Reena Raggi
Signed rulings
A grounded sample of orders signed by this judge, with the verbatim dispositive language.
“We reject these claims as without merit and hereby affirm the judgment of conviction.”
“Having received the Court of Appeals' response, ... we now affirm the district court's award of summary judgment in its entirety.”
“We now answer that question in the negative and, accordingly, affirm the judgment of dismissal.”
“As Judge Weinstein correctly observed, even though the predicate acts proved in this case were outside the statute of limitations, other trial evidence permitted the jury to conclude that both the charged racketeering conspiracy and Pizzonia's membership in it continued into the limitations period. Accordingly, we affirm the judgment of conviction.”
“We conclude that it does not and, accordingly, reverse the judgment of the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York ... insofar as it vacated that part of an arbitration award requiring respondent EMC National Life Company ... to pay such fees to petitioner ReliaStar Life Insurance Co. of New York.”
“Accordingly, the challenged judgment is REVERSED and the case REMANDED with instructions to award [EAJA fees].”
“Because we identify no error in the first sentencing challenge, we need not address the second, as any error would necessarily be harmless beyond a reasonable doubt. ... Accordingly, the judgment of conviction is hereby AFFIRMED.”
“We conclude that New York law permits the debtor to exempt the annuity payments and that he gave consideration for the contract when he released a wrongful death claim. AFFIRMED.”
“Because defendant's Santos-based claim is procedurally barred, the money laundering count of conviction should not have been vacated. All other arguments raised by the parties on these cross-appeals are moot. AMENDED JUDGMENT VACATED AND PRIOR JUDGMENT REINSTATED.”
“Accordingly, like the Trustee, the bankruptcy court, and the district court, we conclude that appellants do not qualify as BLMIS 'customers' under SIPA.”
“Like the district court, we conclude that plaintiffs fail as a matter of law to plead a fiduciary relationship and, accordingly, affirm the challenged judgment.”
“The argument is defeated by the reasoning this court employed to construe U.S.S.G. 2B1.1(b)(11)(C)(ii) in United States v. Sash, which we here conclude applies equally to U.S.S.G. 2B1.1(b)(11)(C)(i).”
Put Judge Raggi's record to work
Ezel drafts and answers grounded in this exact profile: how Judge Raggi actually rules, not a generic AI guess.
Opens in Ezel Pro. Every answer is grounded in Judge Raggi's own signed orders and cites them.