William Clark

U.S. Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit circuit Deceased · served 1938–1957 Appointed by Franklin D. Roosevelt (Democratic) 25 signed orders read

Judge Clark no longer hears cases. This profile is preserved as a historical record of how they ruled.

How Judge Clark decides

Patterns drawn from this judge's own signed orders. Every observation links to the order it came from.

What persuades

Treats bankruptcy discharge as relief for honest debtors while preserving denial as protection against continued fraud.

“A discharge is granted to an honest bankrupt in order that be may reinstate himself in the business world; it is refused to a dishonest bankrupt to prevent continuance of his frauds in the future.”

Allows precedent to be tested by persuasion while warning against artificial distinctions that avoid confronting controlling law.

“The principle of stare decisis 2 clearly does not go to the length of preclusion from persuasion.”

Procedural preferences

Recognizes that close negligence appeals often turn on the boundary between the roles of judge and jury.

“The question of this appeal is both narrow and close. Such closeness is often inherent in the discovery of the line of demarcation between the functions of court and jury.”

Sends a disputed railroad-safety issue to the jury rather than resolving it as a matter of law.

“We believe it properly for the consideration of a jury and not of a court.”

Cautions

Requires especially careful appellate protection against actual injustice in criminal cases.

“Because the Congress has seen fit to adjust the balance between the community and its accused members, those courts should be all the more zealous in their protection of those unfortunate individuals from actual injustice.”

Places truth ahead of finality when a judgment was allegedly procured through concealed assets and fraud.

“We believe truth is more important than the trouble it takes to get it.”

Signed rulings

A grounded sample of orders signed by this judge, with the verbatim dispositive language.

Equitable Trust Co. v. Schwebel
· 1942-03-28
Appeal (co-trustee appellant) Denied

“The decree of the District Court is affirmed.”

In re Levy
· 1942-03-26
Appeal (bankrupt appellant) Granted

“The order of the District Judge is reversed.”

Ætna Life Ins. v. Young
· 1940-06-29
Appeal (insurer appellant) Denied

“The judgment of the District Court is affirmed.”

Dunn v. Reading Trust Co.
· 1941-06-30
Appeal (bank appellant) Denied

“The judgment of the District Court is affirmed.”

In re Pittsburgh Rys. Co.
· 1941-02-04
Appeal (county appellant) Denied

“The order of the District Court is affirmed.”

Chicago Telephone Supply Co. v. Stackpole Carbon Co.
· 1940-06-29
Appeal (patent-owner appellant) Denied

“The decree of the District Court dismissing the bill of complaint is affirmed.”

Pierce v. Connecticut General Life Ins.
· 1939-10-04
Appeal (plaintiff appellant) Denied

“The judgment of the District Court is affirmed.”

Janssen v. Bank of PittsBurgh Nat. Ass'n
· 1940-09-27
Appeal (bank receiver appellant) Denied

“The judgment of the District Court is affirmed.”

Commissioner of Internal Revenue v. Taylor
· 1941-08-22
Appeal (Commissioner of Internal Revenue petitioner) Granted

“The decision of the Board allowing the other three exclusions is reversed, and the cause is remanded with direction to reassess in accordance with this opinion.”

Rieck v. Commissioner
· 1941-02-07
Appeal (taxpayer petitioner) Denied

“The decision of the Board of Tax Appeals is affirmed.”

Merion Cricket Club v. United States
· 1941-03-28
Appeal (club taxpayer appellant) Denied

“The judgment of the District Court is affirmed.”

Cawman v. Pennsylvania-Reading Seashore Lines
· 1940-03-27
Appeal (plaintiff appellant) Granted

“The judgment of the District Court is reversed and a new trial granted.”

A historical record

Judge Clark no longer hears cases. This profile stays available as a record of how they ruled. If you're preparing for a matter, start from the court's current bench.