Kurt Damian Engelhardt

U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit circuit Appointed by Donald Trump (Republican) 16 signed orders read

Signed rulings

A grounded sample of orders signed by this judge, with the verbatim dispositive language.

United States v. Dana Miller
17-10594 · 2018-10-18
Appeal (appellant) Denied

“the district court's application of the sophisticated means enhancement was not clearly erroneous. ... CONCLUSION AFFIRMED.”

United States v. James Ganzer, Jr.
17-51042 · 2019-04-24
Appeal (appellant) Denied

“Accordingly, we hold that the good-faith exception to the exclusionary rule is applicable to the NIT warrant and its fruits and, therefore, AFFIRM the district court's denial of Ganzer's motion to suppress.”

United States v. Felipe Vinagre-Hernandez
18-50402 · 2019-06-07
Appeal (appellant) Denied

“For the aforementioned reasons, this court AFFIRMS the decision of the district court.”

Armstrong v. Ashley
18-30296 · 2019-03-11
Appeal (appellant) Moot / procedural

“Because the district court's decision on the Rule 12(b)(6) motion was based on timing rather than a substantive legal disposition regarding qualified immunity, this court does not have jurisdiction to consider the appeal at this time. ... We DISMISS this appeal for lack of appellate jurisdiction.”

The Inclusive Communities Project, Inc. v. Lincoln Property Co.
17-10943 · 2019-04-09
Appeal (appellant) Denied

“we find no error in the district court's determination that the allegations of ICP's complaint regarding Lincoln's and the Owners' "no vouchers" policies fail to allege facts sufficient to provide the robust causation necessary for an actionable disparate impact claim.”

United States v. Jason Lee Randall
17-11403 · 2019-05-22
Appeal (appellant) Granted

“Finding plain error in the district court's offense level calculation, we VACATE Randall's sentence and REMAND for re-sentencing consistent with this opinion.”

United States v. Orbie Dale Chambliss
19-50741 · 2020-01-28
Appeal (appellant) Denied

“having reviewed the district court's clearly-articulated reasons for denying Chambliss' motion to reduce his sentence, we find no abuse of discretion... Accordingly, we AFFIRM.”

United States v. Rodney Andrew Johnson
18-50826 · 2019-11-22
Appeal (appellant) Denied

“Johnson has failed to show a reasonable probability that, but for the error, he would have received a lesser sentence... AFFIRMED.”

United States v. Rosalio Ramos Tapia
18-10161 · 2020-01-06
Appeal (appellant) Denied

“Tapia has not carried his burden of proving that he would have received a lesser sentence had the Government not referenced the proffer information; consequently, his substantial rights were not affected. AFFIRMED.”

United States v. Louis Luyten
19-40603 · 2020-07-15
Appeal (appellant) Denied

“the district court did not err in its imposition of the sentencing enhancement under U.S.S.G. 2L1.1(b)(6). Accordingly, the judgment of the district court is AFFIRMED.”

United States v. Elekwachi Kalu
18-20399 · 2019-08-30
Appeal (appellant) Denied

“it was not erroneous for the district court to conclude that the claim numbers qualified as 'means of identification,' and that Kalu's offense thus warranted the two-level enhancement... AFFIRMED.”

United States v. Efren Madrid, Jr.
19-50999 · 2020-10-15
Appeal (appellant) Denied

“The district court did not err in assessing a $5,000 monetary penalty under the AVAA, no discrepancy exists between the orally pronounced assessment and the written judgment, and the district court did not err by denying a downward variance... AFFIRMED.”

Caseload & timing

From public federal docket records for this judge.

The sampled dockets of Engelhardt's E.D. La. cases are dominated by miscellaneous proceedings (grand-jury, search-warrant, and administrative matters), reflecting what the record happens to hold rather than his true civil-criminal mix; do not read the sample as a caseload distribution.

Put Judge Engelhardt's record to work

Ezel drafts and answers grounded in this exact profile: how Judge Engelhardt actually rules, not a generic AI guess.

Opens in Ezel Pro. Every answer is grounded in Judge Engelhardt's own signed orders and cites them.