Irma Carrillo Ramirez
Signed rulings
A grounded sample of orders signed by this judge, with the verbatim dispositive language.
“The court accordingly enjoined both maps in their entirety. For the reasons that follow, we AFFIRM.”
““[W]e cannot find an effective denial of injunctive relief based on the district court’s failure to issue the requested ruling within 42 minutes.” Id. at 4 (Ramirez, J., concurring).”
Per curiam published order (Ho, Wilson, Ramirez) entered after the Supreme Court (A.A.R.P. v. Trump, 605 U.S. __ (2025)) vacated the Fifth Circuit's earlier jurisdictional dismissal and remanded with instructions to proceed 'expeditiously': 'Accordingly, this matter is expedited to the next available randomly designated regular oral argument panel.' It is purely procedural, deciding no motion on the merits. Ramirez joined the per curiam order.
“Our analysis leads us to GRANT a preliminary injunction to prevent removal because we find no invasion or predatory incursion, conclude on the current record that the updated notice satisfies due process, and REMAND for further proceedings. To be clear as to our ruling, two judges agree that the revised notice procedures satisfy due process at least based on the current record.”
“SpaceX appeals the “effective denial” of its motion for injunctive relief challenging the allegedly unconstitutional administrative proceeding before the National Labor Relations Board (“NLRB”). We DISMISS this appeal for lack of subject-matter jurisdiction.”
“Hung Huu Quoc Nguyen (Nguyen) challenges the United States Citizenship and Immigration Services’ (USCIS) revocation of its approval of his EB-3 visa petition. We AFFIRM the district court’s dismissal for lack of subject-matter jurisdiction.”
“In this insurance-coverage dispute, the parties disagree whether the policy covers business-interruption losses allegedly caused by COVID-19. The district court dismissed the complaint for failure to state a claim. We AFFIRM.”
“The surety, Lexon Insurance Company, Inc., sued the prior leaseholders for reimbursement, but the district court dismissed its claims. We AFFIRM the dismissal.”
“Because failure to attach the judgment was not a jurisdictional defect mandating dismissal, and the district court abused its discretion, we REVERSE and REMAND.”
“Christopher Dilworth appeals a summary judgment dismissing his false-arrest and excessive-force claims based on qualified immunity. We AFFIRM.”
“Appellants are a group of lawfully admitted Indian nationals who have applied for permanent residency... Because subject-matter jurisdiction is lacking, we must VACATE and REMAND with instructions to dismiss.”
“Their challenge to the constitutionality of that statute... was dismissed for lack of jurisdiction. We AFFIRM.”
Caseload & timing
From public federal docket records for this judge.
Circuit judges do not carry a trial caseload; not enumerated.
Put Judge Ramirez's record to work
Ezel drafts and answers grounded in this exact profile: how Judge Ramirez actually rules, not a generic AI guess.
Opens in Ezel Pro. Every answer is grounded in Judge Ramirez's own signed orders and cites them.