Simon Ernest Sobeloff
Judge Sobeloff no longer hears cases. This profile is preserved as a historical record of how they ruled.
How Judge Sobeloff decides
Patterns drawn from this judge's own signed orders. Every observation links to the order it came from.
What persuades
Defers to labor-board findings when the whole record contains substantial evidence of discriminatory conduct.
“since there is substantial evidence for the Board’s conclusion that the discharges were discriminatory, we enforce its order”
Requires disability-review courts to examine informal administrative records closely for fairness and consistency with Congress's design.
“the courts closely scrutinize the administrative proceedings to insure a result consistent with congressional intent and elemental fairness.”
Procedural preferences
Treats venue as a waivable convenience rule rather than a limit on judicial power.
“Venue is a doctrine of convenience and is not jurisdictional”
Remands when inconsistent trial findings prevent meaningful appellate review of responsibility and indemnity.
“the place to resolve mutually repugnant findings and conclusions is ordinarily in the District Court, not here.”
Cautions
Will not sustain a criminal conviction resting only on an inference that is no stronger than innocent alternatives.
“no conviction may stand upon mere speculation”
Signed rulings
A grounded sample of orders signed by this judge, with the verbatim dispositive language.
“we deem it appropriate, with the consent of the District Court, to remand the case to that court for further consideration”
“the Board’s order is enforced in its entirety.”
“The judgment of the District Court is Affirmed.”
“Since there was substantial evidence to support the Hearing Examiner’s decision, the judgment of the District Court is Affirmed.”
“The judgment of the District Court is Affirmed.”
“the Secretary’s decision denying benefits is supported by substantial evidence. Therefore, the judgment of the District Court is Affirmed.”
“In these circumstances, the judgment of the District Court will be Affirmed.”
“the case will be remanded to the District Court for explicit findings clarifying whether or not Hollis was negligent, and to award or withhold indemnity accordingly. Remanded.”
“the District Court properly dismissed appellant’s complaint. Affirmed.”
A historical record
Judge Sobeloff no longer hears cases. This profile stays available as a record of how they ruled. If you're preparing for a matter, start from the court's current bench.