Robert E. Cowen

How Judge Cowen rules, drawn from 28 signed orders. Every observation links to the order it came from.

Judge Cowen no longer sits on this court. This profile is preserved as a historical record of how they ruled here.

Court
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit
Position
Circuit judge
Status
No longer serving
Appointed by
Ronald Reagan (Republican)
Commissioned
November 9, 1987
Education
Drake University (B.S., 1952); Rutgers School of Law--Newark (LL.B., 1958)
Signed orders read
28

About Judge Cowen

Robert E. Cowen served on the United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit after receiving his commission on November 9, 1987. He assumed senior status on September 4, 1998, and inactive status on April 1, 2022. He briefly resumed active service to resolve one matter in July 2022.

Signed rulings

A grounded sample of orders signed by this judge, with the verbatim dispositive language.

Fallon Electric Co. v. Cincinnati Insurance Co.
96-3559, 96-3560 · 1997-07-30
Appeal (appellant) Granted

“We will vacate the judgment of the district court and remand with instructions to enter judgment in favor of CIC in the amount of $87,752.24 in attorney's fees and $1,417.00 in expenses heretofore approved.”

Li Wu Lin v. Immigration & Naturalization Service
00-1849 · 2001-01-24
Petition for review (petitioner) Granted

“We conclude that Lin has satisfied both the standards for political asylum and those for withholding of deportation.”

McLaughlin v. Watson
00-2377, 01-1372 · 2001-11-20
Appeal (appellant (defendant U.S. Attorney)) Granted

“Because we conclude that the District Court erred in denying Defendant the protection of qualified immunity, we will reverse.”

Al-Fara v. Gonzales
02-4580 · 2005-04-14
Petition for review (petitioner) Denied

“Al-Fara challenges the propriety of the BIA's summary affirmance in his case. For the following reasons, we will deny the petition for review.”

United States v. Bruce
02-3316 · 2005-04-28
Appeal (appellant) Denied

“Bruce appeals, raising constitutional and sufficiency of the evidence challenges to the extortion convictions. ... We will affirm.”

United States v. Mussare
02-3301 · 2005-04-28
Appeal (appellant) Denied

“Mussare appeals, raising various constitutional and evidentiary challenges to the extortion convictions. He also appeals his sentence. We will affirm.”

Brennan v. Kulick
04-1866 · 2005-05-13
Appeal (appellant) Granted

“Accordingly, we will reverse the March 1, 2004 order of dismissal with prejudice and will remand this case to the District Court for it to consider whether Brennan has complied with the conditions of the January 27, 2003 order of dismissal without prejudice.”

Callison v. City of Philadelphia
04-2941 · 2005-05-19
Appeal (appellant) Denied

“We have jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1291 and will affirm.”

Emerson Electrical Supply Co. v. Estes Express Lines Corp.
05-2654 · 2006-06-16
Appeal (appellant) Denied

“The court concluded that Estes could not limit its liability pursuant to its tariff because it failed to provide Emerson two or more different rates. We will affirm.”

Sukwanputra v. Gonzales
04-3336 · 2006-01-19
Petition for review (petitioner) Granted

“For the reasons stated below, we will grant the petition, vacate the order of the BIA, and remand for further proceedings consistent with this opinion.”

Knoepfler v. Guardian Life Insurance Co. of America
05-1186 · 2006-02-27
Appeal (appellant) Granted

“Because we predict that the New Jersey Supreme Court would construe the policy language to require proof of loss after the end of the entire period of disability, we will reverse.”

Ditch v. Grace
05-3614 · 2007-03-01
Appeal (appellant) Denied

“For the reasons stated below, we will affirm the order of the District Court.”

Caseload & timing

From public federal docket records for this judge.

Circuit judges do not carry a trial caseload; not enumerated.

A historical record

Judge Cowen no longer sits on this court. This profile stays available as a record of how they ruled here. If you're preparing for a matter, start from the court's current bench.