Francis Beverley Biddle

U.S. Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit circuit Deceased · served 1939–1968 Appointed by Franklin D. Roosevelt (Democratic) 20 signed orders read

Judge Biddle no longer hears cases. This profile is preserved as a historical record of how they ruled.

How Judge Biddle decides

Patterns drawn from this judge's own signed orders. Every observation links to the order it came from.

What persuades

Applies simplified federal pleading rules to preserve a negligence claim stated with enough notice to identify the alleged defect.

“all pleadings shall be so construed as to do substantial justice”

Refuses a lease forfeiture that bears no relation to liquidated damages and would operate only as a penalty.

“Here too the forfeiture bears no relation to any liquidated damages, and as a penalty will not be enforced.”

Procedural preferences

Treats settled decisions of a state’s highest court as binding while regarding intermediate state decisions as persuasive rather than controlling.

“A fixed and settled rule of decision in a state court of last resort establishes the law. of the state in such manner as to bind the federal courts in all matters controlled by the state law”

Requires compelling reasons before using appellate discretion to excuse substantial delay in preparing a criminal appeal.

“Compelling reasons only should move us in exercising discretion in appellant’s favor. No such reasons appear.”

Cautions

Allows agency to be inferred from an employer’s acts and a supervisor’s authority, but requires evidence linking those acts to the employer.

“Authority may be deduced from acts of the employer coupled with the type of the employee’s authority, which make probable the link.”

Requires proof that an allegedly defective product actually caused the injuries supporting the verdict.

“Clearly the evidence must show that the injuries on which the verdict was based were caused by the use of the defective toilet preparation.”

Signed rulings

A grounded sample of orders signed by this judge, with the verbatim dispositive language.

O'Brien v. Calmar S. S. Corp.
· 1939-05-16
Appeal (seaman plaintiff appellant) Denied

“Judgment affirmed.”

United States Guarantee Co. v. Elkins
· 1939-08-03
Appeal (insurer appellant) Denied

“We conclude that the judgment must be affirmed.”

Luckenbach S. S. Co. v. Norton
· 1939-08-03
Appeal (shipowner appellant) Denied

“The judgment of the District Court is affirmed. .”

Carbon Silk Mills Co. v. Powell
· 1939-12-18
Appeal (silk mill appellant) Denied

“The judgment is affirmed.”

Miller v. United States
· 1939-05-16
Appeal (criminal-defendant appellant) Moot / procedural

“The motion to dismiss the appeal is granted.”

Sierocinski v. E. I. Du Pont De Nemours & Co.
· 1939-04-24
Appeal (injured plaintiff appellant) Granted

“The judgment is reversed, and the cause remanded for further proceedings.”

Pittsburgh Parking Garages, Inc. v. United States
· 1939-11-28
Appeal (vehicle owner appellant) Granted

“Accordingly the order of the District Court is reversed, with directions to proceed in conformity with this opinion.”

City of Philadelphia v. Straub
· 1939-08-09
Appeal (city appellant) Denied

“Judgment affirmed.”

Missouri-Kansas Pipe Line Co. v. United States
· 1939-12-15
Appeal (pipeline company appellants) Moot / procedural

“The appeals are therefore dismissed.”

Elizabeth Arden, Inc. v. Brown
· 1939-11-28
Appeal (manufacturer and retailer appellants) Granted

“The judgment in favor of the plaintiffs is accordingly reversed, and the District Court is directed to enter judgments in favor of both these appellants.”

Galion Iron Works & Mfg. Co. v. Beckwith MacHinery Co.
· 1939-06-30
Appeal (patent-owner appellant) Denied

“Order affirmed.”

Commissioner v. Germantown Trust Co.
· 1939-07-14
Appeal (Commissioner of Internal Revenue petitioner) Granted

“' We decide therefore that we have jurisdiction; that section 275(c) is applicable ; and that the decision of the Board of Tax Appeals must be reversed.' The record is remanded to the Board of Tax Appeals with the direction to determine the taxpayer’s appeal on the merits.”

A historical record

Judge Biddle no longer hears cases. This profile stays available as a record of how they ruled. If you're preparing for a matter, start from the court's current bench.