Elbert Parr Tuttle

U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit circuit Deceased · served 1954–1996 Appointed by Dwight D. Eisenhower (Republican) 25 signed orders read

Judge Tuttle no longer hears cases. This profile is preserved as a historical record of how they ruled.

How Judge Tuttle decides

Patterns drawn from this judge's own signed orders. Every observation links to the order it came from.

What persuades

Treats racial identification in jury-source lists combined with substantial disparity in the resulting venire as grounds for a new trial.

“We conclude, therefore, that the trial court did not err in granting the rule absolute and remanding the petitioner to the Superior Court of Fulton County for a new trial within a reasonable time, determined by the trial court to be a period of four months from a final decision in this case.”

Construes genuinely ambiguous insurance language in favor of the insured.

“That if the language of an insurance policy admits of more than one construction, that most favorable to the insured must be adopted”

Procedural preferences

Requires an evidentiary hearing on a collateral attack unless the existing motion, files, and record conclusively foreclose relief.

“Whether he entered the plea voluntarily through his counsel and whether he did so with an understanding of the nature of the offense under the particular circumstances here present are questions of fact which must be resolved by the trial court on a hearing.”

Does not permit dismissal of class allegations solely because the named representative loses his individual claim.

“In that case, this Court held that it is not proper for a trial court to dismiss a class action solely on the basis of a preliminary determination that the single named plaintiff purporting to represent the class is not entitled to relief on the merits of his individual claim.”

Cautions

Suspicion and association with wrongdoers do not substitute for evidence sufficient to submit a criminal conspiracy charge to the jury.

“Mere suspicion is, of course, not sufficient to warrant the submission of a criminal case to a jury.”

Declines to apply a new environmental-review requirement where a project was already overwhelmingly completed and committed before the statute took effect.

“It is simply unreasonable to assume that Congress intended that at this point in time, construction should halt, an environmental impact study should be made, and the highway possibly be rerouted.”

Signed rulings

A grounded sample of orders signed by this judge, with the verbatim dispositive language.

H. F. Sears and A. E. Herrmann Corporation v. Federal Power Commission
· 1959-02-20
Appeal (natural-gas producers petitioners) Granted in part

“The petition is granted to the extent that the Commission is directed to reopen these proceedings to afford petitioner reasonable opportunity to adduce such evidence as they may be advised is relevant to the inquiry whether the proposed rate is just and reasonable. In all other respects the petition is denied.”

Sun Oil Co. v. Federal Power Commission
· 1958-04-23
Appeal (natural-gas producers petitioners) Granted in part

“The petition is granted to the extent that the Commission is directed to reopen these proceedings to afford petitioners reasonable opportunity to adduce such evidence as they may be advised is relevant to the inquiry whether the proposed rate of 16 cents plus 1 cent state tax is just and reasonable. In all other respects the petition is Denied.”

Seaboard Air Line Railroad Company v. Sarasota-Fruitville Drainage District
· 1958-05-15
Appeal (railroad appellant) Denied

“The judgment is affirmed.”

Sing Wall v. United States of America, Lawrence Wall v. United States
· 1955-06-02
Appeal (criminal defendants appellants) Denied

“Affirmed.”

Russell Frownfelter v. International Shoe Co. And Sho-Enterprise Corp.
· 1960-01-07
Appeal (fraud plaintiff appellant) Denied

“Judgment affirmed.”

United States of America, Intervenor v. Seaboard MacHinery Corporation
· 1959-11-25
Appeal (United States intervenor appellant) Granted

“The judgment is reversed and the cause remanded for the entry of judgment in favor of the United States for the amount of insurance funds held in escrow.”

Gomez v. United States
· 1957-06-24
Appeal (criminal defendant appellant) Denied

“No error being shown, the judgment is affirmed.”

Kalil v. Commissioner
· 1959-11-10
Appeal (taxpayers petitioners) Denied

“Decision affirmed.”

Kahook v. Johnson
· 1960-01-11
Appeal (deportation respondent appellant) Denied

“The judgment is affirmed.”

Tompkins Motor Lines, Inc., and Ralph Rucelle Shelton v. Georgia Broilers, Inc.
· 1958-11-07
Appeal (motor carrier and driver appellants) Denied

“The judgment is affirmed.”

Fidelity and Casualty Company of New York v. Edith Joyce Murray Lott
· 1960-01-11
Appeal (insurer appellant) Denied

“Affirmed.”

Alfred J. Riedel and Louise Riedel v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue
· 1958-12-02
Appeal (taxpayers petitioners) Granted

“The judgment of the Tax Court is reversed and the case remanded for entry of judgment in favor of petitioners.”

A historical record

Judge Tuttle no longer hears cases. This profile stays available as a record of how they ruled. If you're preparing for a matter, start from the court's current bench.