Gerard Edmund Lynch

U.S. Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit circuit Appointed by Barack Obama (Democratic) 28 signed orders read

Signed rulings

A grounded sample of orders signed by this judge, with the verbatim dispositive language.

United States v. Janvier
08-5978-cr · 2010-03-26
Appeal (appellant (defendant Phillip Janvier)) Granted

“Because no warrant issued here during the term of supervised release, under the plain terms of the governing statute the district court lacked power to revoke the supervised release term after its expiration ... The judgment of the district court revoking Janvier's supervised release is reversed. REVERSED.”

United States v. Barton
12-1116-cr · 2013-04-02
Appeal (appellant (appointed defense counsel Robert G. Smith)) Granted

“Under these circumstances, Smith's appointment was improper from the outset, and he may not be required to continue serving as Barton's attorney. REVERSED AND REMANDED.”

Simon v. City of New York
11-5386-cv · 2013-08-16
Appeal (appellant (plaintiff Alexina Simon)) Granted

“We hold only that defendants are not entitled to absolute prosecutorial immunity with respect to Simon's allegation that she was unlawfully detained for investigative interrogation. Accordingly, the judgment is VACATED and REMANDED for further proceedings consistent with this opinion.”

Entergy Nuclear Vermont Yankee, LLC v. Shumlin
12-707 · 2013-12-10
Appeal (appellant (Entergy Nuclear Vermont Yankee)) Denied

“Because the Generating Tax is a tax within the meaning of the TIA, and Vermont provides an adequate state court forum for Entergy's challenges to the validity of that tax, the TIA deprives the federal courts of jurisdiction to consider those challenges. The judgment of the district court dismissing Entergy's complaint for lack of jurisdiction is accordingly Affirmed.”

Cuomo v. Crane Co.
13-4344-cv · 2014-11-13
Appeal (appellant (defendant Crane Co.)) Granted

“Because we conclude that Crane's proffered evidence sufficed to assert a colorable federal defense at the removal stage, we reverse.”

Liu Meng-Lin v. Siemens AG
13-4385-cv · 2014-08-14
Appeal (appellant (plaintiff Liu Meng-Lin)) Denied

“Because the whistleblower antiretaliation provision of the Dodd-Frank Act, 15 U.S.C. 78u-6(h), does not apply extraterritorially, and Liu has failed to plead facts constituting a domestic application of the antiretaliation provision, the district court correctly granted Siemens's motion to dismiss. The judgment of the district court is therefore AFFIRMED.”

American Civil Liberties Union v. Clapper
14-42-cv · 2015-10-29
Appeal (appellants (plaintiffs American Civil Liberties Union et al.)) Denied

“Accordingly, we DENY the motion for a preliminary injunction at this time ... and REMAND the matter for further proceedings in the district court consistent with this opinion and our prior opinion in this case.”

Gallego v. Northland Group Inc.
15-1666 · 2016-02-22
Appeal (appellant (plaintiff Jeffrey J. Gallego)) Granted in part

“For the reasons stated above, we VACATE the judgment dismissing the case for lack of subject-matter jurisdiction and AFFIRM the denial of class certification. The case is REMANDED for further proceedings consistent with this opinion.”

United States v. Gabinskaya
15-1281-cr · 2016-07-12
Appeal (appellant (defendant Tatyana Gabinskaya)) Denied

“For the foregoing reasons, we conclude that all of Gabinskaya's arguments are without merit, and we therefore AFFIRM the judgment of the district court.”

Hermes of Paris, Inc. v. Swain
16-3720-cv · 2017-08-14
Appeal (appellant (respondent Matthew Swain)) Denied

“Swain's challenge to the district court's subject matter jurisdiction therefore fails, because under Distajo complete diversity is measured by reference to the parties to the petition to compel arbitration. ... Accordingly, the district court had subject matter jurisdiction over the petition to compel arbitration ... we AFFIRM the judgment of the district court.”

Obeya v. Sessions
16-3922-ag · 2018-03-08
Petition for review (petitioner (Clement Obeya)) Granted

“Because the Lugo factors weigh heavily in Obeya's favor, we hold that the BIA erred when it retroactively applied the Diaz-Lizarraga standard to his removal proceedings. ... We therefore GRANT Obeya's petition for review and REVERSE the order of the BIA. The matter is REMANDED to the BIA for further proceedings not inconsistent with this opinion.”

United States v. Balde
17-3337-cr · 2019-06-13
Appeal (appellant (defendant Souleymane Balde)) Denied

“Because we find both arguments unavailing, we AFFIRM the judgment of the district court.”

Put Judge Lynch's record to work

Ezel drafts and answers grounded in this exact profile: how Judge Lynch actually rules, not a generic AI guess.

Opens in Ezel Pro. Every answer is grounded in Judge Lynch's own signed orders and cites them.