Julio M. Fuentes

“We therefore vacate the BIA’s order and remand the matter for further proceedings consistent with this opinion.”

“We accordingly affirm the District Court’s decision dismissing those portions of Pridgen’s Rule 60(b) motion that represented challenges to his state conviction, and were not authorized under 28 U.S.C. § 2244(b)(3). We also affirm the District Court’s denial of Pridgen’s “properly filed” claim because Pridgen failed to satisfy AEDPA’s limitations period.”

“For the foregoing reasons, we deny Yang’s petition for review. Hence, a fortiori, we reject his application for withholding of removal.”

“Accordingly, the judgment of the District Court will be affirmed.”

“Petitioner has failed to demonstrate that the BIA or IJ erred in rejecting his application for asylum, withholding of removal, and relief under the Convention Against Torture. For the reasons discussed above, we will deny the petition.”

“For the foregoing reasons, we affirm in part and reverse in part the judgment of the District Court.”

“Therefore, we grant the petition for review and remand for further proceedings.”

“Accordingly, we grant Mahn’s petition for review and vacate the BIA’s order of removal.”

“We will therefore affirm the order of the District Court and remand for assessment of wages owed to McMaster and for additional proceedings relating to the other members of the conditional class.”

“Because Mirza filed his complaint before the expiration of this six-year limitations period, we vacate and remand for further proceedings.”

“Therefore, we lack jurisdiction to review this unexecuted search warrant and we dismiss Fattah’s claims under the Speech or Debate Clause.”

“Because we find that Athena waived its right to challenge the arbitration award, we reverse the District Court’s order vacating the award.”