion text · 1987-08-05
Appeal (appellant (plaintiff Rush Presbyterian St. Luke's Medical Center)) Denied

“Judgment for Safeco is Affirmed.”

Sheila Mele v. Sherman Hospital
not stated in opinion text · 1988-01-25
Appeal (appellant (plaintiff Sheila Mele)) Denied

“Mele failed to prove two required elements of her case -- the level of the Hospital's standard of care and that it breached that standard of care. Therefore, the district court properly directed a verdict in the Hospital's favor.”

A historical record

Judge Manion no longer hears cases. This profile stays available as a record of how they ruled here. If you're preparing for a matter, start from the court's current bench.