Raymond J. Lohier, Jr.
Signed rulings
A grounded sample of orders signed by this judge, with the verbatim dispositive language.
“We therefore affirm the District Court's judgment dismissing UBS's claims and affirm its order denying UBS's motion to enjoin arbitration.”
“For the foregoing reasons, we VACATE in part and AFFIRM in part the order of the District Court, and we REMAND for further proceedings consistent with this opinion.”
“Because we conclude that the applicable regulations and the United States Department of Health and Human Services' interpretation of those regulations support Lopes's position, we AFFIRM the judgment of the District Court.”
“For the foregoing reasons, the judgment of the District Court is AFFIRMED.”
“We therefore vacate and remand with instructions to reinstate the jury verdict with respect to Newton's Fourteenth Amendment claim and to reconsider Newton's First Amendment claim in light of this opinion.”
“We conclude that the State Court decision was, to the contrary, an adjudication on the merits entitled to AEDPA deference and not so lacking in justification as to warrant habeas relief. Accordingly, we reverse the decision of the District Court.”
“For the foregoing reasons and those set forth in the accompanying summary order, we AFFIRM the judgment of conviction of the District Court.”
“For the foregoing reasons, we certify the following question to the New York Court of Appeals: Do sections 8-102(16)(c) and 8-107(l)(a) of the New York City Administrative Code preclude a plaintiff from bringing a disability discrimination claim based solely on a perception of untreated alcoholism? ... Decision is RESERVED.”
“For the foregoing reasons, the order of the District Court is VACATED and the matter is REMANDED to the District Court with instructions to determine a reasonable award of attorneys' fees consistent with this opinion. Plaintiffs-appellants are also entitled to recover reasonable attorneys' fees in connection with this appeal.”
“Proceeding to the merits, we conclude that sufficient evidence supported Caltabiano's conviction on the mail fraud counts, that he waived his primary challenge to the District Court's jury instructions, and that his sentence was not procedurally unreasonable. We therefore AFFIRM.”
“As explained below, we VACATE the judgment of the District Court and REMAND for further proceedings consistent with this opinion.”
“We have considered Holcombe's remaining arguments and conclude that they are without merit. For the foregoing reasons, the judgment of the District Court is AFFIRMED.”
Put Judge Lohier's record to work
Ezel drafts and answers grounded in this exact profile: how Judge Lohier actually rules, not a generic AI guess.
Opens in Ezel Pro. Every answer is grounded in Judge Lohier's own signed orders and cites them.