Reena Raggi

U.S. Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit circuit Appointed by George W. Bush (Republican) 26 signed orders read

Signed rulings

A grounded sample of orders signed by this judge, with the verbatim dispositive language.

United States v. Florez
05-2999-cr · 2006-05-03
Appeal (appellant (defendant Jose Dorance Florez)) Denied

“We reject these claims as without merit and hereby affirm the judgment of conviction.”

ITC Ltd. v. Punchgini, Inc.
05-4192-cv · 2008-02-26
Appeal (appellant (plaintiffs ITC Limited and ITC Hotels)) Denied

“Having received the Court of Appeals' response, ... we now affirm the district court's award of summary judgment in its entirety.”

Ajlani v. Chertoff
07-1568-cv · 2008-10-07
Appeal (appellant (plaintiff Majed Ajlani)) Denied

“We now answer that question in the negative and, accordingly, affirm the judgment of dismissal.”

United States v. Pizzonia
07-4314-cr · 2009-08-19
Appeal (appellant (defendant Dominick Pizzonia)) Denied

“As Judge Weinstein correctly observed, even though the predicate acts proved in this case were outside the statute of limitations, other trial evidence permitted the jury to conclude that both the charged racketeering conspiracy and Pizzonia's membership in it continued into the limitations period. Accordingly, we affirm the judgment of conviction.”

ReliaStar Life Insurance Co. of New York v. EMC National Life Co.
07-0828-cv · 2009-04-09
Appeal (appellant (ReliaStar Life Insurance Co.)) Granted

“We conclude that it does not and, accordingly, reverse the judgment of the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York ... insofar as it vacated that part of an arbitration award requiring respondent EMC National Life Company ... to pay such fees to petitioner ReliaStar Life Insurance Co. of New York.”

Ericksson v. Commissioner of Social Security
07-3627-cv · 2009-02-19
Appeal (appellant (plaintiff Sandra Ericksson)) Granted

“Accordingly, the challenged judgment is REVERSED and the case REMANDED with instructions to award [EAJA fees].”

United States v. Parker
08-4199-cr · 2009-08-14
Appeal (appellant (defendant Travious Parker)) Denied

“Because we identify no error in the first sentencing challenge, we need not address the second, as any error would necessarily be harmless beyond a reasonable doubt. ... Accordingly, the judgment of conviction is hereby AFFIRMED.”

In re Baker (Swimelar v. Baker)
09-4656-bk · 2010-05-14
Appeal (appellant (Chapter 13 Trustee Mark W. Swimelar)) Denied

“We conclude that New York law permits the debtor to exempt the annuity payments and that he gave consideration for the contract when he released a wrongful death claim. AFFIRMED.”

United States v. Thorn
11-37-cr(L) · 2011-10-20
Appeal (cross-appellant (United States)) Granted

“Because defendant's Santos-based claim is procedurally barred, the money laundering count of conviction should not have been vacated. All other arguments raised by the parties on these cross-appeals are moot. AMENDED JUDGMENT VACATED AND PRIOR JUDGMENT REINSTATED.”

Kruse v. Securities Investor Protection Corp. (In re Bernard L. Madoff Inv. Sec. LLC)
12-0389-bk · 2013-02-22
Appeal (appellants (indirect Madoff investors via feeder funds)) Denied

“Accordingly, like the Trustee, the bankruptcy court, and the district court, we conclude that appellants do not qualify as BLMIS 'customers' under SIPA.”

Johnson v. Priceline.com, Inc.
12-1744-cv · 2013-03-27
Appeal (appellants (plaintiffs Lee Johnson and Joey Marie Kelly, putative class)) Denied

“Like the district court, we conclude that plaintiffs fail as a matter of law to plead a fiduciary relationship and, accordingly, affirm the challenged judgment.”

United States v. Kleiner
13-2949-cr · 2014-09-02
Appeal (appellant (defendant Cary Lee Kleiner)) Denied

“The argument is defeated by the reasoning this court employed to construe U.S.S.G. 2B1.1(b)(11)(C)(ii) in United States v. Sash, which we here conclude applies equally to U.S.S.G. 2B1.1(b)(11)(C)(i).”

Put Judge Raggi's record to work

Ezel drafts and answers grounded in this exact profile: how Judge Raggi actually rules, not a generic AI guess.

Opens in Ezel Pro. Every answer is grounded in Judge Raggi's own signed orders and cites them.