Arlin M. Adams

U.S. Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit circuit Retired 1987 · served 1969–1987 Appointed by Richard M. Nixon (Republican) 31 signed orders read

Judge Adams no longer hears cases. This profile is preserved as a historical record of how they ruled.

Signed rulings

A grounded sample of orders signed by this judge, with the verbatim dispositive language.

Government of the Virgin Islands v. Paul Testamark
· 1978-01-10
Appeal (appellant (Paul Testamark (criminal defendant))) Denied

“Accordingly, the conviction will be affirmed.”

United States v. Raymond Carter
· 1978-05-23
Appeal (appellant (Raymond Carter (criminal defendant))) Denied

“Accordingly, the judgment of the district court will be affirmed.”

Daughters of Miriam Center for the Aged v. Mathews
· 1978-12-29
Appeal (appellant (Daughters of Miriam Center for the Aged (provider))) Granted in part

“The judgment of the district court will be reversed with respect to the recapture of the excess of accelerated depreciation over straight-line depreciation for fiscal periods ending on or before December 31, 1969.”

Tilden Financial Corporation v. Palo Tire Service, Inc.
· 1979-04-18
Appeal (appellant (Palo Tire Service, Inc. (defendant))) Denied

“We conclude that we have jurisdiction, and affirm the judgment of the district court.”

Jones & Laughlin Steel Corp. v. Marshall
· 1980-11-13
Petition for review (petitioner) Granted in part

“Accordingly, the Commission's determination that petitioner violated the Occupational Safety and Health Act will be affirmed. Pursuant to the agreement of the parties, the Commission's judgment that these violations are "repeated" is vacated, and the proceedings will be remanded with instructions to reduce the characterization of the violations from "repeated" to "nonserious," and to reduce the penalty from $180 to $90 in each proceeding.”

United States v. Dominick J. Mariano
· 1981-05-01
Appeal (appellant (Dominick J. Mariano (criminal defendant))) Denied

“Accordingly, the judgment of the district court will be affirmed.”

Donna M. Murillo v. W. Lewis Bambrick, Clerk of the Superior Court of New Jersey
· 1982-06-17
Appeal (appellant (W. Lewis Bambrick, Clerk of the Superior Court of New Jersey (defendant))) Granted

“Accordingly, the judgment of the district court will be reversed, and the matter will be remanded to that court for further proceedings consistent with this opinion.”

The Township of Lower Alloways Creek v. Public Service Electric & Gas Company
· 1982-08-27
Petition for review (petitioner) Denied

“For the foregoing reasons, the petition for review will be denied.”

Elsa Garcia v. Immigration and Naturalization Service
· 1982-10-06
Petition for review (petitioner) Moot / procedural

“For the foregoing reasons, the petition for review will be dismissed for want of jurisdiction.”

United States v. Ruth M. Anderson
· 1983-04-06
Appeal (appellant (Ruth M. Anderson (criminal defendant))) Denied

“The judgment of the district court, 535 F.Supp. 1230, will be affirmed.”

Madesky v. Campbell
· 1983-04-28
Appeal (appellant (Matthew T. Madesky (plaintiff-employee))) Granted

“Accordingly, the order of dismissal will be vacated and the case remanded so that the district court may consider alternative sanctions in accordance with Donnelly, and place on the record the fact that it has considered alternative sanctions less severe than dismissal in accordance with Titus.”

State of New Jersey, Dept. of Education v. Hufstedler
· 1984-02-17
Petition for review (petitioner) Granted

“Accordingly, this matter will be remanded to the Secretary for proceedings consistent with this opinion.”

A historical record

Judge Adams no longer hears cases. This profile stays available as a record of how they ruled. If you're preparing for a matter, start from the court's current bench.