Jane R. Roth

U.S. Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit circuit Appointed by George H. W. Bush (Republican) 29 signed orders read

Signed rulings

A grounded sample of orders signed by this judge, with the verbatim dispositive language.

Government of the Virgin Islands v. Parrilla
· 1993-10-12
Appeal (appellant (defendant Luis Parrilla)) Granted

“Because we find that section 1341(b) does create an impermissible mandatory presumption, we will reverse Parrilla's conviction on Count VII.”

Tipu v. Immigration & Naturalization Service
· 1994-04-05
Petition for review (petitioner (Mohammad Zafar Tipu)) Granted

“As we conclude that the BIA failed to properly consider important factors in Tipu's favor, we will vacate the decision of the BIA and remand this case for further proceedings consistent with this opinion.”

Chang v. Immigration & Naturalization Service
· 1997-07-22
Petition for review (petitioner (Fengchu Chang, asylum applicant)) Granted

“We disagree and will grant Chang's petition.”

United States v. Sherman
· 1998-11-16
Appeal (appellant (defendant Dr. Henry Sherman)) Denied

“We will affirm the judgment of the trial court.”

United States v. Iasiello
· 1999-01-22
Appeal (appellant (movant Paul G. Iasiello)) Granted

“Accordingly, we will vacate the judgment of the District Court and remand this case to the District Court to appoint counsel and hold a new evidentiary hearing.”

Keating v. Whitmore Manufacturing Co.
· 1999-08-02
Appeal (appellant (plaintiff Janice Keating, widow)) Denied

“We will, therefore, affirm the judgment of the District Court.”

Kane v. BOC Group, Inc.
· 2000-10-17
Appeal (appellant (third-party plaintiff The BOC Group, Inc.)) Granted

“For the reasons stated below, we will vacate the final judgment and remand this case to the District Court for further proceedings consistent with this opinion.”

Burgh v. Borough Council of the Borough of Montrose
· 2001-05-25
Appeal (appellant (plaintiff Timothy M. Burgh)) Granted

“For the reasons that follow, we will reverse the grant of summary judgment and remand both claims to the District Court for further proceedings consistent with this opinion.”

Chisolm v. McManimon
· 2001-12-28
Appeal (appellant (plaintiff Ronald Chisolm)) Granted

“Because we conclude that there are genuine issues of material fact, we will reverse the granting of summary judgment by the District Court and remand this case for further proceedings consistent with this opinion.”

Lam v. Kelchner
· 2002-09-10
Appeal (appellant (Commonwealth / warden) and cross-appellant (petitioner Choi Chun Lam)) Granted in part

“Applying the narrow scope of review available under 28 U.S.C. Section 2254 (1996), we will affirm the District Court's decision to grant habeas relief based on Lam's responses, but we will reverse its decision to grant relief based on their fruits.”

United States v. Freeman
· 2003-01-06
Appeal (appellant (defendant Robb Walker Freeman)) Granted

“We will vacate both the District Court's upward departure and its supervised release condition.”

Lucas v. Township of Bethel
· 2003-02-11
Appeal (appellants (plaintiff landowners)) Granted

“We will reverse the District Court's dismissal of this action.”

Put Judge Roth's record to work

Ezel drafts and answers grounded in this exact profile: how Judge Roth actually rules, not a generic AI guess.

Opens in Ezel Pro. Every answer is grounded in Judge Roth's own signed orders and cites them.