Dennis Jacobs
Signed rulings
A grounded sample of orders signed by this judge, with the verbatim dispositive language.
“For the foregoing reasons, we affirm the judgment of the district court.”
“We conclude that the plan administrator's interpretation of one of the eligibility requirements for a Disability Retirement Pension was arbitrary and capricious. We therefore reverse the district court's dismissal and remand with instructions to return the case to the Fund for reconsideration in light of this opinion.”
“For the foregoing reasons, the judgment of the district court is AFFIRMED.”
“We hold that a party may forfeit subject-matter jurisdiction by failing to invoke it timely. We accordingly AFFIRM.”
“For the foregoing reasons, we AFFIRM the district court's grant of Bristol-Myers's motion to dismiss.”
“The judgment of the district court is AFFIRMED.”
“We conclude that the IPKCA is not vague as applied to Houtar and that both sentencing enhancements were applied properly. Accordingly, we AFFIRM the conviction and the sentence.”
“For the foregoing reasons, the petition for review is DENIED.”
“Accordingly, the state court's rejection of Canela's recantation was an 'unreasonable determination of the facts in light of the evidence presented,' 28 U.S.C. 2254(d); therefore, the state court unreasonably denied Fernandez's second motion for a new trial. ... we REVERSE and REMAND to the district court, with instruction to comply with our February 5, 2019 Order, directing the district court to issue a writ of habeas corpus to Fernandez.”
“We conclude that the State trial court's exclusion of evidence violated Scrimo's constitutional right to present a complete defense. Accordingly, we reverse without reaching Scrimo's ineffective assistance of counsel claim.”
“For the foregoing reasons, we reverse and remand the case to the district court. The court shall issue a writ of habeas corpus to Nappi by the thirtieth calendar day after the issuance of our mandate unless the state has, by that time, taken concrete and substantial steps to retry Nappi.”
“Accordingly, we grant the petition in part and remand the case to the BIA to determine whether Linares-Urrutia's asylum claim was timely. We dismiss the petition as to the remaining claims.”
Put Judge Jacobs's record to work
Ezel drafts and answers grounded in this exact profile: how Judge Jacobs actually rules, not a generic AI guess.
Opens in Ezel Pro. Every answer is grounded in Judge Jacobs's own signed orders and cites them.