Andrew S. Oldham

U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit circuit Appointed by Donald Trump (Republican) 26 signed orders read

Signed rulings

A grounded sample of orders signed by this judge, with the verbatim dispositive language.

United States v. Graves
17-11276 · 2018-11-08
Appeal (appellant) Denied

“Because the district court applied the correct legal standard and did not clearly err in finding Graves is a non-indigent person under 18 U.S.C. Section 3014, the district court's judgment is AFFIRMED.”

Gahagan v. U.S. Citizenship & Immigration Servs.
17-30898 · 2018-12-20
Appeal (appellant) Denied

“For these reasons, we hold pro se attorneys are ineligible for fee awards under FOIA. The judgments are AFFIRMED.”

In re Ultra Petroleum Corp.
17-20793 · 2019-01-17
Appeal (appellant) Granted

“For the reasons we have explained, we REVERSE in part, VACATE in part, and REMAND for further proceedings consistent with this opinion.”

Morrow v. Meachum
17-11243 · 2019-03-08
Appeal (appellant) Denied

“They have not identified a controlling precedent that 'squarely governs' the specific facts at issue. ... The judgment of the district court is AFFIRMED.”

BP Exploration & Production, Inc. v. Claimant ID 100281817
18-30394 · 2019-03-20
Appeal (appellant) Granted

“BP contested that determination because West 'lost' nothing... We reverse.”

Qorane v. Barr
17-60394 · 2019-03-26
Petition for review (petitioner) Denied

“He filed a petition for review asking us to revisit it instead. We deny the petition.”

Martinez Manzanares v. Barr
18-60315 · 2019-05-24
Petition for review (petitioner) Denied

“He now asks us to review the government's decision and to vacate the removal order. We deny the petition.”

Langley v. Prince (en banc)
16-30486 · 2019-06-06
Appeal (appellant) Denied

“Judgment AFFIRMED. Habeas DENIED.”

Hoyt v. Lane Construction Corp.
18-10389 · 2019-06-10
Appeal (appellant) Granted in part

“The district court did not err by denying the Hoyts' motions for remand but did err by granting Lane's motion for summary judgment. The judgment is AFFIRMED in part, VACATED in part, and REMANDED for further proceedings consistent with this opinion.”

Bon Secour Fisheries, Inc. v. BP Exploration & Prod., Inc. (In re Deepwater Horizon)
18-30858 · 2019-06-26
Appeal (appellant) Granted

“The district court's orders are inconsistent with our mandate in the Policy 495 Decision.”

MidCap Media Finance, L.L.C. v. Pathway Data, Inc.
18-50650 · 2019-07-09
Appeal (appellant) Moot / procedural

“Notwithstanding the parties' agreement, we have an independent obligation to assess our own jurisdiction... We remand to allow the district court to consider additional evidence regarding jurisdiction.”

United States v. Sanchez-Hernandez (substituted opinion)
18-40211 · 2019-07-25
Appeal (appellant) Denied

“AFFIRMED.”

Caseload & timing

From public federal docket records for this judge.

Circuit judges do not manage an assigned federal trial docket in their appellate role. Oldham had no prior judicial service before joining the Fifth Circuit.

Put Judge Oldham's record to work

Ezel drafts and answers grounded in this exact profile: how Judge Oldham actually rules, not a generic AI guess.

Opens in Ezel Pro. Every answer is grounded in Judge Oldham's own signed orders and cites them.