John A. Field Jr.

U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit circuit Deceased · served 1971–1995 Appointed by Richard M. Nixon (Republican) 25 signed orders read

Judge Field no longer hears cases. This profile is preserved as a historical record of how they ruled.

How Judge Field decides

Patterns drawn from this judge's own signed orders. Every observation links to the order it came from.

What persuades

Requires record material sufficient to eliminate factual disputes before a civil-rights claim is dismissed without an evidentiary hearing.

“the district court should ordinarily require that a dismissal or summary motion be supported by affidavit or other material sufficiently demonstrating that there is no factual issue and that dismissal is appropriate as a matter of law.”

Uses statutory purpose to construe transfer of a firearm to a carrier as requiring actual notice.

“custody” must be construed to mean a transfer of control in a manner which gives the carrier actual notice of the presence of a firearm.”

Procedural preferences

Will not terminate a contract claim on the pleadings when the governing regulation does not facially invalidate the disputed provision.

“it was error to grant defendant’s motion for judgment on the pleadings.”

Treats a fully tried jury issue and the trial judge's reasonable reading of the verdict exchange with substantial deference.

“Assuredly, there was no abuse of discretion by the district judge in denying the motion for a new trial on this point.”

Cautions

Applies the substantial-evidence standard as requiring enough relevant evidence for a reasonable mind to accept the conclusion.

“Substantial evidence means such relevant evidence as a reasonable mind might accept as adequate to support a conclusion.”

Rejects formal distinctions that do not affect the statutory tax question before the court.

“In the context of the issue before us this is a distinction of no consequence whatever.”

Signed rulings

A grounded sample of orders signed by this judge, with the verbatim dispositive language.

United States v. Woods
· 1974-10-29
Appeal (criminal-defendants-appellants) Denied

“AFFIRMED.”

Cook v. Bounds
· 1975-06-25
Appeal (prisoner-appellant) Denied

“Affirmed.”

Wooten v. Shook; Otey v. Puckett
· 1975-09-16
Appeal (prisoner-wooten-appellant) Denied

“No. 73-2213 affirmed;”

Appeal (prisoner-otey-appellant) Granted

“No. 73-2282 reversed and remanded.”

Clayton v. Haynes
· 1975-06-09
Appeal (state-warden-appellant) Granted

“Reversed and remanded with directions.”

Republic Mutual Insurance Co. v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Co.
· 1975-11-06
Appeal (insurer-plaintiff-appellant) Granted

“Reversed and remanded.”

United States v. Williams
· 1973-10-08
Appeal (criminal-defendant-appellant) Denied

“the judgment of the district court is Affirmed.”

Celanese Corp. v. Duplan Corp.
· 1974-08-15
Appeal (corporate-petitioners-appellants) Denied

“Affirmed in 73-1930. Affirmed in 73-2450.”

Gantt v. United States
· 1975-09-26
Appeal (taxpayer-appellant) Denied

“Affirmed.”

United States v. Lisk
· 1972-01-28
Appeal (criminal-defendant-appellant) Denied

“Affirmed.”

Stillman v. Edmund Scientific Co.
· 1975-09-02
Appeal (patent-claimant-appellant) Granted in part

“Reversed in part; remanded in part.”

Spangler v. Kranco, Inc.
· 1973-06-28
Appeal (injured-worker-appellant) Denied

“Affirmed.”

United States v. Deluxe Cleaners and Laundry, Inc.
· 1975-03-04
Appeal (government-appellant) Granted

“Reversed and remanded.”

A historical record

Judge Field no longer hears cases. This profile stays available as a record of how they ruled. If you're preparing for a matter, start from the court's current bench.