Myrna Pérez
Signed rulings
A grounded sample of orders signed by this judge, with the verbatim dispositive language.
“Because we agree with the district court that Lefebvre's seizure did not rise to the level of a de facto arrest, and because the seizure was nonetheless supported by probable cause, we affirm the judgment of the district court.”
“We have considered Frasers's remaining arguments and find them to be without merit. Accordingly, we AFFIRM the order of the district court.”
“Because we do not read the pertinent provision of the SFA statute to exclude plans based solely on a prior termination, we REVERSE the judgment of the district court and REMAND with instruction to (1) enter summary judgment for the Fund, (2) vacate the PBGC's denial of the Fund's SFA application, and (3) remand to the PBGC for reconsideration.”
“We have considered American Cruise Lines' remaining arguments and find them to be without merit. For the foregoing reasons, we AFFIRM the final decision of the United States Maritime Administration.”
“For these reasons, the judgment of the district court revoking Bradley's supervised release is AFFIRMED.”
“The government's use of a stationary pole camera for 50 days to capture scenes from the exterior of the Defendant's business that were readily visible to the public did not constitute a Fourth Amendment search. ... We therefore AFFIRM the judgment of the district court.”
“For the reasons set forth in this opinion, we CERTIFY the following questions to the Connecticut Supreme Court ... This panel retains jurisdiction to resolve this appeal after the disposition of the certification by the Connecticut Supreme Court.”
“We therefore AFFIRM the district court's dismissal order in part, and VACATE the judgment and REMAND in part for proceedings consistent with this opinion.”
“For the reasons described above, we VACATE the order of the district court and REMAND for further proceedings consistent with this opinion.”
“For the foregoing reasons, we VACATE the order of the district court denying the TRGI Plaintiffs' motion for preliminary injunction and REMAND this case to the district court for further proceedings consistent with this opinion.”
“For the reasons stated above, we AFFIRM the judgment of the district court dismissing the complaint for lack of subject-matter jurisdiction.”
“Accordingly, the judgment of the district court is VACATED and the case is REMANDED for further proceedings consistent with this opinion.”
Put Judge Pérez's record to work
Ezel drafts and answers grounded in this exact profile: how Judge Pérez actually rules, not a generic AI guess.
Opens in Ezel Pro. Every answer is grounded in Judge Pérez's own signed orders and cites them.