Alexander Campbell King

U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit circuit Deceased · served 1920–1926 Appointed by Woodrow Wilson (Democratic) 25 signed orders read

Judge King no longer hears cases. This profile is preserved as a historical record of how they ruled.

How Judge King decides

Patterns drawn from this judge's own signed orders. Every observation links to the order it came from.

What persuades

He required evidence that cane-syrup residue was actually fermented and fit to produce spirits before allowing a criminal conviction to stand.

“There is no evidence upon which a finding could be had that the defendant *569made any fermented skimmings, or that the skimmings were not merely the residuum lawfully remaining from the conversion of sugar cane into syrup.”

Procedural preferences

He treated subject-matter jurisdiction as a threshold issue the appellate court must examine even when the parties had not raised it.

“The United States District Court, therefore, had no jurisdiction of these cases.”

Cautions

He applied prior-judgment preclusion to prevent a bankruptcy trustee from reopening the validity of a mortgage already established in foreclosure.

“It is therefore not open to the trustee to now raise any question to such conclusion and judgment of the decree of foreclosure”

Signed rulings

A grounded sample of orders signed by this judge, with the verbatim dispositive language.

Whelchel v. Citizens' Bank of Moultrie
· 1924-10-21
Appeal (appellant) Denied

“The judgment of the court in increasing said debt by said amount is therefore affirmed.”

Wells v. Erwin
· 1924-10-28
Petition for review (petitioner) Moot / procedural

“The motion to dismiss is' therefore sustained, and the ease is ordered dismissed, on the above grounds.”

Murphy v. United States
· 1924-10-28
Appeal (plaintiff in error) Denied

“The judgment is therefore affirmed.”

Canal-Commercial Trust & Savings Bank v. Bank of Plant City
· 1922-02-04
Appeal (appellant) Denied

“The judgment of the District Court is affirmed.”

Pullman Co. v. Cuttle
· 1924-10-28
Appeal (plaintiff in error) Denied

“Affirmed.”

Hayden v. United States
· 1922-11-24
Appeal (plaintiff in error) Denied

“The judgment of the District Court is affirmed.”

Sutton v. United States
· 1923-05-17
Appeal (appellant) Denied

“The judgment of the District Court is affirmed.”

United States v. Clayton
· 1924-10-13
Appeal (United States) Granted

“The judgment is therefore reversed.”

Bowden v. Central Bank & Trust Corp.
· 1924-10-14
Appeal (intervenor) Denied

“The judgment is therefore affirmed.”

Swartz v. United States
· 1922-04-03
Appeal (defendants) Granted

“'The judgment of the District Court in each case is therefore reversed.”

Perry v. John Hancock Mutual Life Insurance Co.
· 1924-10-13
Appeal (appellant) Denied

“Judgment affirmed.”

Bank of Elberton v. Swift
· 1921-10-12
Petition for review (petitioner) Denied

“The petition to superintend and revise is therefore denied.”

A historical record

Judge King no longer hears cases. This profile stays available as a record of how they ruled. If you're preparing for a matter, start from the court's current bench.