Thomas Joseph Meskill

How Judge Meskill rules, drawn from 29 signed orders. Every observation links to the order it came from.

Judge Meskill no longer hears cases. This profile is preserved as a historical record of how they ruled.

Court
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit
Position
circuit
Status
Deceased
Served
1975–2007
Appointed by
Gerald Ford (Republican)
Commissioned
1975-04-23
Education
Trinity College (Hartford), B.S., 1950; University of Connecticut School of Law, LL.B., 1956
Signed orders read
29

How Judge Meskill decides

Patterns drawn from this judge's own signed orders. Every observation links to the order it came from.

What persuades

Enforced arbitration agreements strictly as the parties wrote them, holding a court cannot compel consolidation of separate arbitrations for efficiency's sake when the contracts did not provide for it.

“a district court cannot order consolidation of arbitration proceedings arising from separate agreements to arbitrate absent the parties' agreement to allow such consolidation.”

Procedural preferences

Required a searching, on-the-record inquiry before treating a fundamental trial right as waived, refusing to accept a non-unanimous verdict merely because defense counsel proposed it.

“Before we could conclude that such an important right had been waived, we would have to be satisfied that the trial judge had made a searching inquiry”

Signed rulings

A grounded sample of orders signed by this judge, with the verbatim dispositive language.

National Labor Relations Board v. Lance Investigation Service, Inc.
· 1982-05-13
Petition for review (petitioner) Granted

“Enforcement granted.”

Shop & Save Food Markets, Inc. v. Pneumo Corporation
· 1982-07-02
Appeal (appellant) Denied

“For the reasons set forth below, we affirm the judgment of the district court.”

United States v. Selwyn Chavis
· 1983-10-14
Appeal (appellant) Granted

“We agree and reverse and remand for a new trial.”

Lorentz W. Hansen v. Prentice-Hall, Inc.
· 1986-04-16
Appeal (appellant) Denied

“Affirmed.”

Aston v. Secretary of Health and Human Services
· 1986-12-24
Appeal (appellant) Granted in part

“We disagree but reduce the hourly rate to $75 and affirm the judgment as amended.”

Widett v. United States Fidelity and Guaranty Company
· 1987-04-09
Appeal (appellant) Denied

“We affirm.”

Johnson Chemical Company, Inc. v. Home Care Products, Inc.
· 1987-07-07
Appeal (appellant) Granted

“For the reasons that follow, we reverse.”

C. Russell Kelleran, Jr. v. Slavko Andrijevic
· 1987-08-04
Appeal (appellant) Granted

“Reversed and remanded.”

Barhold v. Rodriguez
· 1988-12-08
Appeal (appellant) Granted in part

“we vacate the judgment of the district court granting Division's motion for summary judgment and remand this case to the district court for further proceedings.”

Harry Green v. Otis R. Bowen, Secretary of Health and Human Services
· 1989-06-09
Appeal (appellant) Granted

“We reverse the district court's decision and remand the case for further proceedings.”

United States v. Joseph Giaimo
· 1989-07-25
Appeal (appellant) Denied

“We affirm.”

United States v. Christopher Patrick
· 1990-03-27
Appeal (appellant) Granted

“Because the law enforcement officials had probable cause to detain and arrest Patrick, we reverse and remand.”

A historical record

Judge Meskill no longer hears cases. This profile stays available as a record of how they ruled. If you're preparing for a matter, start from the court's current bench.