Myrna Pérez

U.S. Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit circuit Appointed by Joe Biden (Democratic) 26 signed orders read

Signed rulings

A grounded sample of orders signed by this judge, with the verbatim dispositive language.

United States v. Lefebvre
23-6485 · 2024-09-26
Appeal (appellant (defendant Varian Lefebvre)) Denied

“Because we agree with the district court that Lefebvre's seizure did not rise to the level of a de facto arrest, and because the seizure was nonetheless supported by probable cause, we affirm the judgment of the district court.”

In re Frasers Group PLC
23-7635 · 2024-03-04
Appeal (appellant (applicant Frasers Group PLC)) Denied

“We have considered Frasers's remaining arguments and find them to be without merit. Accordingly, we AFFIRM the order of the district court.”

Bd. of Trs. of the Bakery Drivers Local 550 v. Pension Benefit Guaranty Corp.
23-7868 · 2025-04-29
Appeal (appellant (plaintiff pension fund)) Granted

“Because we do not read the pertinent provision of the SFA statute to exclude plans based solely on a prior termination, we REVERSE the judgment of the district court and REMAND with instruction to (1) enter summary judgment for the Fund, (2) vacate the PBGC's denial of the Fund's SFA application, and (3) remand to the PBGC for reconsideration.”

American Cruise Lines v. United States
22-1029 · 2024-03-15
Petition for review (petitioner (American Cruise Lines)) Denied

“We have considered American Cruise Lines' remaining arguments and find them to be without merit. For the foregoing reasons, we AFFIRM the final decision of the United States Maritime Administration.”

United States v. Bradley
24-935 · 2024-12-23
Appeal (appellant (defendant John Bradley)) Denied

“For these reasons, the judgment of the district court revoking Bradley's supervised release is AFFIRMED.”

United States v. Harry
23-7106 · 2025-03-07
Appeal (appellant (defendant Kenston Harry)) Denied

“The government's use of a stationary pole camera for 50 days to capture scenes from the exterior of the Defendant's business that were readily visible to the public did not constitute a Fourth Amendment search. ... We therefore AFFIRM the judgment of the district court.”

Del Rio v. Amazon.com.dedc, LLC
23-1337 · 2025-03-17
Appeal (appellants (plaintiff warehouse employees)) Moot / procedural

“For the reasons set forth in this opinion, we CERTIFY the following questions to the Connecticut Supreme Court ... This panel retains jurisdiction to resolve this appeal after the disposition of the certification by the Connecticut Supreme Court.”

Camburn v. Novartis Pharmaceuticals Corp.
22-2708 · 2024-12-27
Appeal (appellant (relator-plaintiff Steven M. Camburn)) Granted in part

“We therefore AFFIRM the district court's dismissal order in part, and VACATE the judgment and REMAND in part for proceedings consistent with this opinion.”

United States v. Silva
24-2180 (L) · 2025-07-24
Appeal (appellant (the government)) Granted

“For the reasons described above, we VACATE the order of the district court and REMAND for further proceedings consistent with this opinion.”

The Resource Group International Ltd. v. Chishti
23-286 · 2024-01-22
Appeal (appellants (plaintiffs, the TRGI parties)) Granted

“For the foregoing reasons, we VACATE the order of the district court denying the TRGI Plaintiffs' motion for preliminary injunction and REMAND this case to the district court for further proceedings consistent with this opinion.”

Sunvestment Energy Group NY 64 LLC v. National Grid USA Services Co.
23-1213 · 2024-09-06
Appeal (appellants (plaintiff solar generators)) Denied

“For the reasons stated above, we AFFIRM the judgment of the district court dismissing the complaint for lack of subject-matter jurisdiction.”

Knox v. CRC Management Co.
23-121 · 2025-04-09
Appeal (appellant (plaintiff Natasha Knox)) Granted

“Accordingly, the judgment of the district court is VACATED and the case is REMANDED for further proceedings consistent with this opinion.”

Put Judge Pérez's record to work

Ezel drafts and answers grounded in this exact profile: how Judge Pérez actually rules, not a generic AI guess.

Opens in Ezel Pro. Every answer is grounded in Judge Pérez's own signed orders and cites them.